Foreign buyers of the F-35A may not be aware that the US Air Force is already looking to upgrade its radar, avionics and engine because a year before its IOC - the current aircraft already cannot match rapid technology development by potential adversaries. (USAF photo)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
To: sukhoi-30mki
When other systems are upgraded, its capability augmentation, when the F-35 is upgraded, its obsolescence!
To: sukhoi-30mki
3 posted on
04/08/2015 6:35:44 AM PDT by
tgusa
(gun control: hitting your target.)
To: sukhoi-30mki
USAF Plans for Radical F-35 Upgrade Reveal Obsolescence What the Air Force really needs to upgrade are those that occupy positions at the top!
4 posted on
04/08/2015 6:36:59 AM PDT by
The Sons of Liberty
(Putin is a psychopath; 0bama is a sociopath; This can't end well.)
To: sukhoi-30mki
I heard this crap in the 80’s about nearly every armament we had.
We out spent everyone else into irrelevance.
5 posted on
04/08/2015 6:41:04 AM PDT by
Vendome
(Don't take life so seriously-you won't live through it anyway-Enjoy Yourself ala Louis Prima)
To: sukhoi-30mki
The US has enjoyed air superiority for so long, we’ve taken it for granted. Getting our clock cleaned in an air war would be a real wake-up call.
Part of the problem is the acquisition process. These long development cycles almost guarantee that what finally comes out will be obsolete.
6 posted on
04/08/2015 6:41:11 AM PDT by
rbg81
To: sukhoi-30mki
Where do we, the taxpayers who funded this Edsel, go to get our money back?
7 posted on
04/08/2015 6:42:41 AM PDT by
Arm_Bears
(Rope. Tree. Politician. Some assembly required.)
To: sukhoi-30mki
There must be some darn good lobbyists from the avionics industry working overtime out there.
8 posted on
04/08/2015 6:42:48 AM PDT by
Iron Munro
(It IS as BAD as you think and they ARE out to get you.)
To: sukhoi-30mki
And this bird was supposed to be a “relatively inexpensive” complement to the F-22.
I lay this mostly at the feet of those who thought the F-35 airframe could be all things to all service branches. Especially those who thought adding STOVL variant (F-35B) would not present significant technical challenges. In hindsight (which always has perfect clarity, LOL), it probably would have been more cost effective to design a completely separate aircraft for the Marines and the Brits)
Of course, that’s not how things work in the Pentagon, but you know, JMHO.
9 posted on
04/08/2015 6:44:31 AM PDT by
DemforBush
(Ex-Democrat, and NotforJeb. Just so we're clear.)
To: sukhoi-30mki
This is what happens when you try to build a one-size-fits-all solution for three VERY DIFFERENT branches of the Armed Services!
Different branches, with different needs, different combat roles, and different purposes need DIFFERENT equipment! PERIOD!
14 posted on
04/08/2015 6:52:23 AM PDT by
ExTxMarine
(Public sector unions: A & B agreeing on a contract to screw C!)
To: sukhoi-30mki
One thing that I didn't see in the article was whether the radar upgrade is needed right now or if this is just the beginning of a ten year plan. Our adversaries will be constantly improving and we can't wait until they have passed us to start thinking about an upgrade.
"There's a lot of work to be done, Harrigian said but from where we sit, we're on the right glide path to IOC.
Glide path? Maybe the engines needed to be started on the whole project a long time ago.
16 posted on
04/08/2015 6:57:07 AM PDT by
KarlInOhio
(Darth Obama on 529 plans: I am altering the deal. Pray I don't alter it any further.)
To: sukhoi-30mki
Meanwhile the decision not to buy more F22s looks more and more like a disaster brought to you by Barack Obama.....who else could it be?
To: Jet Jaguar
23 posted on
04/08/2015 7:14:11 AM PDT by
Army Air Corps
(Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
To: sukhoi-30mki; stephenjohnbanker; Gilbo_3; Impy; NFHale; GOPsterinMA; BillyBoy; fieldmarshaldj
F-35/JSF= middle class welfare
Says they spent $400B so far and projected unit cost will be $250M per fighter, and its never been used having too many problems still fixing, and its already obsolete having taken so long needed major redesigns.
Unfortunately most of the GOP candidates led by Grahanmesty and McCain would respond:
“Dab-nab-it, I don't care if we spent $400T on it so far and it doesn't work, its national security, nothing but the BEST for our troops...DADADA, flags waving, I love Americure”
24 posted on
04/08/2015 7:15:08 AM PDT by
sickoflibs
(King Obama : 'The debate is over. The time for talk is over. Just follow my commands you serfs""')
To: sukhoi-30mki
It’s pretty bad when your procurement, design and development cycle is so long that the plane is obsolete before it even enters service.
25 posted on
04/08/2015 7:18:49 AM PDT by
-YYZ-
(Strong like bull, smart like tractor.)
To: sukhoi-30mki
29 posted on
04/08/2015 8:09:34 AM PDT by
pabianice
(LINE)
To: sukhoi-30mki
I want to photoshop a propeller onto that thing, but I don’t do photoshop
30 posted on
04/08/2015 8:12:18 AM PDT by
GeronL
(CLEARLY CRUZ 2016)
To: sukhoi-30mki
36 posted on
04/08/2015 8:53:57 AM PDT by
PeteePie
(Righteousness exalts a nation, but sin is a reproach to any people - Proverbs 14:34)
To: sukhoi-30mki
Bombs away!!!!
Meanwhile B52s 80 years old are still flying,, after being retro’ed a few times..
38 posted on
04/08/2015 9:13:54 AM PDT by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi - Revolution is a'brewin!!!)
To: sukhoi-30mki
That’s what happens when an airplane has a 20 year gestation period.
39 posted on
04/08/2015 9:15:01 AM PDT by
hattend
(Firearms and ammunition...the only growing industries under the Obama regime.)
To: sukhoi-30mki
In other words, the plans were stolen and new systems have to be created.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson