Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

At the end of the article:

" I will not mourn the loss of Sarah Brady. I do however mourn the loss of those who were murdered because they were enjoined by unconstitutional laws to defensive weapons. Government must stop insuring that only violent criminals are armed. "

1 posted on 04/07/2015 8:26:41 AM PDT by rktman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: rktman
She renamed all the firearms that looked somewhat scary as assault weapons.

Josh Sugarman

2 posted on 04/07/2015 8:29:24 AM PDT by MileHi (Liberalism is an ideology of parasites, hypocrites, grievance mongers, victims, and control freaks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

This harmful woman cared nothing for law abiding citizens. She made a lot of money, gained fame with the elitists, and became a predictable tyrant and zealot. There is no responsibility other than to speak of her fairly and tell the truth, dead or not.


4 posted on 04/07/2015 8:33:45 AM PDT by Luke21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman
I don't mourn the loss of any liberal that spent decades destroying the second amendment.
5 posted on 04/07/2015 8:34:03 AM PDT by ontap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

Who mourns the passing of another opportunitistic DC trough-feeder?

...Especially one who rolls out a drooling vegetable to cement her status as perpetual money-grubbing victim?

I’m sure Satan wasn’t looking forward to this arrival.


6 posted on 04/07/2015 8:34:14 AM PDT by LadyBuck (If your name isn't on a list already, you should be ashamed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

bttt


7 posted on 04/07/2015 8:34:25 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

Sarah Brady exemplified dishonesty and the callous abuse of a disabled spouse.


8 posted on 04/07/2015 8:36:49 AM PDT by NorthMountain ("The time has come", the Walrus said, "to talk of many things")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman
But they’re self-righteous in dictating to poor people what they should eat.

Ding Dong the BWitch is Dead! The devil claimed his own.

10 posted on 04/07/2015 8:41:17 AM PDT by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

11 posted on 04/07/2015 8:41:23 AM PDT by JPG (Lefty reporters doing battle with Sen. Cruz will continue to be chewed-up and spit-out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

I’ll bet Sarah helped sell more firearms than any individual prior to Obama. It delights me that she saw disarmament plans fail and the trends actually move in the opposite direction.


12 posted on 04/07/2015 8:50:44 AM PDT by Charles Martel (Endeavor to persevere...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

Three cheers for pneumonia! Hip, hip,-


13 posted on 04/07/2015 9:02:34 AM PDT by longfellow (Bill Maher, the 21st hijacker.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

***She cleverly began to change firearm adjectives and successfully demonized firearms based on simple cosmetics.***

She did not start this, it was started back in 1962 when Thomas J Dodd and Emanuel Cellar proposed a handgun registration scheme. Long guns would not be affected, they said! Oh yes, they also wanted a BAN on the import of foreign “Saturday Night Specials” and 5 shot bolt action army surplus rifles. The real reason for this was to protect their own firearm industries in the NE.

Real demonization began in 1968 with the murder of Bobby Kennedy. Gun owners were put through hell in those years and Congress passed the 1968 gun control Act into law.

The libs were so thrilled to ban import of army surplus rifles and small handguns they failed to realize that the did not ban the very firearm used to kill Bobby.

So they then came back with demands to ban ALL handguns.


15 posted on 04/07/2015 9:16:51 AM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

Anyone remember the 1970s when the anti-gunners discovered the SCOTUS Miller decision?

TV scripts began to play up the angle that RIFLES were good, AND protected under the Miller decision, but HANDGUNS were bad and not protected under the Miller decision because they were not standard military equipment for the common soldier who would be armed with a rifle. The Miller decision was really about a sawed off shotgun being legal if it was Military equipment.
The TV show ALL IN THE FAMILY mouthed this nonsense along with many others.

Now rifles are BAD, BAD, BAD!

Never trust a politician with your firearm rights!


17 posted on 04/07/2015 9:23:58 AM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar ( NEVER trust a politician with your firearm rights!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

I will not speak ill of the deceased, may God have mercy on her soul. Her temporal actions were contrary to the freedoms we enjoy and I disagree vehemently with virtually everything for which she stood. Thanks be to God her efforts were in vain. However as a child of God only He knows the state of her immortal soul. May she rest in peace...


24 posted on 04/07/2015 10:32:34 AM PDT by OriginalChristian (The end of America, as founded, began when the first Career Politician was elected...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman
When conservatives are against guns.....they don't own or buy a gun.

When liberals are against guns...they want all guns outlawed.... for everybody PATHETIC

27 posted on 04/07/2015 11:11:23 AM PDT by terycarl (common sense prevails over all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson