Seems appropriate. Murder is murder.
To: Slings and Arrows
The question is whether the Muslim status of the killed people is slanting the usual practice. What would likely happen if these people had been Buddhists?
2 posted on
03/02/2015 2:04:50 PM PST by
HiTech RedNeck
(Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
To: Slings and Arrows
Those rules, like laws, are just for show these days.
3 posted on
03/02/2015 2:07:11 PM PST by
Paladin2
To: Slings and Arrows
Ah. At last we find a type of murder that prosecutors have no trouble seeking the death penalty for.
8 posted on
03/02/2015 2:17:40 PM PST by
Steely Tom
(Vote GOP for A Slower Handbasket)
To: Slings and Arrows
Prosecutors to seek death penalty for N.C. man charged in Muslims' STUDENT killings There ya go, fixed.
..can't really say random, they were fighting over a parking space.
To: Slings and Arrows
Good. The scumbag killed three people over a parking space. The sooner he is flushed from the planet, the better.
To: Slings and Arrows
These fights between neighbors make people do crazy things. I'd like to know his side of the parking story.
Part of wisdom is to not tempt other people to commit violence. The tempter is guilty, too.
12 posted on
03/02/2015 2:49:57 PM PST by
donna
(Pray for revival.)
To: Slings and Arrows
Agreed.
But I suspect this prosecutor would not be seeking the death penalty if the victims were Christians, or Jews, or Hindus, or Buddhists, or atheists, or... ...anything other than Muslims.
13 posted on
03/02/2015 2:50:04 PM PST by
WayneS
(Barack Obama makes Neville Chamberlin look like George Patton.)
To: Slings and Arrows
Good. One less SPLC contributor.
14 posted on
03/02/2015 3:10:36 PM PST by
skeeter
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson