Posted on 03/01/2015 1:18:01 PM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
The media has never grilled Obama about anything. The Republicans should mention this quite often during interviews.
Scott Walker did a good job answering Chris Wallace’s questions.
It is possible, just possible, that Wallace is trying to prep Walker for the type of media proctological examination he is likely to endure as long as he is a candidate, and also if/when we wins the White House.
Republicans are waking up. Democrats lied to them - called them names... and were WRONG.
Our guys know NOW that they can oppose open borders without being xenophobic.
They can be critical of Al Sharpton without being racist.
And they can be proud of being an American without being provincial.
MORE Republicans need to EVOLVE... Grow UP... GET REAL... and share that with the MSM types like Chris Wallace.
“Yeah, I’ve changed... I’ve opened my eyes.. I discovered I don’t give a damn about names Democrats want to call me to belittle me. I’m secure in who I am...”
Walker knows how to fight and that is what we need he has walked the walk and he is still standing do not expect the GOP to defend him .
Another GOP Etch-A-Sketch
Yes... a Moon Walker (Pun), smoothly walking backwards; it seems many find it entertaining; judging by all the applause.
Don’t understand why FOX continues to retain this virulently pro Democrat little weasel on its staff. While Whoraldo and Wan Williams are merely comical, this insect is very dangerous.
Wallace knew damn well that the media including him have got to stop playing got ya questions and yet Wallace still goes out there and does it.
How about getting Dems on their flip flop
Not possible. Chris Wallace is an arrogant, snarky proctologist in his own right.
Walker supported the Bush-McCain Amnesty in 2005-2006.
In 2013, he publicly supported a “path to citizenship.”
Now he's trying to claim he's “changed.”
I don't believe him.
It's the standard GOP camouflage:
(1) Support “vigorous enforcement” of existing laws.
(2) Then do nothing serious to make that happen.
(3) Do absolutely nothing to slow down massive LEGAL immigration.
(4) Actively support more work visas for bogus “high skill” foreigners.
(5) Then, after the election, try once more to shove Amnesty down our throats.
Again, who is your preferred candidate?
Or how about simply saying....why does my view on immigration matter? Congress writes the laws and as President it would be my job to enforce them, regardless of my views. I know after the last 6 years that may seem strange to you but that’s what the Constitution says.
If the illegal aliens dont return home and apply like everybody else who really IS an immigrant, then it is amnesty.
We either have the rule of law or we dont.
We must elect a President who WILL uphold the rule of law after this one who wont.
I hope hes not just saying this because he thinks he has to and then doesn’t follow through.
I was disgusted to find out Bush actually decreased interior and border enforcement after 9/11.
Or we could just enforce the laws on the books and not do anything new...
Never laid a glove on him.
How—by pretending he’s not pro-amnesty when he is?
Wallace, being a GOPe mouthpiece, actually didn’t press him on the non-answer denial.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.