[jtal]

Kennedy probably doesn’t want to be seen as being “on the wrong side of history” so I’m thinking it’s all over here. :-(

[Genoa]

The Volunteer State will not concur.

[FlingWingFlyer]

These clowns are wasting time and money. The Constitution DOES NOT “PROTECT” homosexual marriage. It’s not in there. Check it out!

[DoodleDawg]

This should be interesting. It’s almost certain to be a 5-4 decision no matter which way the court decides.

[Politicalkiddo]

The black-robed morons who side with the deviants will regret this most bitterly. If not in this life, the next one for certain.

[Genoa]

Drudge got it up.

[MileHi]

Since these perverts are almost all athiests, what “right” are they hanging their hat on?

[mmichaels1970]

Anybody want to take bets on how this ruling comes down?

[Genoa]

First SSM, then polygamous and incestuous “marriage” won’t be far behind. The same principles apply.

[cripplecreek]

I’d like to know that the constitution protects voters from black robed dictators.

I and millions of others have already voted on this and made the decision.

[Crusher138]

It will be a 6-3 decision in favor of gay marriage.

Only Thomas, Scalia and Alito will vote for traditional marriage.

Roberts is compromised and Kennedy just wants to be liked.

[Tzimisce]

Just think: Gay marriage is protected by the 1st Amendment.

Refusing to bake a cake for a Gay wedding is not.

Welcome to Obamaland. :)

[Bubba_Leroy]

The Constitution says whatever 5 out of 9 Supreme Court Justices say it says.

In this case, there is no question how 8 of the 9 will decide (4 for homosexual marriage and 4 against), so the Constitution says whatever Kennedy says it says. Be afraid. Be very afraid.

[lastchance]

Does it give anyone the right to marry? I thought rather that it prohibited States from banning certain people from marrying because of artificial legal barriers set upon entering into marriage such as race.

Prohibiting the marriage of two people of the same sex or of close blood kin or of those underage is not just a social convention to meet local prejudices but a practice based on the natural definition of marriage and government’s interest in protecting true marriage and the children of that union.

[CivilWarBrewing]

SCOTUS will SHOCK me and rule that same sex marriage is NOT A ‘RIGHT’ or protected under our Constitution.

[OldNavyVet]

In the 1950s, I was hit upon in Albuquerque by a homosexual priest while I was travelling across country on leave. Flew in on an Air Force plane and then - was hit upon after midnight at train station, while waiting to continue on to California.

Nice guy ... talked a bit, that's it.

[chajin]

I smell a Roe v Wade coming. All this will do is what Roe did to abortion, which is to shove homosexual marriage down everyone's throat, creating resentment all around: the gays and their marriage supporters will resent that they will never have the acceptance of those who lose the decision, and the rest of us will resent that once again the voice of the people and the limited powers of the Constitution have been trampled upon by those who long ago ceased to be the loyal opposition and became the internal saboteurs.

[Fido969]

We're doomed.

[Viennacon]

Russia, China and the Islamic State are laughing at how we are disintegrating culturally

[Amendment10]

I hope that this Supreme Court case is not a staged, Alinsky-type setup where so-called pro-traditional marriage attorneys make frivolous points against same-sex marriage.