Kennedy probably doesn’t want to be seen as being “on the wrong side of history” so I’m thinking it’s all over here. :-(
Too bad this was a one sided battle. Can’t win when nobody fights back.
I think you’re right.
Kennedy has consistently been ardently in favor of Gay marriage rights.
My thought, it’s simple. Where the heck in the constitution does it say that our constitution supports it or doesn’t support it? How is different from ROe vs Wade?
Leave it a state’s issue where by the people vote on it. Like it should be.
Im afraid your right in that the Federal employees in black robes have little to no respect for the words much-less limits of the Federal Constitution deciding again and again to claim it contains a clause on every matter they can imagination.
It is precisely this lawless tendency of the Federal courts that shall one day see them and their corrupt ‘government’ overthrown as the unbounded tyranny it has become.
If We wanted Washington to be in-charge of every issue large and small, written and unwritten we would never have spelled out any of their powers. If we wanted Washington to have the power to anoint boundless dictators in black robes with power over everything we would not long bother with election much as we wont be soon enough with their results deemed ill-relevant by those dictators.
What we have now with the Federal Court is nether any form of written law insomuch that the Federal Constitutions few and enumerated powers does not include the subject at hand, nor rule of the people insomuch that the people HAVE spoken in the proper state venues on the matter now being usurped from them by the Federal ‘courts’.
Indeed the matter is so wide spread on so many issues from every area of American life that it is becoming increasingly impossible for the people of this once free country to govern themselves. Hence the present drive among our States in earnest toward the only inevitable response to this tyranny... revolution.
It is my hope that the currently corrupt and despotic members of that court live long enough to see the revolution they have already triggered bring down upon them despotism that they have so carelessly created. That the Rest of us live to see freedom, written law, and true justice reborn in what was once before them the land of the free.
Yeah, forget the freakin’ Constitution! Which way is the ind blowing?
Sadly, I think you are spot on.
This is great news. All lawyers know that there is no constitutional basis for perverted sex in a legally sanctioned “marriage” with adopted children watching. No where is there a hint in the constitution of any regulation over a state of the basic form of the constituent family. The Court will rule that States control the definition and these queers can crawl back under their moldy rocks. They need mental health aid. Pray for them.
Please stop using the terms “homosexual marriage” and “gay marriage.”
Homosexuals have all the same “rights” to marry as heterosexuals (members of the opposite gender who are legally able to marry and consent). Homosexuals want additional rights called “same-sex marriage.”
This is so clearly a states-rights issue that if the USSC decides in favor of it (rather than putting it back in the states), there ought to be an outright revolution (Levin’s Liberty Amendments) to bring the US Constitution back into power and clamp down on these tyrants.
Enough of this BS where less than 2% of the population dictates to the others.
That is TYRANNY.