Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court to Decide Whether Constitution Protects Same-Sex Marriage
WSJ ^ | January 16, 2015 | By JESS BRAVIN

Posted on 01/16/2015 1:19:49 PM PST by Jim Robinson

Decision Later This Year Could Extend Gay Marriage to All 50 States or Cloud Existing Unions

WASHINGTON—The Supreme Court on Friday said it would decide whether the U.S. Constitution gives same-sex couples the right to marry, signaling what could be the final chapter of a push by advocates to extend gay unions nationwide.

The court accepted challenges to same-sex marriage bans in four states—Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio and Tennessee—that a federal appeals court upheld in November 2014. The ruling by the Sixth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Cincinnati departed from recent decisions by other appeals courts that found same-sex couples enjoyed a right to marry under the 14th Amendment’s equal-protection and due-process provisions.

The justices are taking up the issue in the middle of the court’s current term after having earlier rejected pleas by states to reinstate marriage restrictions that appellate courts had found unconstitutional. The Sixth Circuit ruling, the first to uphold the restriction of marriage to heterosexuals, created a split among the court circuits that didn’t exist in October, making it more likely the Supreme Court could get involved.

The court agreed to hear two specific constitutional questions on same-sex marriage laws and will hear extended arguments.

(Excerpt) Read more at wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: homosexualagenda; marriage; scotus; ssm
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-166 next last

1 posted on 01/16/2015 1:19:49 PM PST by Jim Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Kennedy probably doesn’t want to be seen as being “on the wrong side of history” so I’m thinking it’s all over here. :-(


2 posted on 01/16/2015 1:22:07 PM PST by jtal (St. Michael the Archangel, defend us in battle ....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

The Volunteer State will not concur.


3 posted on 01/16/2015 1:22:12 PM PST by Genoa (Starve the beast.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jtal

Too bad this was a one sided battle. Can’t win when nobody fights back.


4 posted on 01/16/2015 1:23:15 PM PST by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

These clowns are wasting time and money. The Constitution DOES NOT “PROTECT” homosexual marriage. It’s not in there. Check it out!


5 posted on 01/16/2015 1:23:23 PM PST by FlingWingFlyer (When the hell do I get MY white privilege? I'm tired of busting my @$$ for a living.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jtal

I think you’re right.


6 posted on 01/16/2015 1:23:40 PM PST by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

This should be interesting. It’s almost certain to be a 5-4 decision no matter which way the court decides.


7 posted on 01/16/2015 1:24:14 PM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

The black-robed morons who side with the deviants will regret this most bitterly. If not in this life, the next one for certain.


8 posted on 01/16/2015 1:24:41 PM PST by Politicalkiddo ("I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Drudge got it up.


9 posted on 01/16/2015 1:25:24 PM PST by Genoa (Starve the beast.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Since these perverts are almost all athiests, what “right” are they hanging their hat on?


10 posted on 01/16/2015 1:25:26 PM PST by MileHi (Liberalism is an ideology of parasites, hypocrites, grievance mongers, victims, and control freaks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jtal

Kennedy has consistently been ardently in favor of Gay marriage rights.

My thought, it’s simple. Where the heck in the constitution does it say that our constitution supports it or doesn’t support it? How is different from ROe vs Wade?

Leave it a state’s issue where by the people vote on it. Like it should be.


11 posted on 01/16/2015 1:27:05 PM PST by nikos1121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Genoa
Drudge got it up.

Nice, but I don't care what he does on his own time.

12 posted on 01/16/2015 1:27:07 PM PST by MileHi (Liberalism is an ideology of parasites, hypocrites, grievance mongers, victims, and control freaks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MileHi

Amazing, huh. They talk about “God given rights” as spelled out in the constitution but they don’t believe in God.


13 posted on 01/16/2015 1:27:58 PM PST by VerySadAmerican (Obama voters are my enemy. And so are republican voters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: All

Anybody want to take bets on how this ruling comes down?


14 posted on 01/16/2015 1:28:08 PM PST by mmichaels1970
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

First SSM, then polygamous and incestuous “marriage” won’t be far behind. The same principles apply.


15 posted on 01/16/2015 1:28:23 PM PST by Genoa (Starve the beast.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

I’d like to know that the constitution protects voters from black robed dictators.

I and millions of others have already voted on this and made the decision.


16 posted on 01/16/2015 1:28:50 PM PST by cripplecreek ("For by wise guidance you can wage your war")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

It will be a 6-3 decision in favor of gay marriage.

Only Thomas, Scalia and Alito will vote for traditional marriage.

Roberts is compromised and Kennedy just wants to be liked.


17 posted on 01/16/2015 1:30:04 PM PST by Crusher138 ("Then conquer we must, for our cause it is just")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Just think: Gay marriage is protected by the 1st Amendment.

Refusing to bake a cake for a Gay wedding is not.

Welcome to Obamaland. :)


18 posted on 01/16/2015 1:30:27 PM PST by Tzimisce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
The Constitution says whatever 5 out of 9 Supreme Court Justices say it says.

In this case, there is no question how 8 of the 9 will decide (4 for homosexual marriage and 4 against), so the Constitution says whatever Kennedy says it says. Be afraid. Be very afraid.

19 posted on 01/16/2015 1:30:55 PM PST by Bubba_Leroy (The Obamanation Continues)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Does it give anyone the right to marry? I thought rather that it prohibited States from banning certain people from marrying because of artificial legal barriers set upon entering into marriage such as race.

Prohibiting the marriage of two people of the same sex or of close blood kin or of those underage is not just a social convention to meet local prejudices but a practice based on the natural definition of marriage and government’s interest in protecting true marriage and the children of that union.


20 posted on 01/16/2015 1:31:24 PM PST by lastchance (Credo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-166 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson