Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Asset seizures fuel police spending
Washington Post ^ | October 11, 2014 | Robert O'Harrow Jr., Steven Rich

Posted on 10/12/2014 8:53:49 AM PDT by Second Amendment First

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-120 next last

1 posted on 10/12/2014 8:53:49 AM PDT by Second Amendment First
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

Hey, hey, hey: Police are our friends. They’d never just take your money and spend it on themselves.


2 posted on 10/12/2014 8:57:32 AM PDT by Bettyprob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

“All of this is fundamentally at odds with the U.S. Constitution,”

HUGE understatement!


3 posted on 10/12/2014 8:58:39 AM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

Hey, hey, hey...those are Constitutional Patriots, ready to stand against illegitmate government power at a moments notice, just like the Revolutionaries, doncha know!?


4 posted on 10/12/2014 9:01:09 AM PDT by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

You said it! We have no Constitution.


5 posted on 10/12/2014 9:10:14 AM PDT by WKUHilltopper (And yet...we continue to tolerate this crap...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: WKUHilltopper

6 posted on 10/12/2014 9:11:16 AM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Bettyprob

Oh my, where to start.

You make it sound like the police just enter into ANYBODY’s home and take their money and then blow it on goodies for the police dept.

Actually, I think the law allows for police depts to be the recipient of captured dollars (after a conviction of the crooks). This is a good policy .. WHY ..?? Because then we can use those dollars for protective gear for our police; saving tax dollars for city’s, county’s and federal agencies.

If you don’t think the police need protective gear, you should find the video of the raid in LA where several police got killed because they were not in any protective gear, and they were using hand guns against AK-47’s. That incident is the main reason police units are so “geared up” these days. Just watch a few episodes of “COPS” and you’ll find out what it’s like to be out there on the streets in today’s world.

Are all cops good guys ..?? Not possible. They’re just humans and humans make mistakes; they all have a different personality; some are just plain jerks. But, all in all, the majority of police I’ve had to work with were really the good guys.


7 posted on 10/12/2014 9:12:54 AM PDT by CyberAnt (True the Vote: " MY AMERICA, ... I'm terrified it's slipping away.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

8 posted on 10/12/2014 9:17:59 AM PDT by Dallas59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt
You make it sound like the police just enter into ANYBODY’s home and take their money and then blow it on goodies for the police dept.

During the 1990s, there were an average of 450 no-knock raids per month conducted by the NYPD alone, 10% of which were to the wrong address.

It's out of control.

9 posted on 10/12/2014 9:18:30 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (Democrats: the Party of slavery to the immensely wealthy for over 200 years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
“All of this is fundamentally at odds with the U.S. Constitution,” HUGE understatement!

Yes you are right. See below 4th amendment pertaining to illegal search and seizure.

"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

10 posted on 10/12/2014 9:22:58 AM PDT by cpdiii (Deckhand, Roughneck, Mud Man, Geologist, Pilot, Pharmacist. THE CONSTITUTION IS WORTH DYING FOR!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt

“Actually, I think the law allows for police depts to be the recipient of captured dollars (after a conviction of the crooks).”

You live under a rock. Do a little research. People’s cash and property is being taken on a regular basis. Many stories on this. The police accuse the property - not the person(s) of a crime or suspected crime. No way to defend that. You will spend way more trying to get back what they took.


11 posted on 10/12/2014 9:23:21 AM PDT by 1FreeAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie

How can it be “out of control” if it’s not happening today ..??

If it was happening today, the left would be screaming.

The only incidents I’ve heard about are from the EPA, FDA, etc. These are NOT police - these are govt agencies who have formed their own enforcement units. And, I’m hoping our next President will swiftly disband them.


12 posted on 10/12/2014 9:23:31 AM PDT by CyberAnt (True the Vote: " MY AMERICA, ... I'm terrified it's slipping away.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: 1FreeAmerican

Your comments are rude and unnecessary.

If you had read a previous post, you would have seen this comment: “The only incidents I’ve heard about are from the EPA, FDA, etc. These are NOT police - these are govt agencies who have formed their own enforcement units. And, I’m hoping our next President will swiftly disband them.


13 posted on 10/12/2014 9:27:15 AM PDT by CyberAnt (True the Vote: " MY AMERICA, ... I'm terrified it's slipping away.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt; 1FreeAmerican

No conviction is necessary. You must prove you are innocent of a crime. Whatever happened to innocent until proven guilty?


14 posted on 10/12/2014 9:28:20 AM PDT by Second Amendment First
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt
You make it sound like the police just enter into ANYBODY’s home and take their money and then blow it on goodies for the police dept.

What they do now is pull people over on the highway, get a drug sniffing dog around the car, coach the dog to bark, search the car, and then confiscate any money found without any evidence that the cash was involved in criminal activity.

Then the citizen has to prove the money is legitimate, which can be a very costly process. Basically, civil asset forfeiture is based on the absurdity that an inanimate object has committed a crime.

Any police officer that has pulled over a citizen and confiscated their cash without any evidence of a crime is a thieving piece of human vermin and should be imprisoned for the rest of their natural life.
15 posted on 10/12/2014 9:28:42 AM PDT by microgood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt
I think you need to read this:

Stop and Seizure
16 posted on 10/12/2014 9:34:01 AM PDT by microgood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

Some here love this

RICO is wonderful


17 posted on 10/12/2014 9:36:54 AM PDT by wardaddy (Ferguson MO...but i thought blacks went north to escape the racism of mean ol southerners)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: microgood

Some people will defend ALL cops no matter the evidence. They’re no different than those who defend Obama no matter what.


18 posted on 10/12/2014 9:39:46 AM PDT by VerySadAmerican (Liberals were raised by women or wimps. And they're all stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: microgood

coach the dog to bark LOL yea only if they find explosives or drugs.

Dogs don’t bark at money for crying out loud and then the police take it with out charge, what on earth are you on about


19 posted on 10/12/2014 9:48:12 AM PDT by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: VerySadAmerican

there is good and bad in all professions but to hear a handful of loons to make up stories about police making dogs bark so they can take money is pure B/S and only fits in with the usual crap of hating police by the usual suspects of anarchists


20 posted on 10/12/2014 9:49:23 AM PDT by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-120 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson