Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Second Amendment First

“All of this is fundamentally at odds with the U.S. Constitution,”

HUGE understatement!


3 posted on 10/12/2014 8:58:39 AM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: BenLurkin

You said it! We have no Constitution.


5 posted on 10/12/2014 9:10:14 AM PDT by WKUHilltopper (And yet...we continue to tolerate this crap...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin
“All of this is fundamentally at odds with the U.S. Constitution,” HUGE understatement!

Yes you are right. See below 4th amendment pertaining to illegal search and seizure.

"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

10 posted on 10/12/2014 9:22:58 AM PDT by cpdiii (Deckhand, Roughneck, Mud Man, Geologist, Pilot, Pharmacist. THE CONSTITUTION IS WORTH DYING FOR!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

And yet you have not seen any federal judges yell “its not constitutional”. Like they do with every thing else. Because the judges are political hacks who have been bought and paid for.


110 posted on 10/12/2014 4:41:42 PM PDT by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson