Posted on 09/01/2014 8:15:47 AM PDT by RoosterRedux
In England the liberal left wing ideologues are shaking their heads with shame at the revelations coming from the town of Rotherham. In a huge scandal it has emerged that hundreds of children in state run childrens homes were systematically abused by gangs of Muslim men.
*snip*
The fact that this sex abuse ring was perpetrated by Asian (Pakistani) men forces one to ask whether the crimes are somehow linked to their culture and religion. The police and social services were useless precisely because they thought the behaviors were linked with the Pakistani culture and religion, and why did so many in the Asian community turn a blind eye to what was going on?
I suspect it is because the abuse of women is not only part of Asian culture, but part of the Islamic religion/culture.
*snip*
If the woman is not Muslim the Muslim male has the right to own them as slaves. They can be captured as spoils of war (jihad). They can be sold without their consent. Can be kept as sex slaves and any children born to them will be Muslim. Weve seen this happening recently in Northern Iraq. The ISIS warriors captured Christian and Yazidi women and sold them as sex slaves.
(Excerpt) Read more at patheos.com ...
I wish they’d drop that “Asian” lingo. Makes it sound like Chinatown is raping and pillaging.
Let the secular humanists destroy themselves then. Did not Napoleon say something along the lines of “when you’re enemy is committing suicide, don’t interfere”???
The first error is in the first sentence. They have no shame. Either they don't discuss it, or blame is deflected to some existing slogan they have in their bag
-— They have no shame. Either they don’t discuss it, or blame is deflected to some existing slogan they have in their bag -—
Yep. “Religion” is to blame. Christians are just as bad. Etc.
They are hoping to be the last ones killed by the Muslims that is why.
Yeah, except where Christians or Jews (especially) are involved. Then it's stark evil. At their core, the Lefties have simultaneous guilt and power complexes. How is that possible? Easy. They feel guilty because Western civilization is advanced and the Third World is backward. Instead of looking at the "why", they take the short cut and attribute it to racism and colonialism. In their mind, it is OUR culture that is entirely responsible for the cultural shortcomings of the other. The Power complex comes from the fantasy that if THEY had power, they would be able to fix it. Not by raising up the other culture (that would be WORK), but by bringing ours down to their Other's level.
“Asian” in UK, not unreasonably, is generally used to refer to the largest group of immigrants from the continent of Asia, who are from South Asia: Pakistan, Bangladesh and India.
The same term in USA, equally reasonably, is used to refer to our largest group of immigrants from that continent, East Asians: Chinese, Japanese, Vietnamese, etc.
The term just means different things in the two countries.
Actually, I haven't seen much about these children being concentrated in these homes. Many of them lived with their families, often in state housing projects.
If someone has actual evidence on whether this claim is correct, I'd be interested in seeing it.
The Quran states
Men are the maintainers of women because Allah has made some of them to excel others and because they spend out of their property; the good women are therefore obedient, guarding the unseen as Allah has guarded; and (as to) those on whose part you fear desertion [committing a religious sin], admonish them, and leave them alone in the sleeping-places and beat them; then if they obey you, do not seek a way against them.
So the man is superior. The woman is obedient and can be beaten. Thats nice.
Theres more: If the woman is not Muslim the Muslim male has the right to own them as slaves. They can be captured as spoils of war (jihad). They can be sold without their consent. Can be kept as sex slaves and any children born to them will be Muslim. Weve seen this happening recently in Northern Iraq. The ISIS warriors captured Christian and Yazidi women and sold them as sex slaves.
You got it. The greatness of a faith is how the female half is treated. Islam flunks out in that area.
About 1 in 3 of all marriages in Saudi Arabia, Iran and Pakistan are first cousin marriages; while overall consanguineous endogamous marriages exceed 65 to 80% in various Islamic populations of the Middle East, North Africa and Islamic Central Asia.
If white fools throughout the Western nations don't recover from this self-destructive sickness soon, they will condemn their descendents to living in a future that will be hostile and even dangerous in many areas.
What's described in the article is a form of self-destructive insanity.
Or even better yet, compare how Jesus treated women vs. how Mohammed treated women. You will find the answers there.
Ah, the Dems will back these folks because of tolerance for their Islamic religious belief of pedophilia.
Ah, so! That makes sense.
I remember seeing a movie a number of years ago, based on a true story, “Not Without My Daugther”, about an American woman who escaped from Iran during the hight of the Islamic revolution there.
Which in time could come back to the Dems in angry blowback.
The term isn’t really used logically in either country, since Turks, Arabs, Iranians and Uzbeks are all equally from Asia as are East Asians and South Asians.
But there’s no rule that words have to be used in logical ways, especially in English! :)
The worldview of secular humanism is subjectivistic and relativistic. The lack of objective absolutes leads to moral equivalency and cultural equivalency.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.