Posted on 08/04/2014 12:47:04 PM PDT by nickcarraway
A federal appeals judge issued a blistering dissent in a death-row case on Monday, declaring that an execution system that relies on drugs is doomed and the guillotine would be better.
"Using drugs meant for individuals with medical needs to carry out executions is a misguided effort to mask the brutality of executions by making them look serene and peaceful — like something any one of us might experience in our final moments," Judge Alex Kozinski of the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals wrote.
"But executions are, in fact, nothing like that. They are brutal, savage events, and nothing the state tries to do can mask that reality. Nor should it. If we as a society want to carry out executions, we should be willing to face the fact that the state is committing a horrendous brutality on our behalf."
Kozinski went on to suggest that states that want to continue executing prisoners "return to more primitive — and foolproof — methods of execution."
"The guillotine is probably best but seems inconsistent with our national ethos. And the electric chair, hanging and the gas chamber are each subject to occasional mishaps," he continued. "The firing squad strikes me as the most promising. Eight or ten large-caliber rifle bullets fired at close range can inflict massive damage, causing instant death every time."
Kozinski's recommendations came in a dissent he wrote in the case of Joseph Wood, an Arizona prisoner sentenced to die for murdering his girlfriend and her father in 1989.
Wood, 55, is fighting his July 23 execution on First Amendment grounds, arguing that Arizona must provide details about the drugs it plans to use to execute him, including the source.
A three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit, in a 2-1 ruling, sided with Wood over the weekend, and the Arizona attorney general asked the full court for an en banc rehearing.
It rejected the state's request, but Kozinski dissented and predicted Wood will not get a permanent reprieve.
"I have little doubt that the Supreme Court will thwart this latest attempt to interfere with the State of Arizona’s efforts to carry out its lawful sentence and bring Wood to justice for the heinous crimes he committed a quarter century ago," he said.
"While I believe the state should and will prevail in this case, I don’t understand why the game is worth the candle," Kozinski wrote.
"A tremendous number of taxpayer dollars have gone into defending a procedure that is inherently flawed and ultimately doomed to failure. If the state wishes to continue carrying out executions, it would be better to own up that using drugs is a mistake and come up with something that will work, instead."
The use of lethal injections has been under increased scrutiny in recent months, largely due to the botched execution of Clayton Lockett in Oklahoma, who regained consciousness and writhed in pain midway through the procedure.
States have also faced increasing difficulty in obtaining execution drugs because pharmaceutical companies refuse to sell them for the purpose of killing people. They have turned to less-regulated compounding pharmacies and tried to keep them anonymous to protect them from legal hassles and protests.
A wave of inmates have challenged the secrecy laws and rules, but so far the U.S. Supreme Court has not stopped an execution on that basis — although some states are considering other methods.
Wood's attorney, Dale Baich, said previous lawsuits argued the secrecy violated the Eighth or 14th amendments, while he is making a First Amendment claim.
“The Ninth Circuit has correctly recognized the importance of the information Joseph Wood seeks," Baich said. "Without greater transparency from the state, it's impossible for the public to engage in informed debate, which is the cornerstone of democracy. We look forward to Arizona's compliance with this ruling.”
The Arizona attorney general's office said it plans to ask the U.S. Supreme Court to lift the stay of execution and allow Wood's lethal injection to proceed but had no comment on the judge's dissent.
But it wasn’t. It was Col. Henry Wirz, the Andersonville commandant.
Yep! It was!
The Lincoln conspirators had a multiple gallows. No waiting..................
... and it’s messy..................
removing a head from a body seems fundamentally wrong on too many levels for me.
Tie the prisoner to a chair with a half dozen sticks of dynamite tied to it, light the fuse and run.
Nitrogen Aspxyiation
Nitrogen Aspxyiation
Painless and very fast
When Jesus rules the world, how will those who commit murder be executed? Will they be stoned? Serious theological question. (jokes will be appreciated, though, God does have a sense of humor and I distinctly remember reading a reply in the Old Testament that sounded like sarcasm.)
There is no such thing as instant, painless death. Masks and sedatives are to make it easier for the spectators, not the participant.
Do whatever gets it over with fast and works.
I would go with one 45 ACP round through the temple. Cheap and effective
How about doing the job with a Computer controlled 50 Caliber Rifle.That would do the job rather completely and the computer wouldn’t suffer any guilt later.
I have underwent general anesthesia a few times and know that it is painless and if they chose to kill me I would be dead, dead, dead.
Lois Lerner should be first in the tumbrel to be executed by the guillotine
A hundred PO'd family members with automatic pellet guns at 10 yards. And one .45...for the coup de grace.
I nominate the wood chipper. Even the smallest town has one or acess to one, so no new capital expense, no new training costs, easily cleaned and mobile, thus easily deployed. Spares available with a phone call.
They’re great for composting!
That is wronger than anything wrong has ever been!
I think we should stop all this happy hs and go with the guillotine.
There, wasn’t that easy?
Not only that, it would return the death penalty's lost effectiveness as a deterrent by returning to a method that is fearsome rather than peaceful.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.