Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Viennacon; SunkenCiv; Nachum; narses; neverdem

So, during the years that we “were in control of” Iraq, why were these depots full of nerve gas and toxins not disposed of?


37 posted on 06/19/2014 6:47:25 PM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Robert A. Cook, PE

I’d assume there wasn’t a lot of incentive to do so, at least not right away. Getting rid of this stuff (especially if it has degraded and leaked) is a dangerous and expensive undertaking. With the new government in place, and Bush probably not expecting Obama to pull out all the troops, there was no urgency to pay attention to a decommissioned chemical plant from the 90s, much less spend American money to clean it up.


41 posted on 06/19/2014 6:50:59 PM PDT by Viennacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE; AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; cardinal4; ...

Sounds like some of the usual pro-Assad/pro-Iran/pro-PootyPoot agitprop we’ve been deluged with since the first big chemical weapons attack made by the Assad regime in its ongoing mass-murder of Syrian citizens.


54 posted on 06/19/2014 7:12:16 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE

good question for cheney and powell


80 posted on 06/20/2014 2:22:49 AM PDT by silverleaf (Age takes a toll: Please have exact change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson