Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Robert A. Cook, PE

I’d assume there wasn’t a lot of incentive to do so, at least not right away. Getting rid of this stuff (especially if it has degraded and leaked) is a dangerous and expensive undertaking. With the new government in place, and Bush probably not expecting Obama to pull out all the troops, there was no urgency to pay attention to a decommissioned chemical plant from the 90s, much less spend American money to clean it up.


41 posted on 06/19/2014 6:50:59 PM PDT by Viennacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: Viennacon

The article says it has potentially usable chemical. It must have been far more usable 12 years ago.


79 posted on 06/20/2014 1:11:40 AM PDT by xzins ( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson