1 posted on
06/19/2014 6:02:11 PM PDT by
Nachum
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
To: Nachum
2 posted on
06/19/2014 6:03:26 PM PDT by
Vision
(Living in beauty)
To: Nachum
There is a word...maybe two I am looking for here...Starts with an N, second ends with a t...
3 posted on
06/19/2014 6:04:17 PM PDT by
Norm Lenhart
(How's that 'lesser evil' workin' out for ya?)
To: Nachum
Impossible. Everyone knows that Saddam had no WMD’s. /sarc
4 posted on
06/19/2014 6:07:00 PM PDT by
jdsteel
(Give me freedom, not more government.)
To: Nachum
no military value? perhaps no conventional value but, for a terror - let me say that word again: TERROR - organization, I’d say this is the second time they stuck gold.
5 posted on
06/19/2014 6:08:02 PM PDT by
NonValueAdded
("The Arab Spring is over. Welcome to the Jihadi Spring." Jonah Goldberg)
To: Nachum
This issue is up next on Megyn Kelly.
6 posted on
06/19/2014 6:10:10 PM PDT by
cripplecreek
(Remember the River Raisin.)
To: Nachum
Can’t be true, the left has been saying for 10+ years Saddam had NO chemical weapons..so how can this be true..could it be..the left lied
To: Nachum
Saddam didn’t have wmd’s because the liberals said so. Whatever they say, over and over, becomes the truth because in postmodern times, the truth is only what you can convince others it is, nothing more.
To: Nachum
To: Nachum
Quick! Somebody had better alert Megyn Kelly!
To: Nachum
12 posted on
06/19/2014 6:12:55 PM PDT by
RushIsMyTeddyBear
(Great vid by ShorelineMike! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KOZjJk6nbD4&feature=plcp)
To: Nachum
Waiting for confirmation from ABC, CBS, & NBC.........
14 posted on
06/19/2014 6:14:31 PM PDT by
G Larry
(Which of Obama's policies do you think I'd support if he were white?)
To: Nachum
The US military was there for years. They had access at one time or another to every square inch of Iraq. They told us that they were looking thoroughly for WMD's and that when they found them they destroyed them.
If there are any WMD's in Iraq that ISIS now has hold of, then I'm sorry, but this is truly Bush's fault.
Or the fault of one of the contractors who got paid to eliminate the WMD's, but failed to do so.
To: Nachum
I remember what went down exactly. The USA found hundreds of tons of chemical WMDs, but the UN said we could NOT call that finding WMDs because all of the chemicals were in two separate drums and you had to mix two drums to have the deadly chemical. Because they were not premixed in the drums the UN felt those could not be called chemical WMDs.
That is also how the UN allows other tyrants to have everything and not hold them accountable for their weapons.
True story folks. I remember rolling my eyes reading this about 5-6 or six years into the war.
22 posted on
06/19/2014 6:24:50 PM PDT by
A CA Guy
( God Bless America, God Bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
To: Nachum
To: Nachum
There really isn't any way to determine if the stuff is usable or not without trying. It's certainly dangerous. Destroying the very modest stocks of VX in the U.S. took years and there were accidents even with what were considered adequate safety precautions. This place is far worse. Leaking containers, half-filled munitions - the reason it hasn't been destroyed is that the project would be more difficult, dangerous, and expensive than simply leaving it there.
Until now. Because there will be somebody stupid enough to suit up and go in there for Allah and see if there's something he can drag out. For rational people it would be easier to manufacture Sarin for themselves. These guys aren't rational people.
To: Nachum
The al-Muhanna 'mega-facility', about 60 miles south of Baghdad... ...
the al-Muthanna mega-facility 60 miles north of Baghdad....
Huh?
28 posted on
06/19/2014 6:27:49 PM PDT by
Straight Vermonter
(Posting from deep behind the Maple Curtain)
To: Nachum
Chemical weapons are what they are. There is so many different types. They are very elusive, workied around them in the early 80’s. doesn’t take much to do alot of damage.
32 posted on
06/19/2014 6:33:28 PM PDT by
Busko
(The only thing that is certain is that nothing is certain.)
To: Nachum
For terrorists, dirty bombs and military level chemicals don’t have to be very effective, just using them would set the modern media into a panic frenzy, if they use them here.
35 posted on
06/19/2014 6:46:45 PM PDT by
ansel12
((Ted Cruz and Mike Lee-both of whom sit on the Senate Judiciary Comm as Ginsberg's importance fades)
To: Nachum
Well, duuuuuuuuh! Ya think?
40 posted on
06/19/2014 6:49:48 PM PDT by
bgill
To: Nachum; aposiopetic; rbmillerjr; Lowell1775; JPX2011; NKP_Vet; Jed Eckert; Recovering Ex-hippie; ...
+
Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:
Add me / Remove me
Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of general interest.
49 posted on
06/19/2014 7:03:33 PM PDT by
narses
(Matthew 7:6. He appears to have made up his mind let him live with the consequences.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson