[Vision]

Bm

[Norm Lenhart]

There is a word...maybe two I am looking for here...Starts with an N, second ends with a t...

[jdsteel]

Impossible. Everyone knows that Saddam had no WMD’s. /sarc

[NonValueAdded]

no military value? perhaps no conventional value but, for a terror - let me say that word again: TERROR - organization, I’d say this is the second time they stuck gold.

[cripplecreek]

This issue is up next on Megyn Kelly.

[Sarah Barracuda]

Can’t be true, the left has been saying for 10+ years Saddam had NO chemical weapons..so how can this be true..could it be..the left lied

[NotTallTex]

Saddam didn’t have wmd’s because the liberals said so. Whatever they say, over and over, becomes the truth because in postmodern times, the truth is only what you can convince others it is, nothing more.

[Viennacon]

Apparently the facility contains VX

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VX_%28nerve_agent%29

This nerve agent was classified as a WMD in 1991

[afraidfortherepublic]

Quick! Somebody had better alert Megyn Kelly!

[RushIsMyTeddyBear]

Bear + woods.

[G Larry]

Waiting for confirmation from ABC, CBS, & NBC.........

[who_would_fardels_bear]

The US military was there for years. They had access at one time or another to every square inch of Iraq. They told us that they were looking thoroughly for WMD's and that when they found them they destroyed them.

If there are any WMD's in Iraq that ISIS now has hold of, then I'm sorry, but this is truly Bush's fault.

Or the fault of one of the contractors who got paid to eliminate the WMD's, but failed to do so.

[A CA Guy]

I remember what went down exactly. The USA found hundreds of tons of chemical WMDs, but the UN said we could NOT call that finding WMDs because all of the chemicals were in two separate drums and you had to mix two drums to have the deadly chemical. Because they were not premixed in the drums the UN felt those could not be called chemical WMDs.

That is also how the UN allows other tyrants to have everything and not hold them accountable for their weapons.

True story folks. I remember rolling my eyes reading this about 5-6 or six years into the war.

[Ronaldus Magnus III]

One of my favorite responses to the leftist creepozoids is to show the pictures of the buried-in-the-sand jets under the Iraqi desert. If they could hide the jets, they could hide anything.

http://www.snopes.com/photos/military/sandplanes.asp

[Billthedrill]

There really isn't any way to determine if the stuff is usable or not without trying. It's certainly dangerous. Destroying the very modest stocks of VX in the U.S. took years and there were accidents even with what were considered adequate safety precautions. This place is far worse. Leaking containers, half-filled munitions - the reason it hasn't been destroyed is that the project would be more difficult, dangerous, and expensive than simply leaving it there.

Until now. Because there will be somebody stupid enough to suit up and go in there for Allah and see if there's something he can drag out. For rational people it would be easier to manufacture Sarin for themselves. These guys aren't rational people.

[Straight Vermonter]

The al-Muhanna 'mega-facility', about 60 miles south of Baghdad...

...

the al-Muthanna mega-facility 60 miles north of Baghdad....

Huh?

[Busko]

Chemical weapons are what they are. There is so many different types. They are very elusive, workied around them in the early 80’s. doesn’t take much to do alot of damage.

[ansel12]

For terrorists, dirty bombs and military level chemicals don’t have to be very effective, just using them would set the modern media into a panic frenzy, if they use them here.

[bgill]

Well, duuuuuuuuh! Ya think?

[narses]

+

Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:

Add me / Remove me

Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of general interest.