Posted on 06/19/2014 6:02:11 PM PDT by Nachum
I’d assume there wasn’t a lot of incentive to do so, at least not right away. Getting rid of this stuff (especially if it has degraded and leaked) is a dangerous and expensive undertaking. With the new government in place, and Bush probably not expecting Obama to pull out all the troops, there was no urgency to pay attention to a decommissioned chemical plant from the 90s, much less spend American money to clean it up.
It must have been horrible, having never worn it for more than part of a day seeing them living in that gear really bothered me, in most cases I questioned the wisdom of that.
So far I haven’t seen analysis of the cost versus the gain, of forcing the GIs to stay at that level.
The CIA learned that you cannot just blow up WMD facilities. That is what the US did during the 30 day air campaign prior to Desert Storm. And the CIA discovered it created local environmental catastrophes and killed a lot of people near the facilities. So the ole WMD components have to be disposed of properly. Not just blown up. And what was probably left was held in containers that leaked and could not be safely transported. Leaking containers holding WMD are a problem even here in the US. Research Hanford and WIPP. The old Iraqi facilities needed to be guarded and the public kept away.
A hap, hap, happy overview of good ole VX. I couldn’t find the Nic Cage movie embellishment from The Rock.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9jBU-8Sndj4
ISIS will use POW's to go get the stuff and test it to see if it kills.
If they broke into the facility, they did it for a reason. They seem to have a lot of The March all preplanned out. From what I have read, its been planned out for years.
What do you think they are shipping out of Syria right now, hmmm???
Thats what it sounds like. They’ve chosen their targets carefully, and the quick surrender of the Iraqi forces in Mosul wasn’t in the heat of the moment. The officers were bribed
Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:
Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of general interest.
Anything they can to help the caliphate grow actually. Which is where its all going these days.
Who is this “they” .... Obama’s Washington or the ISIS murderers?
Bribed and threatened no doubt. From what I have read of battle field accounts, they are very tough adversaries. Willing to die in battle. Have no fear. And do not give an inch. No wonder the Iraqi’s ran from that. And they might have brought some of their chlorine gas from Syria. They did overrun one of Assad’s chlorine manufacturing plants. Surprised we have not heard of WMD used by them in Iraq up till now. Knock on wood.....
Sounds like some of the usual pro-Assad/pro-Iran/pro-PootyPoot agitprop we’ve been deluged with since the first big chemical weapons attack made by the Assad regime in its ongoing mass-murder of Syrian citizens.
Yes, there is a problem with leaky containers right here, right now in West Texas.
There is no danger, so says the government.
“If such a facility existed, why didn’t we bulldoze it? “
Perhaps because it was identified and “contained?” If you have limited resources, you must concentrate on the “search” aspect and don’t bother with things you have already “found.” Disposal is someone else’s concern for later. That those people never got around to it...
The al-Muhanna ‘mega-facility’, about 60 miles south of Baghdad...”
“the al-Muthanna mega-facility 60 miles north of Baghdad....”
Was scrolling down to see if anyone else caught that and saw you did. Good work.
Both.
ISIS forces are north of Baghdad, the first sentence (south) is probably wrong.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.