Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cops 'shot 13-year-old boy carrying toy rifle' only 10 SECONDS after first spotting him
dailymail.co.uk ^ | , 26 October 2013 | DAVID MCCORMACK, ASSOCIATED PRESS REPORTER and RYAN GORMAN

Posted on 10/26/2013 1:04:01 AM PDT by moonshinner_09

Cops took no more than 10 seconds to fire six or seven shots into the body of dying teenager Andy Lopez after seeing him with a toy pellet gun. Mr Lopez was spotted by deputies on Tuesday afternoon in Santa Rosa, California, carrying the toy rifle, which they mistakenly thought was a real assault weapon. The time that elapsed between when officers reported the sighting to dispatch and then reported shots fired was only 10 seconds. Hundreds of local residents marched on Wednesday night to remember the popular teen and protest at the senseless shooting. They chanted 'We need justice' as they questioned how the deputies could mistake a pellet gun for an assault rifle.According to a police statement, Lopez was twice instructed to put down his weapon, officers opened fire after he failed to comply - only 10 seconds later. Sixteen seconds later, the cops radioed for medical assistance. Ethan Oliver, who lives across the street, told KTVU.com that the deputies continued to shoot at the boy, even after he had fallen to the ground. Oliver said he went outside after hearing two gun shots and by that time Lopez was already on the ground. ‘Then the cops went at it again and unloaded like six to seven shots,’ he said.When asked if he meant that the deputy shot Lopez while he was on the ground, Oliver said, ‘Yeah. Exactly what I saw.’ Authorities haven't responded to his claims, but it raises the possibility that Lopez was still alive when he hit the ground after the first two shots were fired.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: banglist; california; donutwatch; guncontrol; guns; lopez; moronwithbadge; police; santarosa; secondamendment; standingarmy; stupidcoptricks; warriorcops
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 301-317 next last
To: doorgunner69; rdcbn

“These guns are not toys, they are serious weapons that arms manufactures have spent many years and many millions of development dollars to develop into the most effective weapons possible.

Is that you, Diane Fineswine?”

To be fair only a socialist or govt employee would design a piece of equipment to be ineffective. Still I have to agree he sounds like an anti-gun zealot.


221 posted on 10/26/2013 3:35:04 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies]

To: All

There have been 26 cops killed so far this year, and 1 stabbed. We’re on track for about 120 total killed this year, including car accidents, heart attacks while on duty, etc. At current rates, we’ll probably have under 40 shot nationwide in 2013.

http://www.odmp.org/search/year/2013?ref=sidebar


222 posted on 10/26/2013 3:45:01 PM PDT by Mr Rogers (Liberals are like locusts...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 221 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers

How many civilians and dogs shot so far?


223 posted on 10/26/2013 4:10:17 PM PDT by doorgunner69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies]

To: Tarantulas

Excellent post..one of the few that actually adds something to the discussion.


224 posted on 10/26/2013 5:14:50 PM PDT by mac_truck ( Aide toi et dieu t aidera)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: moonshinner_09
I'd like to hear that the boy's father personally executes those two uniformed nazi vermin, and that the subsequent jury gives him a free pass AND a standing ovation.


/.02

225 posted on 10/26/2013 5:18:40 PM PDT by tomkat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gene Eric

Uh, yeah, I am done with the paraphrasing.

I wrote that out for you because you only read the headline before you started talking.

Thanks for actually reading the article and finding some quotes that apparently prove....something.

I don’t recall saying I “adored” the Police, or that you “hated” the Police.

I did give you some good advice that still stands.

If you don’t like the Police, don’t break the law.


226 posted on 10/26/2013 5:56:52 PM PDT by zeestephen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies]

To: zeestephen

>> I wrote that out for you because you only read the headline before you started talking.

Knock it off. Sometimes I read the excerpts.

>> If you don’t like the Police, don’t break the law.

That’s not something a 13 year old should have to worry about.

The cops got within 30 feet of the kid before making an incredibly bad call.


227 posted on 10/26/2013 6:42:24 PM PDT by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies]

To: zeestephen

The dead kid didn’t break any laws.


228 posted on 10/26/2013 7:13:57 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

What part of “if you point a gun at a cop you’re gonna get shot” are you having trouble understanding?

The “open carry should be legal” bit?
What part of “there is a huge difference in threat between someone open carrying a rifle by pointing it in a safe direction and generally keeping their hands off it vs pointing it AT someone during a tense standoff” are you having trouble understanding?

The “oh, but it wasn’t really a gun, it was a toy” bit?
What part of “what the kid had was indistinguishable from an AK47 short of a hands-on inspection” are you having trouble understanding?

The “oh, but he was just a 13 year old kid” bit?
What part of “teenagers who point illegal guns at cops are too likely to kill someone” are you having trouble understanding?

Sometimes the cops are right to shoot someone, even if it was a tragic misunderstanding and you hate cops.


229 posted on 10/26/2013 7:34:19 PM PDT by ctdonath2 (Making good people helpless doesn't make bad people harmless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2
Sometimes the cops are right to shoot someone, even if it was a tragic misunderstanding

That is a helluva point of view. Let me guess: you are a cop?

By your standards, if a cop points a gun at me and I am not armed, am I justified in arming myself and blowing him away because he threatened me?

Of course, I might have been holding a heat gun working on something, but the cop was threatening me..........."I felt threatened!" seems to work as a defense for them.

230 posted on 10/26/2013 8:21:23 PM PDT by doorgunner69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies]

To: doorgunner69

They don’t count. According to some unless you are a cop, your life has no value. And civilians and dogs are only good for target practice.


231 posted on 10/26/2013 8:29:27 PM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies]

To: NCLaw441
If you were confronted with an unknown person, would you wait 10 seconds before protecting yourself?

It was 10 seconds from reporting sighting to reporting shooting. Add in the time to get out of the car, give the warning, fire 8 shots, and then report the shooting.

That shaves a number of seconds off.

232 posted on 10/26/2013 10:09:30 PM PDT by Ken H (First rule of gun safety - have a gun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

How long are communities supposed to endure emotional and ill prepared cops? And extremely jumpy too!


233 posted on 10/26/2013 10:15:54 PM PDT by fabian (" And a new day will dawn for those who stand long, and the forests will echo in laughter")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: zeestephen

oh..so he turns and within 10 seconds doesn’t react fast, so he is shot for that? Cops know about air soft and pellet guns. He wasn’t aiming the rifle, in a shooting stance, right?


234 posted on 10/26/2013 10:19:47 PM PDT by fabian (" And a new day will dawn for those who stand long, and the forests will echo in laughter")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: fabian

If someone yells at me from behind, I’d turn around too.

Should I be shot for that?


235 posted on 10/26/2013 10:21:16 PM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

that’s right! And he was not in a firing position, right? Good lord.


236 posted on 10/26/2013 10:24:45 PM PDT by fabian (" And a new day will dawn for those who stand long, and the forests will echo in laughter")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

I think it’s obvious we have I’ll trained and cowardly cops all over the place. If they are going to be so careful as to shot anyone with even the tiniest possibility of being a threat, then they are the last people that should be cops!


237 posted on 10/26/2013 10:29:09 PM PDT by fabian (" And a new day will dawn for those who stand long, and the forests will echo in laughter")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies]

To: fabian

BUMP to that!

I totally agree.


238 posted on 10/26/2013 10:30:13 PM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies]

To: mac_truck; Tarantulas
The police were positioned behind the front doors, which means the car was facing the shooter.

Why haven't we seen the dash-cam video?

239 posted on 10/26/2013 11:50:24 PM PDT by Ken H (First rule of gun safety - have a gun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies]

To: Ken H

make that ‘facing the shooting victim’.


240 posted on 10/26/2013 11:52:26 PM PDT by Ken H (First rule of gun safety - have a gun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 239 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 301-317 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson