Rush spent many hours of his program over the years telling us this was going to happen. What next in the scheme of perverted sex will be on the table ... ?
This will go on until until government starts losing money off it(as when people start “marrying” their children to avoid inheritance taxes). Then you’ll see Democrats screaming about “the sacred institution of marriage”.
Slippery slope? I would frankly consider polygamy a step up. There is at least some biological sense to the arrangement.
I’ve never seen gay marriage as a “slippery slope”, it is a complete break, it is the realization of another libertarian victory to add to the 50 year string of them.
Once we have “gay marriage” then what we are really saying is that it is all up to whatever consenting adults want, polygamy has to follow, as will all other variations.
Personally I’m looking forward to this, getting kind of tired of my old wife and would like to liven things up with a model with 20 years less mileage on it. Just can’t afford the alimony so this solves that little problem, just move the old bag to the spare bedroom, maybe service her once a month or so just for old times sake and have a ton of fun with the new one! You just have to learn to enjoy the decline, there’s a silver lining in every dark cloud!
Damn Straight!!!
Gay Marriage is leading the way for me to have several “Partners” and I couldn’t be happier.....
Chicka’s, I think is muh thing and they luvz me.
Bring on the “Monogamy ain’t no thing” . . . thing...
Oh, I bet. Don't thank them, though. Thank the liberals who pushed this because they want to redefine and destroy the traditional family.
“A favorable outcome for marriage equality is a favorable outcome for multi-partner marriage,” she argued, because gay marriage would then provide “precedent” for “other forms of non-traditional relationships.”
Of course. The exact same liberals who argued that legalizing gay marriage is as far as it will go will now be on board fully to redefine marriage again. Afterall, they, by their own definition, wouldn't want to be bigoted and intolerant.
Nightline has done two segments on polygamous relationships since March. In lockstep to continue this insanity towards pre-Biblical days of anything goes. Which worked out really well for women, by the way. Bastards.
many of us were told that we were stupid to mention this years back and told to not mention social issues.
Yea staying silent for those people really worked
Funny think is Polygamy has been around many centuries and was/is the norm for many societies and cultures . Homosexual “unions” have never been a cultural norm or accepted as the norm until this recent push.
I felt she should also support the guy down the street that was in a committed relationship with his German shepherd and wanted to marry her.
Or how about that nice Muslim man across the street that wanted to marry a 13 year old or we could also talk about the woman on the corner that was really in love with her Honda civic.
I told her we all have a line we won't cross, I just chose to draw mine in a different place than she did.
How many people can you marry and put on your medical? Both sexes, too.
Periodic orgies are now marriage.
I don’t care about polygamy that much. It is MUCH more healthy and natural than gay marriage could ever be. Why won’t allow one to have a number of wives if one is able to support them? It is exactly that part of private life lawmakers and government has to stay out of.
The problem is there are numerous other really dangerous perversions such as animal sex and paedophilia. Gay ‘marriage’ is surely a quantum leap in normalizing it.
This is impossible.
And bestiality is not next either.
I’m not sure the Justices of the Supreme Court can logically come up with any legal reason why people who want to be married to more than one person have any less right to it then two males or two females wanting to married.