Posted on 10/23/2012 5:28:42 PM PDT by central_va
By referring to Romney in this way, you're just showing everybody how immature you are.
Romney is smarter than you, Obama and O’Reilly but that’s no disgrace because Mitt Romney happens to be a very smart man.
I don’t agree that playing slow pitch by Romney was very much of a mistake. Obama was primed to have Mitt go to the mound and fast pitch on foreign affairs. Obama was waiting to hit the pitches out of the park because he had all the advantage of being able to say, with his usual I, that he, Obama, has played the fast game by being there with all the other players/enablers who have now apparently joined Obama. Mitt wisely stepped on the mound and told Obama tonight’s game is soft pitch. You might hit a few out of the park but what it all comes down to is a lovely evening to take in and enjoy the ambiance of the USA ballpark even though it is in desperate need of some drastic manicuring. It takes a true dedicated player to recognize the need for improvements to the playing field as compared to some temperamental guy just wanting to swing the bat.
I might after that pathetic performance, humiliating. I am vacillating. It is like choosing between a firing squad and hanging.
Drama Queen.
Mitt's lackluster performance when juxtapositioned against his firebrand debates against both Gingrich and Obama in debate one show the phoniness of Mitts campaign. He better get off his ass because he just gave Obastard an opening. The MSM is going to have a field day with the mush mouthed Mitt.
He let opportunities slide by, there’s no doubt. However, Obama was such a prick during that debate, Romney almost didn’t have to say anything.
Oh yes, another holier than thou purist. You are not the judge of my conservatism, buzz off. We have two choices...make your choice and quit crusising for attention around here. Didn’t Mommy and Daddy pay enough attention to you?
If Mitt can’t lambast the Obama’s administration foreign policy nightmare in a debate then is he really Presidential?
Get the hell off my thread. Mitt sucked and so do you.
Do Presidents think strategically or tactically? Obama looked to be thinking tactically. You can either believe that Romney was thinking strategically or that he’s just soft. His performances in the first two debates and his general aggression towards the Obama Regime throughout his campaign indicates the latter isn’t true.
Obama is thinking and acting tacticly. His perimeter is being over run
Romney is thinking and acting strategically planning and espousing the future.
Days before the debate, the Romney campaign announced Mitt would come out aggressively against O. O took the bait, came out snarling while Mitt sat and took it with a smile on his face. O is as clumsy, politically, as his SecState, Hillary.
Why limit your options? Go for both!
Oh Please, we all ready established you are a brain dead Leftists trolling this site as a fake “Conservative”. No one takes your ranting seriously Infiltrator.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.