Posted on 09/13/2012 9:07:33 PM PDT by Arec Barrwin
Then you tell us what a “mustag” is because it sure as hell doesn’t make sense to me.
To answer your question ... my best guess is no.
mebbe Münzenberg + Reichstag - a little and scramble= mustag
yep, multiple players, multiple outcomes, and the first false flag has been flown by the children in the WhiteHut.
courtesy ping, and Thanks.
Sounds like the Clintons. They were always good at faking movies and sound bites.
The DNC made the film.
The maker doesn’t even exist.
These are the facts as I know them:
“Sam Bacile” doesn’t exist at all.
The claim that 100 Jewish donors contributed $5 million to make such a low-quality movie is a lie,
I have a strong suspicion that the real makers of this movie are Islamists, who wanted to provoke riots against Americans and blame it on an “Israeli Jew”.
These are the facts as I know them:
“Sam Bacile” doesn’t exist at all.
The claim that 100 Jewish donors contributed $5 million to make such a low-quality movie is a lie,
I have a strong suspicion that the real makers of this movie are Islamists, who wanted to provoke riots against Americans and blame it on an “Israeli Jew”.
I have yet to see this video. Anyone have a link?
The plot thickens.
blame it on an “Israeli Jew”.
Yes and toss in Coptic Christians, too.
It could be someone just got a hold of the original footage, edited it and then posted it to YouTube. It would not be hard to do. Someone might have thought it was fun.
If that's what happened, the bit of fun is looking like it has set off WWIII..
there is no record of it except the trailer, hence the mystery
Definitely not a good time to be traveling the world if you are a U.S. citizen. If overseas and you are asked by someone where you are from, say you are Canadian.
How do you define “hoax”?
Yep
Yep. The Canadians always slip away... lol
The movie is a piece of crap.
But it's message is correct: Islam is an abominable and detestable crime against nature!
Today, the Independent is reporting shocking details about the attack on the Libyan consulate that resulted in the death of four Americans, including Ambassador Chris Stevens. The details are so explosive that they will result in a Congressional investigation. In fact, they’re so explosive that they should result in the resignation of Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.
The only question now: What did Hillary Clinton know, and when did she know it?
Yesterday, we reported that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was responsible under the law for the “security
policies and programs that provide for the protection of all US government personnel … on official duty abroad.” Clinton herself seemed bewildered by the attacks on the Libyan consulate, asking, “How could this happen in a country we helped liberate, in a city we helped save from destruction?”
But according to the Independent, she had no reason to be puzzled. Quoting senior diplomatic sources, the paper reports, “the US State Department had credible information 48 hours before mobs charged the consulate in Benghazi, and the embassy in Cairo, that American missions may be targeted.” Nonetheless, “no warnings were given for diplomats to go on high alert and ‘lockdown,’ under which movement is severely restricted.”
It gets worse. According to security sources, the State Department had greenlit a “health check” at the consulate I preparation for 9/11. Nonetheless, the attackers broke the perimeter within 15 minutes of the Libyan mob forming. Local guards did nothing. One witness reported, “The security people just all ran away and the people in charge were the young men with guns and bombs.” According to sources, the Ambassador died from smoke inhalation after he was trapped in a building set on fire and besieged by rioters.
The Libyan government, for all its supposed regret, seems less than troubled by the whole incident. Wissam Buhmeid, who commands the Tripoli government-sanctioned Shield Brigade, which operates as police in Benghazi, stated, “There were definitely people from the security forces who let the attack happen because they were themselves offended by the film; they would absolutely put their loyalty to the Prophet over the consulate.
The deaths are all nothing compared to insulting the Prophet.”
Why wasn’t there better protection at the consulate? Because that’s the way Secretary of State Clinton wanted it; the State Department posted no Marines to the consulate. It was staffed instead by those Libyan “security” forces. The consulate also had “no bulletproof glass, reinforced doors or other features common to embassies.”
Senator Bill Nelson (D-FL), who sits on the Senate Intelligence Committee, “I am asking my colleagues on the committee to immediately investigate what role al-Qa’ida or its affiliates may have played in the attack and to take appropriate action.”
The story isn’t over in Libya. Violence continues. And classified documents have been stolen from the consulate, reportedly including the names of Libyans working with the Americans. Safe houses across Libya are now unsafe.
Secretary of State Clinton is responsible for the security of our staff, consulates, and embassies abroad. If the Independent’s report is correct, she has violated the most basic standard of duty. Both she and her boss, President Obama, must be held responsible.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.