Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Posting the address of TruBlueRinos.com for those FReepers who can no longer stomach FR

Posted on 07/10/2012 2:39:24 PM PDT by Jim Robinson

Received yet another FReepmail message regarding the underground campaign to get disgruntled freepers to move on over to the latest anti-freeper site.

I'll save them the trouble of having their moles to do their underhanded dirty work underground.

If you're totally fed up with me and my absolute refusal to support the GOP-e's outright plunge into supporting the progressive/statist agenda and no longer wish to resist tyranny, please by all means go join the RINO squishes over on TrueBlueRINOS.com ( actual address: http://www.trueblueliberty.com ).

But when you join them, please do us all favor and don't come back. It'll save us all a bunch of grief.

Thanks for the memories. It was fun working with you when we all agreed on our pro-God, pro-Life, pro-family, pro-small government, pro-liberty causes.

By the way, those caught continuing their underground campaigns against FR will be zot on sight.

Like this guy:

-------------------------------------------------------

From Pasadena2k | 07/10/2012 1:22:46 PM PDT new

try a site at which it’s OK to discuss alternatives to Obama at least for a short period during this presidential elction season.

Many of us ( over 550 in the last two months ) spend some of our time at trueblueliberty.com

-------------------------------------------------------

Goodbye, Pasadena, we hardly knew ye.

No one appreciates moles. Filthy animals.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Free Republic; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: antifreepers; backstabbers; bluebloodrepublicans; establishment; filthyanimals; freespeech; gope; ib4tz; moles; poachers; rinosrus; trolls; truebluerinos; zot; zots4romneybots; zzot; zzzot; zzzzot; zzzzzot; zzzzzzot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 401-420421-440441-460 ... 841-844 next last
To: rogue yam; Iscool
Look up "obtuse".

Iscool:Post 327

In the eyes of the globalists such as Romney, we are just people of the World...The United States is one State (not 50) and we as a Country and citizens of that Country are no more important to Romney than Romania or China...

Post 386

This is utterly deranged.

Post 387

Me, WITH LINK: It is arresting to imagine a Romney White House,the clinical separation of decision-making from ideology, the detachment of those decisions from moral consequence, a persistent blind spot for people as people.

And now, I have better things to do than explain a coherent conversation to you.

Gooday.

421 posted on 07/11/2012 12:00:03 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (America! The wolves are here! What will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 419 | View Replies]

To: rogue yam

That was you wasn’t it: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/8/85/Michael_Dukakis_in_tank.jpg


422 posted on 07/11/2012 12:01:27 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 395 | View Replies]

To: Abundy
but what makes you think that :

1 - the moderate/RINO repubs wouldn't work with Obozo

Because they will have just seen the moderate RINO candidate given the heave-ho in no undertain terms, and they won't want to be next. A Romney loss would motivate them to move right in order to save their own skins.

2 -- What does Obama have to worry about in a second term? Weak? Vulnerable? To what?

Vulnerable to the lack of support from those within his own party who see that he is a pariah with whom association poses the real risk of alienating the Democrats who rejected Obama at the ballot box. It's clear that Obama's support is ailing and that many former supporters loath him now. Also, Obama would be vulnerable to a Republican-dominated Congress that will fight him every step of the way and who, if Obama gets a plurality because he lacks this year even 50% of the votes, will be backed up by hard numbers proving that Obama lacked resoundingly a mandate in the popular vote, that the majority of Americans voted "against" him. This kind of Obama scenario would EMPOWER conservatives in every way.

Give Obama a second term and he can pull the plug on the life support that our republic is limping along on...doing far more damage in his second term...damage that would be irreparable.

Folks said that four years ago, and two years ago with predictions that Obama would "outlaw" the midterm elections. With respect, FRiend, that sentiment smacks of panic., and panic is the path to mistakes.

423 posted on 07/11/2012 12:03:07 PM PDT by Finny (A deal with the devil is ALWAYS a losing proposition. Voting for Romney to avoid Obama is just that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 326 | View Replies]

To: Iscool
It's Amazing!

You & others would rather defeat Romney than Obama.

You & others would prefer another 4 years of Obama.

I'm with Rush!

I am a T.E.A. Party Conservative and not voting to defeat Obama is just crazy to me.

424 posted on 07/11/2012 12:04:13 PM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 369 | View Replies]

To: Abundy

Incidentally, Abundy, I GREATLY appreciate your civil, sensible tone. :^) It is a privilege to get to exchange ideas with a right-mannered patriot like you.


425 posted on 07/11/2012 12:04:36 PM PDT by Finny (A deal with the devil is ALWAYS a losing proposition. Voting for Romney to avoid Obama is just that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 326 | View Replies]

To: rogue yam

Hey, don’t blame me if you’re the one backing a guy who is for homosexual marriage, gun bans, and individual mandates.


426 posted on 07/11/2012 12:06:50 PM PDT by Darksheare (You will never defeat Bok Choy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 417 | View Replies]

To: rogue yam
You're kidding, right?

Your posts are rife with name-calling against those you disagree with on this subject. Are you truly so self-deluded that you cannot comprehend the very nature of your own posts?

427 posted on 07/11/2012 12:09:35 PM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 389 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

Check out post 408.
The rhetorical answer to your questions is “no” in fifty foot neon letters that blink, buzz, and move.


428 posted on 07/11/2012 12:21:48 PM PDT by Darksheare (You will never defeat Bok Choy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 427 | View Replies]

To: rogue yam
Romney is presently campaigning against all three of these things.

Who gives a rat's behind what Romney says? What matters is what he has done and if he can be trusted.

You're gullible fool if you think Romney is going to stop gay marriage, put judges on SCOTUS that will overturn Roe and have the guts to stop the funding of Planned Parenthood. He doesn't have the conviction to do any of that.

429 posted on 07/11/2012 12:23:56 PM PDT by Kazan (Mitt Romney: The greater of two evils)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 417 | View Replies]

To: Kazan; rogue yam
Exactly, his record shows that he cannot be trusted at all.
He'll say anything to be elected, and once in he will do whatever he feels like because he has a "mandate" to do it.
430 posted on 07/11/2012 12:29:42 PM PDT by Darksheare (You will never defeat Bok Choy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 429 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare
Check out post 408. The rhetorical answer to your questions is “no” in fifty foot neon letters that blink, buzz, and move.

I'm not sure if he's being obtuse, clueless, a tar baby or all three.

431 posted on 07/11/2012 12:34:10 PM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 428 | View Replies]

To: rogue yam
then we hold all GOP officeholders accountable to conservative principles while in office

You're parroting Rush, who has never held the Republicans feet to the fire once in his entire radio career.

The Republican establishment knows you're bluffing and will always vote for whoever they put up under the premise that Democrat is always going to be worse.

The time to hold Republicans accountable IS NOW. They need to be taught the lesson that nominees like Romney are unacceptable. When they learn that lesson, they will be more than happy to embrace conservatives like Scott Walker.

You keep doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different results. That makes you insane.

432 posted on 07/11/2012 12:34:10 PM PDT by Kazan (Mitt Romney: The greater of two evils)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 417 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare
Exactly, his record shows that he cannot be trusted at all.

He'll say anything to be elected, and once in he will do whatever he feels like because he has a "mandate" to do it.

**********************************

Exactly right. With Romney, the only thing that can be relied on as an indication of future performance is his record. He may be the most driven politician of our lifetime.

He's been running for president his entire life.

433 posted on 07/11/2012 12:37:10 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 430 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

*raises eyebrow*

...all three?
Probably.


434 posted on 07/11/2012 12:37:47 PM PDT by Darksheare (You will never defeat Bok Choy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 431 | View Replies]

To: rogue yam
However now, just because we had no attractive, unifying conservative standard-bearer step forward to run for the 2012 GOP nomination, the ABRs on this site want to declare that the greatest grassroots conservative movement of our lifetimes is finished, and the whole Republic is doomed.

We're definitely going to continue to drift to the left until we have a conservative in the White House. Romney's election will eliminate that possibility for eight years.

435 posted on 07/11/2012 12:38:42 PM PDT by Kazan (Mitt Romney: The greater of two evils)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 399 | View Replies]

To: trisham

He has to not only run against his opponent, but himself.
And himself from five minutes ago, and two hours ago.


436 posted on 07/11/2012 12:39:22 PM PDT by Darksheare (You will never defeat Bok Choy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 433 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW
You quote from a leftist pro-Obama campaign piece in a leftist New York magazine, and treat the leftist author's claims as if they are plain evidence of something important about the GOP nominee. And you do this on a site that calls itself "America's premier conservative web forum".

Why do you do this? Simple.

Your extreme antipathy toward the GOP nominee has robbed you of your reason, your intellect, and your integrity. Period.

Me, I don't care about what some leftist yutz says in NYMagazine today, yesterday, or tomorrow. Why is that? Because I know that leftists lie everywhere and always, and the fact that the GOP nominee is suboptimal changes that not a whit for me.

You claim that posting leftist propaganda on FR constitutes "coherent conversation". I say you lie. Poorly.

437 posted on 07/11/2012 12:40:04 PM PDT by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 421 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare

You have nothing intelligent to say and you know it.


438 posted on 07/11/2012 12:42:20 PM PDT by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 426 | View Replies]

To: rogue yam; DJ MacWoW; trisham; Kazan; dirtboy

“and your integrity”?

Romney HAS no integrity!
His record is one of a liberal, a proven SOLID liberal.
Talk to us about integrity again?


439 posted on 07/11/2012 12:42:44 PM PDT by Darksheare (You will never defeat Bok Choy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 437 | View Replies]

To: rogue yam

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2905011/posts?page=312#312

And once again you prove taht what you said in the above post is a lie.
With your own words.


440 posted on 07/11/2012 12:43:42 PM PDT by Darksheare (You will never defeat Bok Choy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 438 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 401-420421-440441-460 ... 841-844 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson