Posted on 07/10/2012 2:39:24 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
Received yet another FReepmail message regarding the underground campaign to get disgruntled freepers to move on over to the latest anti-freeper site.
I'll save them the trouble of having their moles to do their underhanded dirty work underground.
If you're totally fed up with me and my absolute refusal to support the GOP-e's outright plunge into supporting the progressive/statist agenda and no longer wish to resist tyranny, please by all means go join the RINO squishes over on TrueBlueRINOS.com ( actual address: http://www.trueblueliberty.com ).
But when you join them, please do us all favor and don't come back. It'll save us all a bunch of grief.
Thanks for the memories. It was fun working with you when we all agreed on our pro-God, pro-Life, pro-family, pro-small government, pro-liberty causes.
By the way, those caught continuing their underground campaigns against FR will be zot on sight.
Like this guy:
-------------------------------------------------------
From Pasadena2k | 07/10/2012 1:22:46 PM PDT new
try a site at which it’s OK to discuss alternatives to Obama at least for a short period during this presidential elction season.
Many of us ( over 550 in the last two months ) spend some of our time at trueblueliberty.com
-------------------------------------------------------
Goodbye, Pasadena, we hardly knew ye.
No one appreciates moles. Filthy animals.
So yeah, another “feminist”.
*****************************
Please. The feminist movement has always been a tool of the Left.
As long as more than 2 parties exist, by definition, it isn’t binary. It doesn’t matter what you think of the outlying parties’ odds of success, it is not a binary choice.
I called directly to the top for this several months ago, as soon as it became clear that Romney was pulling away with the nomination.
I was told pointedly that there would be absolutely no room on FR for those who thought supporting the GOP nominee was best for America.
Then there was the so-called "truce" that was utterly ill-formed and incoherent and failed to address any of the real issues at hand.
Now here we are, doing what we're doing.
Oh, well. At least we're making the DUmmies, the commies, Team Obama, the rent-seekers, the moochers, and the jihadis happy.
Jim,
There is another line of reasoning concerning the November election:
The founders intended for government to be constrained by rule of law, and provided a Constitution designed to create suitable boundaries. Since then, we have had weak leaders and strong leaders, men of integrity, and men sold into vile corruption; but as long as the rule of law was preserved, and Constitutional limits observed, the Republic could survive these human shortcomings. I am well aware that the fabric has strained over the past hundred years, (arguably since Lincoln, or even Marbury vs. Madison?), and I work ( as you do) towards reestablishing Constitutional limits on Federal authority. But as long as participants in the political process defer to rule of law, we have a hope of restoring the Republic.
Our current President is unlike previous occupants of the White House in that he does not merely seek to enact legislation, or pursue an agenda; but rather, he strives always for the mastery, for political power, and for the abrogation of legal limits on his own authority. He has created a clique of political apparatchiks within the various Federal agencies which abet his desires, and he has developed political power within the fourth estate and the Democratic Party which render him largely immune to criticism or the consequences of his actions. In short, BHO appears to be a revolutionary intent on establishing a personal, dictatorial rule by whatever means are necessary.
While we may argue based upon his behavior whether he is socialist or Marxist, Muslim or atheist, anti-colonial or merely gangster, we have no instance where he did not react forcefully to any attempt to limit his personal power. He uses czars and recess appointments to evade the Senate’s ‘advise and consent’ powers (Article II, Section 2), he deigns to enforce laws or not enforce laws based upon his personal predilection (DOMA and immigration), he refuses to consult Congress when commiting acts of war (Article I, Section 8 and War powers), his DOJ and DOI secretaries both defy Congressional subpoenas, he demonizes any branch of government which opposes him, he strengthens Patriot Act and other provisions which allow him to personally make the life or death decisions, he plays multinational institutions against Constitutional liberties (the UN against Arizona over immigration), and he publicly demagogues how he will act without Congress. All the while building up his power base and destabilizing the government with Unions, state supported voter fraud, and Communist/Marxist/revolutionary movements. One might easily make the case that all of his efforts are designed to overcome the rule of law and establish the personal rule of BHO.
As such, BHO is a threat to the very life of the Republic in a way that the US has not experienced up to now. Like a Hitler, or a Chavez, or a Castro, every day that BHO remains in office is a day that he may use his authority to undermine the rule of law. While Romney has never been my candidate, and remains a very poor choice for the Republican nominee (much less POTUS), Romney is not a threat to the rule of law or an envoy of complete destruction to the Constitutional Republic. Romney lacks the political power, the driving ambition, and the amoral, sociopathic detachment necessary to become a world historical villain.
For those of us who see Obama as the beginning of the US principate, or our first revolutionary dictator, the choice is pretty clear. We MUST get rid of him before he completes his mission. I think I speak for a lot of conservatives when I say that I don’t like this choice, but I will stop the dictator before he becomes Hitler.
Do you recall the "truce"?
Therefore what?
I would disagree - 'Feminism', as it is popularly defined, is directly in opposition to what was. It tears at matriarchy, and every single tool, convention, and tradition that once were the pillars thereof. What you have described is not feminism.
Your Reply #394 makes absolutely no sense.
Have a nice day.
No. With Obama we have no chance. With Romney we have a chance. Nothing silly about that.
That post does not say what you claim it says.
I didn’t parrot chit. Nor do I parrot chit. I speak for myself and no other man.
My ability to send mail or converse with my state board was taken away without cause.
Awesome. No Romney for me.
Of course.
I agree.
He is for banning guns, homosexual marriage, Romneycare/Obamacare.
Romney is presently campaigning against all three of these things. Obama is in favor of all three. Those are the facts.
But hey, we’re supposed to just follow him, right?
No.
And then what?
My proposal is simple and has remained unchanged throughout this whole election (and prior elections as well). I think that conservatives need to take over control of the GOP from the grassroots up. We nominate true conservatives wherever possible in our primaries, then we support the GOP up and down the ticket on election day, then we hold all GOP officeholders accountable to conservative principles while in office, and target the RINOs in the primaries during the next cycle.
Rinse and repeat.
This approach is working. It is the only approach that can work. All of the doom-mongering is for fools and fantasists and commie double-agents.
The fact that we didn't get a conservative GOP nominee for President this cycle is to a certain extent a tragedy, but it does not justify abandoning reason.
We had Conservatives in this race, people like you chased them out.
Bullsnort! All of our declared candidates were deeply flawed. I worked for two of them (Cain and then Gingrich). I was ABR throughout the primaries and only became ABO once Romney pulled away with the nomination.
If you start by learning to say fewer false things, you might eventually learn to say fewer crazy and stupid things.
Done, FRiend. Thanks!
You are bluffing.
You have nothing intelligent to say and you know it.
If you thought you could make some point, any point, you would try to do so.
You know that you can't, so you don't even try.
You fool no one, not even the other rabid ABRs.
Of course not!
Nobody likes being proven a liar with their own words.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.