Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/12/2012 6:28:27 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
To: Kaslin

The young voted for this fundamental change.


2 posted on 05/12/2012 6:30:10 AM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

More Baby Boomers now “have” to work, whereas many “kids these days” can just live with Mom and/or Dad.


7 posted on 05/12/2012 6:40:38 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Are baby-boomers “stealing jobs,” or are they 1)showing up on time 2)consistently 3)with tasks/projects completed on time? Do they 4)have experience and knowledge that the younger set has not yet accumulated? 5)Do they text or do Facebook all day long?

Is it considered “job-stealing” to work to pay your bills and plan your retirement? Or, are baby-boomers being “given the shaft” for being so bold as to exist?


8 posted on 05/12/2012 6:40:58 AM PDT by Clara Lou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

I’m 61 and I’m gonna work until they nail the lid shut.

I guess that makes me an enemy of the people.


9 posted on 05/12/2012 6:42:38 AM PDT by joeystoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

First one to the table gets the most.

Early bird gets the worm.

Early to bed, early to rise, makes a man healthy, wealthy, and wise.

All things come to he who waits.


10 posted on 05/12/2012 6:42:50 AM PDT by csmusaret (Obama's new slogan: "Fo Mo Mo Fo.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

That’s a lot of jobs for the boomers. I didn’t know there were that many Wal-Mart greeter positions available.


15 posted on 05/12/2012 6:48:56 AM PDT by umgud (No Rats, No Rino's)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

If an employer is willing to overlook what can sometimes be a cost hit to the group health plan in hiring an older employee, and that older employee manages to get past the sometimes blatant bias directed toward them, then I’d say the older employees are regarded as the better hire.

Younger hires cost less, but are losing out. What might tjis mean, that their value is suspect despite their lower cost? I’d say yes, in general. Work ethic and ethics in general are fading, but are still present generally speaking, among the 50+ age cohort, all the negative Boomer stereotyping aside.

You can’t have something stolen from you, that never belonged to you to begin with.


17 posted on 05/12/2012 6:50:09 AM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Strife, strife, and more strife: race, sex, class, age. Divide and conquer, eh, Mr. President Pissboy?


19 posted on 05/12/2012 6:53:03 AM PDT by the invisib1e hand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
I am a Boomer approaching an early retirement. I am retiring not only for my own personal reasons, but I do want to provide my younger subordinates with an opportunity.

With that said, I will note that my generation and older valued hard work, diigence, and that you had to earn your promotions. The young now are an "entitlement generation" who embody the opposite. That may not be a popular opinion here, but as a Manager for 20 years is my observation.

FRegards...

20 posted on 05/12/2012 6:54:28 AM PDT by catfish1957 (My dream for hope and change is to see the punk POTUS in prison for treason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
Interesting stuff.

Move Over Boomers -- Gen-X And Gen-Y in the Coming Decades - January 25, 2004

24 posted on 05/12/2012 7:00:59 AM PDT by meadsjn (Sarah 2012, or sooner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Other than the brave individuals that sacrifice themselves for their country, most youngers have definite labor and responsibility issues. Their parents take care of their needs and wants so there is little to no incentive. I’d hire a 55 year old with a family to feed in a heartbeat over some idiot 22 year old with nothing more to pay for than beer and cigs.


27 posted on 05/12/2012 7:10:02 AM PDT by albie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

I feel they are stealling jobs from me.


28 posted on 05/12/2012 7:11:25 AM PDT by television is just wrong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

I am thinking that maybe the best path to a strong nation is not to divide people into groups and then pit the groups against one another: race v. race, gender v. gender, generation v. generation, religion v. religion, working v. stay at home, class v. class, etc. We seem to be going more towards tribalism and pack thinking and away from individualism and freedom.


39 posted on 05/12/2012 7:16:52 AM PDT by Anima Mundi (ENVY IS JUST PASSIVE, LAZY GREED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

My wife, a boomer who rarely misses a day, works with a number of young women. They take a day off for a hangnail. Then, when someone else takes a day off, they complain about always having to fill in for them. Of course, they are libs.


40 posted on 05/12/2012 7:17:00 AM PDT by Right Wing Assault (Dick Obama is more inexperienced now than he was before he was elected.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
With the government STEALING our retirement funds, and our healthcare, why shouldn't the boomers STEAL the jobs? A lot of the "young" people don't really want a job, at least not one that involves work of any kind.

Employers want dependable people with a good work ethic, if the boomers fill that need better than the "young", then so be it.

Besides, you'd have to define (which) "young".

Maybe the boomers are actually out looking for jobs (in order to eat) instead of living in their parents home and playing video games all day.
41 posted on 05/12/2012 7:18:02 AM PDT by FrankR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

I am thinking that maybe the best path to a strong nation is not to divide people into groups and then pit the groups against one another: race v. race, gender v. gender, generation v. generation, religion v. religion, working v. stay at home, class v. class, etc. We seem to be going more towards tribalism and pack thinking and away from individualism and freedom.


42 posted on 05/12/2012 7:18:13 AM PDT by Anima Mundi (ENVY IS JUST PASSIVE, LAZY GREED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
One thing about that chart is that it doesn't break down how many 55+ workers actually did lose their jobs, but then simply stopped looking for work - allowing the BLS to eagerly drop them from the unemployment calculations. The lower age brackets are far more likely to go on unemployment and state they are still looking for work - the older workers often just give up. So the whole thesis of the article is questionable.

If there is any division in the ranks, it shouldn't be boomers vs. younger workers but private sector workers who have lost their jobs due to the massive tax and regulatory structures required to feed and expand the porcine Federal and state bureaucracies vs. the beneficiaries of all of that government largesse.

46 posted on 05/12/2012 7:20:50 AM PDT by Mr. Jeeves (CTRL-GALT-DELETE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

I retired at 61 as the auto industry imploded in late 08.
That was definitely earlier than I had planned to leave but I’m enjoying it immensely. I think we emphasize finances too much vs the other things you get to enjoy, the gift of low stress, lots of time to do things you enjoy, etc. Things that don’t have to be expensive.

As for the “under 30” crowd, we shouldn’t paint them with too broad a brush. I hang out at an auto service shop that employs about 10 guys, most of them 25 to 35 age bracket and they all work darn hard.


50 posted on 05/12/2012 7:23:49 AM PDT by nascarnation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Nobody wants to hire a wet-behind-the-ears idiot that has no clue about real work. America’s learning institutions are pushing out about 10 percent of a functional workforce. JMHO


51 posted on 05/12/2012 7:23:49 AM PDT by eyedigress ((zOld storm chaser from the west)/?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
This has nothing to do with the Obama administration being a boon for workers 55+...It has to do that many folks are not retiring at the age of 65 because they need the money due to the bad economic times.

Also companies are trying to keep their older, more experienced, and more productive work force.

62 posted on 05/12/2012 7:46:26 AM PDT by jveritas (God bless our brave troops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson