no question some fags hate themselves...especially if there is an R after their name
creeps
STFU.
Yawn. Same bogus “social science” claptrap we’ve heard from liberal academia pushing an agenda forever.
If the alleged same sex attraction is there, but unacknowledged, then how can they even know it is there?
You can say anything unacknowleged is there. It’s a baseless assertion.
“Homophobia” is a fake term, so any article beginning with this false premise is not worth 2 seconds to read it.
Maybe I can tell you what I think once I stop laughing so hard!
My observation is that most people called, "homophobes" by homosexuals truthfully are repelled by queers and their lifestyle -- but do not "fear" them at all.
"Homophobia": almost as egregious a misnomer as "Gay"...
The term ‘homophobia’ manifests the perverse thinking of homosexuals.
When used as a childish taunt, they fully recognize a large percentage of the audience so labeled will never acquiesce to homosexuality or condone their behavior or thinking. To that group of normal people, the homosexual in open rebellion simply seeks to throw a verbal insult with impunity. They could care less if it is true or not,..just something they can claim to win or make a draw from a verbal altercation. (The same way an effeminate homosexual attempts to win an argument.)
Another audience receiving the label by homosexuals, as ‘homophobes’, are those who are sincerely conscientiously seeking a resolution of conflict between the perverted homosexual lifestyle and normalcy, but rather than becoming adversarial or dogmatic against homosexuality, are likely to become lukewarm in their acceptance of such criminal behavior. To the homosexual, such an audience becomes less of a threat to their homosexual lifestyle by attacking them first, and overcoming any willpower to oppose the homosexual agenda. It’s basically an offensive tactic to cause their adversary to become defensive. Once defensive, the homosexual then attempts to claim equality with heterosexual behavior with an additional arrogant appearance of insolence. It lessens opposition to their political agenda, and possibly may even open doors to attract sexual victims to their agendas.
Another group the their audience to be so labeled, are indeed week willed people who really don’t know what homosexuality means, implies, or why it has historically been criminal through human history. That weak willed group is also likely to become future fodder for the homosexual recruitment campaign. When the mantra of ‘homophobia’ is repeated enough, even those who fall victim of homosexual advances, later fear repercussions from either heterosexuals or homosexuals, and their personal testimony of the inherent degenerate nature of homosexuality is less likely to be brought into public light, avoiding public scrutiny.
In a nutshell, only sexually immoral people condone the term ‘homophobia’, which promotes more ignorance of degenerate criminal sexual immorality. An academic institution favoring the term simply manifests its promotion of ignorance and lack of subjectivity in reporting actual phenomenon.
Stuff and nonsense created to transfer guilt and blame from the person doing things forbidden by God to the upright person who takes the stand that it is wrong.
Where one likes to stick one’s whacker for fun is one of the least interesting or important things about a person.
Because I find these fairies sick, demented, disgusting, perverted and mentally ill, somehow I am a phobic and I want to be gay!!?? LMAO....
These people, and anyone that agrees with this junk, are as sick as the faggots themselves.
Self-identified homosexuals’ heterophobia stems from abuse from an older member of the same sex, difficulty with their parents and members of the opposite sex, and a self-loathing of “breeders”.
This study sounds like pure projection.
One would have to first buy into the premise that homophobia even exists. This 'study' accepts the fallacy hook line and sinker and then goes on to 'prove' a generalization, one of the reasons; it does this 'proving' by subjectively questioning and testing a sample of 160 students and from this population determining subjectively which students are secretly latent homosexuals.
This 'study' and its results are pure liberal humanistic psycho babble garbage.
The article deserves a mega big barf alert.
Not sure how this would be a bad thing. Some of the most anti-drug people were former drug addicts. Aren’t the sodomites themselves, the ones most familiar with the tremendous damage and deadly aspects of the lifestyle choice? Then it would be logical that some who are the strongest against homosexual behavior would be ones familiar with it ( just like ex-smokers).
I think God hates homosexuality. I think he destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah for it. I think God tells us that homosexuality is God's penalty to societies such as those of the Greeks for refusing to acknowledge his command on their lives and turning to idols instead. The first chapters of the book of Romans, as well as many other passages of the Bible, give me no choice on what to believe on that if I want to call myself a Bible-believing Christian.
I have no “fear” of homosexuals, and unlike many conservatives, I don't even have any particular revulsion for them. That's because I've known lots of homosexuals and lesbians, all the way back to high school, due to attending some pretty liberal schools. I've also known politically conservative Republicans who were homosexual, going back to the mid-1980s when whether to tolerate homosexuality was still a debate in conservative Republican circles. Prior to becoming an evangelical, I couldn't have cared less what two men or two women did in their own bedrooms. God requires me to have a very different stand on homosexuality than the one I would prefer to have.
That's where my energy comes from on this issue — not fear, but following the crystal clear warnings of Scripture on this issue.
God's Word required me to change my views about lots of things, and tolerance for homosexuality was one of them. Homosexuality is evil because God says it's evil, and that's the end of the issue.
What do you, EveningStar, think about the above, and why?
There is no such thing as homophobia!