Skip to comments.
Constitutional Work Around: New Jersey Legislators Move To Ban Ammunition
SHTF Plan ^
| 1-30-2012
| Mac Slavo
Posted on 01/30/2012 1:45:21 PM PST by blam
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-65 next last
1
posted on
01/30/2012 1:45:28 PM PST
by
blam
To: blam
Some folks simply need a baseball bat upside the head.
There is no constitutional difference between an arbitrary ban on ammunition and any other infringement on our 2nd Amendment rights.
2
posted on
01/30/2012 1:52:24 PM PST
by
G Larry
(We need Bare Knuckles Newt to fight this battle.)
To: blam
Oh hell...that means more New Jersians will be moving down here...
I can see their new car tags...instead of "The Garden State", it will be "The UNArmed State"...(criminals welcome).
3
posted on
01/30/2012 1:52:52 PM PST
by
FrankR
(You are only enslaved to the extent of the entitlements you receive.)
To: blam
The 2nd Amendment protects arms, not âgunsâ. Arms includes ammunition.
4
posted on
01/30/2012 1:55:35 PM PST
by
Durus
(You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality. Ayn Rand)
To: blam
L Grace Spencer (S) 29 is an absolute Idiot!
5
posted on
01/30/2012 1:56:03 PM PST
by
mongo141
To: blam
I was just at a local sporting goods store this afternoon, looking at a S&W M&P 15-22, and the owners said they’re already gearing up for the next run on guns and ammo. Legislation like this won’t help — better get it while you can.
6
posted on
01/30/2012 1:56:03 PM PST
by
AnglePark
To: blam
It’s becoming very stylish to be a scofflaw!!
7
posted on
01/30/2012 1:56:21 PM PST
by
jakota
(jakota)
To: marktwain
8
posted on
01/30/2012 1:57:51 PM PST
by
MissMagnolia
(Being powerful is like being a lady. If you have to tell people you are, you aren't. (M.Thatcher))
To: blam
There are very few cartridges that have NOT been chambered in T/C Contender and Encore handguns.
9
posted on
01/30/2012 1:58:50 PM PST
by
MileHi
( "It's coming down to patriots vs the politicians." - ovrtaxt)
To: jakota
Its becoming very stylish to be a scofflaw!!
There's no way to rule innocent men. The only power any government has is to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren't enough criminals, one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws. Who wants a nation of law-abiding citizens? What's there in that for anyone? But just pass the kinds of laws that can neither be observed nor enforced nor objectively interpreted - and you create a nation of lawbreakers - and then you cash in on guilt. Now that's the system, Mr. Rearden, that's the game, and once you understand it, you'll be much easier to deal with.
-- From Ayn Rand's Atlas Shrugged
10
posted on
01/30/2012 2:02:33 PM PST
by
OneWingedShark
(Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
To: FrankR
Yeah, I'm beginning to think that we need to ban all yankees, Califreaks and other Westcoasters from the South. If they want to screw up their own states let them, just don't bring that crap down here.
We need to put signs on our state borders: "This is Texas, libtards need not apply (we've already got enough of them)."
11
posted on
01/30/2012 2:04:10 PM PST
by
Sudetenland
(Anybody but Obama!!!!)
To: blam
12
posted on
01/30/2012 2:05:08 PM PST
by
EGPWS
(Trust in God, question everyone else)
To: blam
13
posted on
01/30/2012 2:05:23 PM PST
by
92nina
To: blam
Americans are idiots if the cannot see that the communists are overthrowing our Constitutional promise of the right to protect ourselves. The entire Democrat machine are communists with many RINOs. Stop pulling punches before it is too late and we will never come back.
To: 92nina
I have a better idea than all of these -
let’s make crime illegal.
15
posted on
01/30/2012 2:08:14 PM PST
by
MrB
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
To: trussell
16
posted on
01/30/2012 2:09:52 PM PST
by
EGPWS
(Trust in God, question everyone else)
To: G Larry
Yeah, I'm sure that, as long as we can maintain at least 4 conservatives and Kennedy in the court, this would absolutely fail the constitutionality test. It violates the intent of the 2nd amendment as clearly as any gun ban does. . . BUT . . . NJ residents had better wake up and NJ gun owners had better get active as hell or NJ will find a way to make life even more miserable for you.
Heck, it was while we were living in NJ (64-68) that my parents gave me my first rifle. And a couple of us kids always had BB guns. It's amazing what a few decades of liberalism can do to a state.
17
posted on
01/30/2012 2:10:02 PM PST
by
Sudetenland
(Anybody but Obama!!!!)
To: blam
I don’t understand the problem with armor piercing rounds.
After all, what if I need to kill someone wearing body armor?
Another reason I am happy I left Jersey.
18
posted on
01/30/2012 2:10:13 PM PST
by
Never on my watch
(As a matter of fact, IT IS something worth getting angry over!)
To: blam
Apparently, the legislature feels that they must move to ban ammunition before the ammunition moves to ban them; an irrational fear, but...one they obviously entertain. Among the virtual plethora of things they fail to realize is that a move to ban ammunition — far from preempting a move of ammunition banning the legislature — may well trigger it. In this way, in their overreach, they actually make construct the one foundation upon which their formerly-irrational fear may become dreadful reality.
It’s like watching an old monster movie, and there’s that moment when the girl hears a weird noise, and the wannabe hero dude grabs a flashlight and heads off into the darkness to find out what it was.
You don’t have to be Cecil B. deMille to write the next scene; it’s comin’ atcha like an express freight train; high-ball with lights and horns blaring.
If the Jersey State legislature were all Muslims, we’d observe that they were setting themselves up to be martyred for a more insidious cause.
I say to my Jersey FReinds, “Don’t get incited to take their bait!” Keep mum, wait, and give ‘em both barrels at the ballot box. THAT’S kickin’ it old school.
19
posted on
01/30/2012 2:12:06 PM PST
by
HKMk23
(YHVH NEVER PLAYS DEFENSE)
To: blam
From the esteemed
The assemblywoman cited the clash between busness and environmental interests as the main battle zone.
Business and economics are oftentimes not on the same page with the environment, and people on the economic side are trying to create opportunities at the expense of the environment, she said. Our charge is to explore how our economic opportunities can complement and enhance the environment.
I’m not for overdevelopment, the new chair added. In our own little way we are affecting climate change with overdevelopment and losing our open spaces. We need to be creating more green spaces.
http://www.politickernj.com/53942/spencer-takes-over-environmental-committee
Her webpage: http://www.njleg.state.nj.us/members/bio.asp?leg=288
20
posted on
01/30/2012 2:13:03 PM PST
by
wac3rd
(Somewhere in Hell, Ted Kennedy snickers....)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-65 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson