Posted on 12/30/2011 7:50:10 AM PST by TBBT
You know, I was all set to disagree with you, but your expert use of capitalization has convinced me otherwise.
With that many capital letters, you must be right.
But . . . but that's different.
You're giving Clinton way too much credit. Newt was speaker of the House and pushed Clinton to compromise. Do you really think a balanced budget and welfare reform would have occurred without Newt? Is there really anybody else that could have pressured Clinton like that? I doubt it.
A balanced budget did not occur either with or without Newt. Our national debt has increased each and every year since 1969. It was a lie when Clinton took credit for a budget surplus. Why isn’t it a lie when Gingrich does the same thing?
Begins?! Remember Nixon, Rockefeller, GHW Bush, Dole, Dubya, McCain?
I vote 3rd party if that’s my choice. Bushes, Dole, McStain.....no more. Won’t hold my nose and vote again.
Hank
Never, ever, under any circumstance, would I vote for Mitt Romney.
“A balanced budget did not occur either with or without Newt. Our national debt has increased each and every year since 1969. It was a lie when Clinton took credit for a budget surplus. Why isn’t it a lie when Gingrich does the same thing?”
There were actually a few years in the late 90s when we ran a surplus for the year, but it’s true that we didn’t make a huge dent in the overall federal debt during that time. The point, however, is that if Newt was not speaker, we would not have reduced (or not increased) spending to the point where we actually had annual surpluses. Just look at the retards we have running the House GOP today, they don’t have to stomach to trim the budget even a couple billion dollars, let alone tackle our $1.5 trillion annual deficit. And welfare reform-this is another thing he deserves credit for, he put it on Clinton’s desk 3 times and Clinton finally signed it.
Newt’s not my candidate, I’m going with Perry. But you need to give credit where it’s due. Newt’s record as Speaker is pretty damn good considering he was fighting a Dem POTUS the whole time. I will definitely take that record over RINO Romney and his “progressive” governing style in Mass any day.
Except to Huntsman who was the true conservative with widespread moderate support AND had the best chance of beating Obama. Exactly what Republicans tell you that they had been looking for all these years. Unfortunately, they didn’t seem to want to find it in 2012. lol
I just don’t think Gingrich is anywhere as strong as you think he is. I prefer the other Pennsylvanian, Santorum!
You are so right, and that's why we need Santorum as the non-Romney. No one else is feasible, and he is the longest of longshots.
Rockefeller was never a presidential nominee, but his ideas were stolen by other bigwigs in the party. At the end of his own career, Goldwater had also gone soft on Rockefeller.
You forgot Eisenhower and Ford too.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.