Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Celestial population boom - Large meteoroids probably more common than telescopic surveys suggest
Science News ^ | September 4th, 2009 | Sid Perkins

Posted on 09/09/2009 9:48:17 PM PDT by neverdem

The number of car-to-house-sized meteoroids whizzing through the Earth’s neighborhood is about 10 times higher than Earth-based telescopic surveys suggest, a new study reveals.

That finding, reported online August 28 and in an upcoming Journal of Geophysical Research–Planets, comes from analyses of recently declassified data on infrasonic waves in the atmosphere detected between November 1960 and April 1972. The network of instruments collecting the data was originally designed to detect low-frequency sound waves produced by aboveground nuclear tests, says Elizabeth Silber, a planetary physicist at the University of Western Ontario in London, Canada.

But during the 13-year period, the instruments also detected infrasonic waves produced by 13 meteoroids. Such waves are generated in prodigious amounts as extraterrestrial objects blaze through the upper atmosphere, where many shatter before reaching the Earth’s surface (SN: 7/19/03, p. 36). The waves can travel thousands of kilometers because they aren’t effectively damped by the atmosphere...

(Excerpt) Read more at sciencenews.org ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Testing
KEYWORDS: astronomy; catastrophism; meteoroids

1 posted on 09/09/2009 9:48:17 PM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Something to look forward to, I suppose...


2 posted on 09/09/2009 9:50:14 PM PDT by null and void (We are now in day 231 of our national holiday from reality. - 0bama really isn't one of US.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

We should do the same thing to these asteroids that French farmers due to snails invading their vegetable gardens - devour them all.

There is enough platinum group metals in an average-sized asteroid to equal in worth the entire annual global output. That is a lot of money. Intriguingly, we have the technology to do this NOW!

I say, let’s go get those space rocks before they get us!


3 posted on 09/09/2009 9:54:42 PM PDT by SatinDoll (NO Foreign Nationals as our President!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: El Gato; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Robert A. Cook, PE; lepton; LadyDoc; jb6; tiamat; PGalt; Dianna; ...
Hybrid nano material targets antibiotic resistant bacteria

Velcro on steroids - Researchers design steel analog of well-known fastener

Drug Control Becomes Speech Control

Experimental Drug Shows Promise for Several Cancers

FReepmail me if you want on or off my health and science ping list.

4 posted on 09/09/2009 10:03:50 PM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi minh oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

Ping


5 posted on 09/09/2009 10:15:11 PM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi minh oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: null and void; neverdem; cogitator; sionnsar; CholeraJoe; AFPhys; xcamel; steelyourfaith
They are discussing “house-sized” meteoroids here.

We know Jupiter was hit by the Shoemaker-Levy comet, then a second major collision (making a earth-sized hole in its upper atmosphere) about 12 years later. Saturn's rings got plugged by a large “something” earlier this year - large enough to create a long dust plume of material pulled from the ring. So figure 1 planet-busting collision in Saturn or Jupiter every five years. We know that many have hit!

Earth seems largely missed though - the AZ Meteor Crater was about 50,000 years ago - and I know of none more recently than that.

So - how large a hole (megaton bomb range ??) do these “car-sized rocks” make?

Why would we not see 100 to 300 “recent” craters from these speckling the surface - if they really were as frequent as this article implies?

6 posted on 09/10/2009 8:14:42 AM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE

Why would we not see 100 to 300 “recent” craters from these speckling the surface - if they really were as frequent as this article implies?


http://geology.com/meteor-impact-craters.shtml


7 posted on 09/10/2009 8:17:39 AM PDT by PeterPrinciple ( Seeking the truth here folks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: PeterPrinciple

Oh I absolutely grant those: The most recent being 50,000 years ago though.

But, if these car-sized collisions are causing the sonic booms (the atmospheric vibrations talked about in the article above) as frequently as indicated, where are the “house” and “apartment building” collisions that would cause craters over the last 49,000 years?

Would erosion, glciers, water impact “splashes”, and Arctic-Antarctic impacts being that that many medium-sized holes?

Hiroshima and Nagasaki blasts destroyed those cities with 12 kiloton nuclear airbursts. But a Hiroshima-sized nuclear wepon at 5000 feet made no discernible crater in the ground - it was still basically flat just 1 year later - what sized meteoroid can flatten a city (or cause equal damage) but leave no trace in the geological record?

A nuclear blast causes tremendous secondary EMP damage over large areas - Does a comet/asteroid impact cause EMP from its plasma release, even


8 posted on 09/10/2009 8:28:37 AM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE

1908 Tunguska.


9 posted on 09/10/2009 9:16:58 AM PDT by null and void (We are now in day 232 of our national holiday from reality. - 0bama really isn't one of US.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE

Berringer Crater:

“The object that excavated the crater was a nickel-iron meteorite about 50 meters (54 yards) across, which impacted the plain at a speed of several kilometers per second.”

My car is a LOT smaller than 150 ft.


10 posted on 09/10/2009 9:27:27 AM PDT by null and void (We are now in day 232 of our national holiday from reality. - 0bama really isn't one of US.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: 75thOVI; aimhigh; Alice in Wonderland; AndrewC; aragorn; aristotleman; Avoiding_Sulla; BBell; ...
Thanks neverdem.
 
Catastrophism
 
· join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post new topic · subscribe ·
 

11 posted on 09/10/2009 3:27:54 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE

Speculation: the population of asteroids per unit volume is sparser inside the orbit of Mars?? (Plus, also remember that the gravity well of the big gas giants extends a lot further than the puny rocky inner planets.)


12 posted on 09/10/2009 8:32:33 PM PDT by cogitator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson