Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ACORN Pushes Return of Fairness Doctrine
HumanEvents.com ^ | 2/18/2009 | Connie Hair

Posted on 02/18/2009 7:17:42 AM PST by 2nd amendment mama

It was only last November that ACORN -- the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now -- was under FBI investigation for voter fraud in several states. Oh, wait: aren’t those investigations going on now?

Never mind. ACORN -- a favorite of our Community Organizer in Chief -- has a new agenda. Which is really part of the old agenda: getting Democrats elected.

What Democrats fear most, and what many conservatives value most highly, is talk radio. Its political punch is conservatives’ biggest weapon in the war of ideas. And, naturally, ACORN wants to kill it by restoring the old “fairness doctrine.”

You’ll find a plethora of liberals seeking to make sure that your young child has access to hard-core pornography on computers at the public library, but don’t let them listen to Rush Limbaugh or, God forbid, Sean Hannity. The freedom to speak out against those in our government who seek to limit our freedoms is among the most fundamental of safeguards, and the Obama administration and Congressional Democrats are now working in earnest to destroy it.

ACORN has a long and rather thoroughly corrupt record, involved in everything from helping tens of thousands (and maybe hundreds of thousands) of people register to vote who aren’t legally entitled to do so: illegal aliens, convicted criminals and the like. And now -- apparently planning how to spend their cut of the new Obama “stimulus” spending -- ACORN is readying a campaign to kill conservative talk radio.

The Capital Research Center, a non-partisan, non-profit group whose mission is to act as a watchdog over other non-profit groups, presented a quite extensive exposé last November of the founding, funding and activities of ACORN. This shocking report shows a well-funded group grounded in Marxist ideology and gangland-style tactics, whose self-proclaimed mission is none other than the destruction of capitalism in America. Vital to their success is the suppression of free speech.

The framework for the attempt by Democrats to silence political opposition is already in place in what the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) calls localism, a scheme set up in the form of local “community boards” that will decide whether or not your local broadcast station is meeting the standards required to review and renew their broadcast licenses every two to four years.

As you can see from the FCC localism webpage, localism regulations have already been through well over a year’s worth of procedural hearings, and, as of April 2008, “Broadcast Information Specialists are Available for Public Inquires.” The rules and regulations have been set forth in “The Public and Broadcasting,” which is the FCC field manual for the ACORN “activists” and lawyers to intimidate your local community boards into harassing your local radio stations into submission or recommend the revocation of their broadcast license. Given the reported $4.2 billion allocated for ACORN and like groups by the so-called stimulus bill signed into law by Obama yesterday, all that is left to fulfill this scenario is the confirmation of Obama’s new FCC chairman, nominee Julius Genachowski. After he’s confirmed, the full frontal assault on our First Amendment rights will begin quickly.

ACORN’s own website proudly displays their intent:

II. Make the mainstream media accessible and accountable to low- and moderate-income people.

A. Reinstate the Fairness Doctrine in broadcasting, so that grass roots community groups have equal time to express their views. B. Require cable TV companies to make good on their promises to allow community groups access to air time, or revoke their operating licenses.

Membership on the local board is a key to the ACORN’s plan: activists on state and local boards can give their national agenda support that can’t be obtained elsewhere. “Diversity” and “underserved communities” are their mantra. The plan is for the boards to control the content of stations with their ability to make licensing renewal recommendations to the FCC. We all know how intolerant the left is of any ideas other than their own -- just look how any conservative speaker is treated by the left when they speak at any college campus around the country today.

I asked House minority leader John Boehner (R-Ohio) about this open secret called “localism” yesterday. He told me, “‘Localism is quickly becoming code for the efforts of liberals to limit free speech and dissent. The American people do not believe the federal government should be in the business of dictating or restricting what’s on the public airwaves, and Republicans will fight any and every effort to stifle free speech.”

Now what we need is a ground game. This is no longer about red or blue states. ACORN, the Obama administration and Congressional Democrats are openly forcing us into a clear choice between freedom and fascism. We’ll defend our First Amendment rights and talk radio. There’s no separating one from the other.

Connie Hair is a freelance writer, a former speechwriter for Rep. Trent Franks (R-AZ) and a former media and coalitions advisor to the Senate Republican Conference.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 111th; acorn; acronbrownshirts; bho2009; censorshipdoctrine; communityorganizer; corruption; democrats; fairnessdoctrine; fcc; localism; lping; neomarxism; obama; obamabrownshirts; sorocrats; talkradio
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last

1 posted on 02/18/2009 7:17:42 AM PST by 2nd amendment mama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2nd amendment mama

What would be fair is if ACORN were placed on the list of subversive communist front groups.


2 posted on 02/18/2009 7:19:28 AM PST by IbJensen (In 2008, Americans foolishly used their freedom to vote for “chains” not “change.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2nd amendment mama

There is nothing to stop this march of control by Obozo.


3 posted on 02/18/2009 7:21:56 AM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2nd amendment mama
We all know how intolerant the left is of any ideas other than their own -- just look how any conservative speaker is treated by the left when they speak at any college campus around the country today.

Then I suppose under the Fairness Doctrine we could sue the venues (universities, etc.) for not complying with the law.

4 posted on 02/18/2009 7:22:06 AM PST by randog (Tap into America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2nd amendment mama

Why doesn’t ‘fairness’ include the conservative point of view in the newspapers?


5 posted on 02/18/2009 7:22:13 AM PST by Beowulf9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2nd amendment mama
"The plan is for the boards to control the content of stations with their ability to make licensing renewal recommendations to the FCC."

So basically exactly what they did to the banking industry to extort the commitments to bad loans to people that couldn't dream of repaying the loans. Hey! If it works, don't fix it.

6 posted on 02/18/2009 7:24:18 AM PST by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists, Call 'em what you will, they ALL have Fairies livin' in their Trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen
What would be fair is if ACORN were placed on the list of subversive communist front groups.

Subversive implies they want to overthrow the government to put in a communist one. That is so 2008. Now they are a loyalist* communist front group fighting to maintain the current government.

*Loyal to the unholy trinity of Obama, Pelosi and Reid; not to the people or the Constitution.

7 posted on 02/18/2009 7:24:43 AM PST by KarlInOhio (On 9/11 Israel mourned with us while the Palestinians danced in the streets. Who should we support?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Beowulf9
Why doesn’t ‘fairness’ include the conservative point of view in the newspapers?

I had a fella at work try to tell me that it would work both ways and liberals would have to include conservative point of views in their rags. I walked away laughing. That was fuuny.
8 posted on 02/18/2009 7:25:37 AM PST by yobid (Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it. M.Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rockinqsranch
So basically exactly what they did to the banking industry to extort the commitments to bad loans to people that couldn't dream of repaying the loans.

Exactly. And the structure is already in place at the FCC.

9 posted on 02/18/2009 7:26:05 AM PST by Clinton's a liar (We, the willing...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 2nd amendment mama

Thanks for the post, 2am!


10 posted on 02/18/2009 7:26:42 AM PST by Clinton's a liar (We, the willing...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2nd amendment mama
The framework for the attempt by Democrats to silence political opposition is already in place in what the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) calls localism, a scheme set up in the form of local “community boards” that will decide whether or not your local broadcast station is meeting the standards required to review and renew their broadcast licenses every two to four years.

This might be a hill we have to fight on. If they push localism, we need to take over those boards or at least get enough people on them to make them ineffective.

11 posted on 02/18/2009 7:26:43 AM PST by KarlInOhio (On 9/11 Israel mourned with us while the Palestinians danced in the streets. Who should we support?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio
This might be a hill we have to fight on. If they push localism, we need to take over those boards or at least get enough people on them to make them ineffective.

Karl, it's no longer an "if"--go take a look at the FCC localism link in the article. This is now a "when."

12 posted on 02/18/2009 7:30:17 AM PST by Clinton's a liar (We, the willing...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Comment #13 Removed by Moderator

To: 2nd amendment mama

We had ACORN voter fraud in Oklahoma City and probably other places since they are also in Tulsa so if we had it here, can you imagine how bad it was elsewhere?

The people heading this organization in all the states should be in prison IMHO for stealing US elections with their fraud.


14 posted on 02/18/2009 7:33:02 AM PST by PhiKapMom ( BOOMER SOONER! Sam Bradford Heisman! LetsGetThisRight.com RED STATE Oklahoma Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beowulf9

Because hardly anyone actually reads newspapers anymore. We clip coupons and read the funnies. There is also an assault on the Internet in the works.


15 posted on 02/18/2009 7:35:40 AM PST by ronnyquest ("Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not." -- Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 2nd amendment mama

Is there a public record of WHO is in ACORN? Who runs it, who contributes to it, and who works for it?


16 posted on 02/18/2009 7:37:22 AM PST by spodefly (This is my tag line. There are many like it, but this one is mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2nd amendment mama
They had their chance at talk radio. It's not our fault no one tuned in.

sw

17 posted on 02/18/2009 7:39:19 AM PST by spectre (sw )(Congress lied...the economy died)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Delacon; bamahead

Ping


18 posted on 02/18/2009 7:41:01 AM PST by EdReform (The right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed *NRA*JPFO*SAF*GOA*SAS*CCRKBA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2nd amendment mama

I hope these acorn people know that this won’t work without a REAL fight...


19 posted on 02/18/2009 7:48:50 AM PST by Edgerunner (Second Amendment Spoken Here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spectre

You know they don’t think that way.

They only failed because the system was unfair. Therefore the outcomes must be equalized so that conservatives don’t “win” all the time in this venue.


20 posted on 02/18/2009 7:51:36 AM PST by MrB (The 0bamanation: Marxism, Infanticide, Appeasement, Depression, Thuggery, and Censorship)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson