Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

John McCain Statement on Supreme Court Ruling on Second Amendment
johnmccain.com ^ | June 26, 2008 | Senator John McCain

Posted on 06/26/2008 8:24:55 AM PDT by Dems_R_Losers

ARLINGTON, VA-- U.S. Senator John McCain today issued the following statement regarding today's United States Supreme Court ruling on District of Columbia v. Heller:

"Today's decision is a landmark victory for Second Amendment freedom in the United States. For this first time in the history of our Republic, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed that the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms was and is an individual right as intended by our Founding Fathers. I applaud this decision as well as the overturning of the District of Columbia's ban on handguns and limitations on the ability to use firearms for self-defense.

Unlike Senator Obama, who refused to join me in signing a bipartisan amicus brief, I was pleased to express my support and call for the ruling issued today. Today's ruling in District of Columbia v. Heller makes clear that other municipalities like Chicago that have banned handguns have infringed on the constitutional rights of Americans. Unlike the elitist view that believes Americans cling to guns out of bitterness, today's ruling recognizes that gun ownership is a fundamental right- sacred, just as the right to free speech and assembly.

This ruling does not mark the end of our struggle against those who seek to limit the rights of law-abiding citizens. We must always remain vigilant in defense of our freedoms. But today, the Supreme Court ended forever the specious argument that the Second Amendment did not confer an individual right to keep and bear arms.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: banglist; guns; mccain; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last
To: Dems_R_Losers

Not bad at all.. It’s about time... However, you have a long way to go Johnny to get my vote. Tel;l you what if this becomes the norm instead of the exception, then you will have my vote.


21 posted on 06/26/2008 8:48:02 AM PDT by Sprite518
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

Oooh, good analysis, hadn’t thought of it that way. It seems Obama isn’t able to keep his head low enough on this though. He’s gone on record as being against gun ownership so even though it’s “off the table” it’s still an issue fresh in our minds because of this case. It might be able to have a little bit of impact for at least the current election, but in general I agree with your take.


22 posted on 06/26/2008 8:48:32 AM PDT by messierhunter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Dems_R_Losers
Heller makes clear that other municipalities like Chicago that have banned handguns have infringed on the constitutional rights of Americans.>

I wish he hadn't said that, because it's incorrect and distracts from an otherwise great smackdown.

23 posted on 06/26/2008 8:50:35 AM PDT by Sandy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frankiep
Note the dig at Chicago as well. I'm sure that at some point McCain will ask Obama, the Constitutional law professor, to explain why he has supported a Chicago law that is clearly unconstitutional!!!
24 posted on 06/26/2008 8:53:11 AM PDT by Dems_R_Losers (Obama is a Neocommunist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Dems_R_Losers
and limitations on the ability to use firearms for self-defense.

There are still unconstitutional limitations on CCL carry in many states. Specifically in NYS many jurisdictions (counties) give the issuing judges the ability to restrict the CCL to "taget and hunting" and do not allow it for general self-defense. I hope that gets settled now in NYS.

25 posted on 06/26/2008 8:53:52 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dems_R_Losers

Translation: “Let me take this wonderful opportunity to b*tch-slap my opponent...”


26 posted on 06/26/2008 8:57:11 AM PDT by hsrazorback1 (To get what you had, do what you did.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dems_R_Losers
Let's see what McCain has to say about any reenactment of the so-called "assault weapons" ban.

Let's read Miller in light of Heller.

27 posted on 06/26/2008 9:02:36 AM PDT by nonsporting
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dems_R_Losers
Good statement by McCain, especially...

Unlike the elitist view that believes Americans cling to guns out of bitterness, today's ruling recognizes that gun ownership is a fundamental right- sacred, just as the right to free speech and assembly.

28 posted on 06/26/2008 9:03:29 AM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sandy

Heller clearly opens the door for a challenge to Chicago’s ban. The Second Amendment foundation has a lawsuit challenging the Chicago ban ready to go.

Heller is a first step in a process. There will be victories and defeats for our rights, but this is a step in the right direction.

If nothing else, Heller puts second amendment issues in the forefront during this election cycle. The second amendment is no friend to Obama (and vice versa). He is an aggressive anti-gunner which will hurt him in much of the country.


29 posted on 06/26/2008 9:05:37 AM PDT by MediaMole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Dems_R_Losers

Pleasure to see that this older combat veteran still has a load of testosterone on board!


30 posted on 06/26/2008 9:08:42 AM PDT by mo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hsrazorback1

“Let me take this wonderful opportunity to b*tch-slap my opponent...”

HA!


31 posted on 06/26/2008 9:10:59 AM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: messierhunter
Good words. If he can say that kind of thing with conviction in a speech or debate he should be able to walk all over the obamination.

MacCain can (and will) say anything with conviction in a speech. That's part of his problem.

Don't be too surprised if you ever see him meeting with Jim Dobson on Sunday and at SF's gay day parade in full biker wear the following Saturday.

32 posted on 06/26/2008 9:14:02 AM PDT by E. Cartman (Just say "No" to mug-whores.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sandy
I wish he hadn't said that, because it's incorrect and distracts from an otherwise great smackdown.

I don't think it's incorrect at all. Keeping in mind the Court's current MO that the 14th Amendment incorporates enumerated rights, I think it's entirely accurate to say the decision "makes clear" such bans are unconstitutional, even if it doesn't expressly state it.

33 posted on 06/26/2008 9:14:35 AM PDT by Texas Federalist (Fred Thompson 08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: zerosix
Now if he would only "grow" on some other issues (like ANWR for instance, not to mention McCain/Feingold abomination.)

At the rate he's growing into a "Main Street" conservative, he'll have been already dead twenty years before he's acceptable to most.

34 posted on 06/26/2008 9:15:52 AM PDT by E. Cartman (Just say "No" to mug-whores.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: zerosix
Now if he would only "grow" on some other issues (like ANWR for instance, not to mention McCain/Feingold abomination.)

And, BTW, at his age he doesn't have enough time to "grow" into the job.

35 posted on 06/26/2008 9:17:05 AM PDT by E. Cartman (Just say "No" to mug-whores.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dems_R_Losers

For later.


36 posted on 06/26/2008 9:22:57 AM PDT by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dems_R_Losers
IF this is the ENTIRE statement without any overtures of conciliation to the rabid leftist liberals, then "good on him!"

However, I find it difficult to believe he would not take advantage of the opportunity to pander to his new constituency....

37 posted on 06/26/2008 9:28:36 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas Federalist

Incorporation’s an obvious future step, but it hasn’t happened yet, and McCain’s stating otherwise is just wrong (not that he actually writes his own press releases, but someone jumped the gun here).


38 posted on 06/26/2008 9:29:29 AM PDT by Sandy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Dems_R_Losers

Due to this statement, I think I might vote McCain.....depending on what he proposes to do/not do to build on this decision.....

...he ain’t the only option out there (and voting for Obama is NOT an option)....


39 posted on 06/26/2008 9:32:21 AM PDT by seeker_two
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sprite518
Better to get Half of so of what you want, than ZERO , and 100% of what you do NOT want.

Life is full of imperfect choices.

We choose, even by NOT chosing.

40 posted on 06/26/2008 9:33:24 AM PDT by drc43 (NO Drilling for prosperity!!....Nancy Pelosi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson