Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I would like to voice my opposition to the proposed East-West Corridor on 9600 N. Highland City specifically selected this road in order to effectively split the opposition to this road between three different municipalities. They claim to have had public hearings and they are ready to move forward with this road, right now. However, as a homeowner on the street in question 9600 N, I have never been notified of such until early this morning. My voice has not been heard at their council meetings, because I have not been notified. In fact, my voice carries little weight in Highland, because I am not a resident and cannot vote for these people. There was a war fought over matters such as these. Taxation without representation, pales in comparison to seizing privately owned real property without representation.

Highland's decision to use this road, was after their failure in appropriating 9850 N for this purpose. For the past 20 years, 9850 N was on Highland City's master plan as a 3 lane collector. The residents along this road, had a distinct advantage, because residents from both sides of the street were able to voice their vocal opposition. Today, I am expressing outrage that my voice is not being heard by the ultimate deciders of this ill-conceived plan. The Highland City Council, has expressly chosen a road on their border, in order to decrease the opposition of their plan, by effectively dividing the affected parties. We must not allow this plan to be implemented because of this attempted division. To address this matter ethically, the three councils, together, must meet to hear all the residents affected by this proposed roadway. Anything less will be a serious breach of government responsibility and an invitation to legal action. I ask that the American Fork City Council take action to stop this proposed roadway.

I am asking for your Freeper help, even though you don't live here because time is extremely short, and I need all the publicity and opposition that I can get.

1 posted on 08/15/2007 3:16:09 PM PDT by UnsinkableMollyBrown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
To: UnsinkableMollyBrown
Unfortunately, road-building is one of the few legitimate uses of eminent domain.

Kelo was about using eminent domain to take property on behalf of people who would generate more tax revenue for the city than the current residential owners.

That is absolutely wrong.

If they are pulling a bait-and-switch, and are actually going to give your property to a commercial developer, that's one thing. If they really are going to build a road, that is quite another.

2 posted on 08/15/2007 3:22:37 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Islam is a religion of peace, and Muslims reserve the right to kill anyone who says otherwise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: UnsinkableMollyBrown

You may be able to delay it, but it’s legit use of the law........Best you can do is hold out for mo’ money............


3 posted on 08/15/2007 3:25:23 PM PDT by Red Badger (All I know about Minnesota, I learned from Garrison Keilor..................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: UnsinkableMollyBrown

Make sure you get what they appraise the value for.


5 posted on 08/15/2007 3:26:09 PM PDT by CindyDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: UnsinkableMollyBrown

Mr Prosser said “You were quite entitled to make any suggestions or protests at the appropriate time, you know.”

“Appropriate time?” hooted Arthur. “Appropriate time? The first I knew about it was when a workman arrived at my home yesterday. I asked him if he’d come to clean the windows and he said no, he’d come to demolish the house. He didn’t tell me straight away of course. Oh no. First he wiped a couple of windows and charged me a fiver. Then he told me.”

“But Mr. Dent, the plans have been available in the local planning office for the last nine months.”

“Oh yes, well, as soon as I heard I went straight round to see them, yesterday afternoon. You hadn’t exactly gone out of your way to call attention to them, had you? I mean, like actually telling anybody or anything.”

“But the plans were on display...”

“On display? I eventually had to go down to the cellar to find them.”

“That’s the display department.”

“With a flashlight.”

“Ah, well, the lights had probably gone.”

“So had the stairs.”

“But look, you found the notice, didn’t you?”

“Yes,” said Arthur, “yes I did. It was on display on the bottom of a locked filing cabinet stuck in a disused lavatory with a sign on the door saying ‘Beware of the Leopard.’”


7 posted on 08/15/2007 3:31:53 PM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: UnsinkableMollyBrown

They have the right to purchase your home when it comes to roads.


9 posted on 08/15/2007 3:34:35 PM PDT by johnny7 ("But that one on the far left... he had crazy eyes")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: UnsinkableMollyBrown

The admin deleted the email address of these government officials that I included in my post. I appreciate that their are privacy concerns for private citizens, however, being the official in charge of governing a group of citizens would appear to nullify that right.


10 posted on 08/15/2007 3:35:22 PM PDT by UnsinkableMollyBrown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: UnsinkableMollyBrown

The matter of one municipality using eminent domain to seize property in another municipality would involve a state law issue. You need to find out what the relevant state laws are in order to determine whether you have any realistic chance of stopping this.


12 posted on 08/15/2007 3:44:53 PM PDT by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: UnsinkableMollyBrown; Issaquahking; Carry_Okie; Jeff Head; calcowgirl

Sounds like a noble, patriotic thing to do, give up your home for a needed road, doesn’t it? These corrupt municipalities have a way of doing their deeds because it benefits them personally (related to contractors, etc.) or just slip it by with no input (yeah, they probably published it, and NO one read it and they know it). The devil is always in the details and details are so darn bothersome!

What are your other neighbors affected by this saying?


13 posted on 08/15/2007 3:52:05 PM PDT by AuntB (" It takes more than walking across the border to be an American." Duncan Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: UnsinkableMollyBrown

When the road is completed will it go through to the freeway? Will any federal funds be used to construct the roadway? Does any of the proposed roadway go through parkland on which federal funds have been used? If yes, have all federal requirements for public notifications and hearings be met?

Have environmental impact assessments been made on the proposed roadway? Any endangered species? Any wetlands, streams, waterways to be crossed? If so, has proper documentation for government permits been submitted and approved?

Eminent domain is a proper function of government, but I am concerned about this construction being handled as you describe. It sounds like the governmental entities may be operating in the “it’s easier to ask forgiveness than permission” mode.


15 posted on 08/15/2007 3:55:21 PM PDT by LSAggie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: UnsinkableMollyBrown

Good luck but I suspect you can bend over and kiss your home good bye. That is what eminent domain means, to use your property for a road. We had a similar situation here a few years ago. They didn’t take our home just 25 feet off the front of our property. Instead of living on a quiet dead end road we now live on a 4 lane thoroughfare and the traffic roars by here 24 hours a day. The value of our house dropped as did our taxes but they are back up now. Such is life in the big city. Be glad they are taking your house not just ruining it and letting you keep it.


17 posted on 08/15/2007 4:03:21 PM PDT by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: UnsinkableMollyBrown

I’d suggest going to an Indian reservation and buying large numbers of artifacts, busting and scraping them up to make them look ancient, and then distributing them to your neighbors. Surreptitiously, you bury these things in a scattered fashion in the affected neighborhood and in the surrounding area. You then call the leadership of the closets Indian tribe you can find and the Bureau of Indian Affairs, and the head of Native American Studies at the nearest and largest local university. Perhaps you can create a “sacred burial ground” situation which would delay but likely not prevent what you are facing.


18 posted on 08/15/2007 4:20:24 PM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder (When Bubba lies, the finger flies!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: UnsinkableMollyBrown
“Such is life in the big city”
__________________________________

Is it now?
Well it ain’t in Alabama. We here dare defend our rights and the concept of Eminent Domain doesn’t mean that government can condemn your property for a public road or for the greater common good except by due process.

Rage against the special interest tyrants. They measure the world with their pocketbooks and they are less than fully human.

20 posted on 08/15/2007 4:46:54 PM PDT by the final gentleman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: UnsinkableMollyBrown

Since this will be a State/city debt you can request payment in gold or silver as stipulated under the U.S. Constitution:

Article 1, Section 10, Clause 1:

No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility.

Since the legal tender value of a 1 ozt silver eagle is $1, or a 1 ozt gold eagle is $20 then they have to pay the legal tender value.

Or you can take payment in debt currency that has no defined value and loses it’s purchasing power on a daily basis, your choice.


21 posted on 08/15/2007 4:50:40 PM PDT by Duke Phelan (Save the cheerleader, save the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: UnsinkableMollyBrown

Sorry to hear about this. Last year the brilliant minds in charge of the small town where I grew up decided to put sewer and water down that half mile stretch of rural route where the old homestead is located and in the process cut down and chipped up my great-grandfather’s walnut trees.

Alas, construction of the new road along a boundary is a common way to divee up expenses for a project from which more than one community will derive benefit. Get a lawyer; I wouldn’t recommend trying to get all your neighbors together to jointly hire counsel. But hey, I’m not in the legal profession.


22 posted on 08/15/2007 4:52:28 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Profile updated Tuesday, August 14, 2007. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: UnsinkableMollyBrown

I don’t know if it will help, but I sent an email to Sean Hannity. Seems to me that he likes to defend folk’s home.


41 posted on 08/15/2007 7:19:20 PM PDT by do the dhue (Don't let Jihad Jane do what Hanoi Jane did!!!! SEP 15, 07 Gathering of EAGLES DC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: UnsinkableMollyBrown
I hope you get the help you need. Eminent domain for road construction doesn't always trump property rights. There is a big curve in I25 north of Denver that attests to that. That was a long time ago and I have no idea what it cost that farmer but he fought them until they had no time left to do anything but swing the Interstate around him.

Sounds like you have even better cause what with this cabal of crooked mayors wheeling and dealing for themselves instead of their constituents. Maybe you can bring that whole thing down in the process. Collect all the info you can and when you see a lawyer ask him if that sounds like racketeering to him. RICO anyone?

42 posted on 08/15/2007 8:36:47 PM PDT by TigersEye (Regime change in the courts. Impeach activist judges!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: UnsinkableMollyBrown

Go find out just WHO owns the land where this “road” is going,,,This krap is done for personal gain most of the time
in my area,,,Follow The Money...


43 posted on 08/15/2007 8:37:13 PM PDT by 1COUNTER-MORTER-68 (THROWING ANOTHER BULLET-RIDDLED TV IN THE PILE OUT BACK~~~~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: UnsinkableMollyBrown

PS: Save anything you find on the net to your hard drive. If they get wind of growing opposition that info could become highly perishable.


44 posted on 08/15/2007 8:39:46 PM PDT by TigersEye (Regime change in the courts. Impeach activist judges!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: UnsinkableMollyBrown
Organize and contact this group: Institute for Justice. They are a libertarian public interest law firm and were involved in the Kelo v. New London case. Best of luck.
45 posted on 08/16/2007 3:34:00 AM PDT by Daffynition (The quieter you become, the more you are able to hear.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: UnsinkableMollyBrown

What kind of help can we, as outsiders, give?


51 posted on 08/16/2007 4:00:20 PM PDT by oneamericanvoice (Support freedom! Support the troops! Surrender is not an option!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson