Posted on 05/05/2007 10:37:33 AM PDT by bnelson44
“If he expect 200 or 300k killd, the US will be in Iraq for 100 yrs.”
Yeah exactly what I thought, that shows how retarded these lslamoblowbots are.
He has not been clearly “SEEN” since Tora Bora
Bingo
Although the speaker of the Palestinian legislature Ahmad Bahar just made a televised appeal to Allah to kill every Jew and American on earth, Rice insists on transferring $59 million in US taxpayer money to the Palestinian security forces!
They’ve got us surrounded again, the poor bastards.
Well then you are demonstrating you know utterly nothing about how Counter Insurgency works. We sent 500,000 men to Vietnam at the height of our involvement. How did that work out for us.
Instead of mindlessly regurgitating the Know Nothing dogmas of never been anything Democrats campaign contributors pretending to be "Conservative" Talk Radio hosts, how about you leave the war to the people who actually KNOW what they are talking about? Simply amazing how arrogantly ignorant on Iraq the Al Qeda cheerleaders around here are!
Sending 200,000 more troops, which we do NOT have in the 1st place, would be utter idiocy. It would marginalize the Iraqis security forces, delgitmize the Iraq Govt and provide the terrorists with an infinite number of soft targets to hit to the delight of the US "News Media".
The ONLY way to win a Counter Insurgency is to have one set of natives kick the other's butt. That is what is going on in Iraq right now. I suppose your are so busy ranting you have never bothered to notice the Iraq Security have taken about 5000 KIA in the last year alone? The bulk of the fighting is currently being done BY the Iraqis. YOU would turn them all against us with this "200,000 more troops" idiocy. Surest way to turn Iraq into Viet Nam redux would be to follow this dogma of "Americanization" of the war. But then like the rest of the Dincons, I suppose you simply crank up the strength of your invincible stupidity shield and tune out ALL factual reality about Iraq to cling to your emotion based hysteric dogmas.
Hot dang! That's the ticket.
Is General Petraeus familiar with the genius of MNJohnnie?
Spare us your usual hyper ignorant rantings. Sorry you had to go to Viet Nam. Iraq is not Vietnam. Get over it finally.
Democratic talking points. Now we know who writes their speeches.
Try actually learning somethings about Iraq finally.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_of_Iraq
http://icasualties.org/oif/IraqiDeaths.aspx
Too bad you didn’t go to Vietnam, or someplace, where your strategic brilliance could have been recognized for what it is.
Had we just stayed in Nam until one side kicked the other's butt, we'd have won. How could we have missed that opportunity?
Have you applied for a position at one of the War Colleges? They need some laughs too.
That’s my view, too. These so-called “warriors” for islam - zawarhiri, bin laden - are really perverted, misogynistic cowards who send other dupes out to be killed in the name of a murderous cult that seeks totalitarian power. When will Americans wake up to this fact - islam is not a religion in the sense of Christianity - it is a power-seeking cult of submission that enslaves women and kills all who do not submit. We are in an existential war, like Israel has faced since her inception, against the same cult.
New threats, soaring economy, less media attention, etc,, something is up imho.
Dear al Qaeda,
Just wait until your mommy-democrat like-thinking politicians pull America out of Iraq. Then after you mop up anyone there who you think supported democracy (and make a valuable impression on any other uppity muslims who might want to embrace tolerance)...then you can refocus on killing Americans right here in America. Great Britain sans Tony Blair will make a wonderful test ground for large scale urban operations against western civilization.
Losing in Iraq is not an option. “Iraq is situated on sectarian fault lines….Regional balance and world security is a stake.”
Pelosi and Reid are directly the cause of this last out burst by Ayman al-Zawahiri. The Democratic Speaker also announced this: "But make no mistake: Democrats are committed to ending this war. And we hope to do so in unison with the President of the United States." She did not say WINNING the war. There is a profound difference between ending and winning. Plus the unison will be with rogue nations and terrorists if Pelosi and Reid are allowed to surrender our nation as they are so desperately trying to do.
Our troops and their leaders have been hit by a political road-side bomb from the Socialist/Marxist Democrats – Pelosi, Reid, Murtha et al will have blood on their hands from this unprecedented and traitorous ill will towards their country and their military. Americans across the country should denounce the speaker and her followers and demand both Reid and Pelosi step down; they are a danger to the welfare of America let alone giving aid and comfort to the enemy. Call your Senators and your Congressmen; call or fax the ethics committee demanding these deceitful and dishonorable people be removed from their lofty positions…..they are not fit to represent America.
reminder bump.
Yep. And, too, I figure with a 20-1 kill ratio that'd be right at 4 million dead al-Qaeda. Uh...they don't have 4 million al-Qaeda.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.