Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Turn of the Screw
TCS Daily ^ | 12 December 2005 | Stephen Bainbridge

Posted on 12/12/2005 4:10:41 PM PST by NautiNurse

wine screwcap 2

A friend recently gave me a bottle of Chapoutier's 1999 La Bernardine Chateauneuf-du-Pape. I was very much looking forward to trying this wine, which had received high 80s scores from both Robert Parker and the Wine Spectator. I rarely drink Rhone wines, so I was eagerly anticipating comparing this wine to the California Rhone Rangers and Australian Shirazes with which I am more familiar. Unfortunately, this bottle was corked to the point of being undrinkable, so it went down the drain.

I like old things. Old ideas. Old books. Old wines. I guess that's part of the reason I'm a conservative. Yet, the intelligent conservative combines a disposition to preserve with an ability to reform. And so we come to the question of closures for wine.

For generations our ancestors used cork to close wine bottles, and they were wise to do so. Indeed, cork is a nearly perfect closure for wine. It is mostly impermeable, yet apparently allows just enough minute amounts of air into the bottle for the wine to evolve with age. And cork lends a certain romance to the otherwise mundane process of opening a bottle, as anyone who has popped a champagne cork knows. (For real romance, of course, port tongs can't be beat.)

Yet, sometimes change is necessary. And when it comes to wine closures, change has no greater advocate than the Wine Spectator's James Laube, who recently observed:

“… there are days when 15 percent of the wines we taste in our Napa office are flawed and undrinkable, the result of bad corks. ...

“Most wine drinkers are aware of the hassles caused by corks. Those who say they’ve never tasted a “corky,” or spoiled, wine are undoubtedly mistaken. They just didn’t know it, perhaps because they’re not sensitive to the taint. Those who haven’t lost a good, old, cellared bottle to a crumbled cork, well, that too is hard to imagine. I can only say their time is coming.”

Crumbling corks are a hassle, but one that is easily dealt with by decanting the wine through an unbleached coffee filter. Wines with bits of cork floating in them, however, are not what wine geeks mean when they talk about corked wines.

Instead, as Laube explained, a corked wine is one “tainted by 2,4,6 trichloranisole (aka TCA),” which ruins “otherwise fine wines by imparting a musty character” to the wine’s aroma and flavors.

I've come to believe that Laube is hyper-sensitive to TCA taint. His estimate that 15% of wine bottles are tainted is way too high in my experience. Yet, one does encounter enough corked wines to think experimenting with alternative closures is highly worthwhile.

So what’s the answer? I hate to say it, but I am persuaded that the answer is the Stelvin screw cap.

To be sure, a lot of high-end California wineries have switched to synthetic corks. Unfortunately, there is growing evidence that wines sealed with synthetic corks tend to oxidize after only about two years in bottle. Consider these informed remarks:

  • "We look at synthetic cork for a wine that's consumed within five years or less," says Ernie Farinias, winemaker and cellar master at the University of California, Davis. "Usually, for wines that are destined to age for more than five years, natural cork is used." (Forbes)  
  • “Wine bottled in the synthetic closures was the most oxidized after 30 months, having excessive aged character and lowest fruit.” (Hogue)
  • “We are not big believers in the long term aging potential for wines that use a synthetic cork. Many wineries that have used these synthetic closures for more than 5 years are finding that they can start to impart a synthetic taste into the wines. Certainly our own inhouse trials on a chardonnay bottling three years ago reflected that.” (Tinhorn Creek)
  • “Synthetic cork permits a faster rate of oxygen transmission into the bottle than real cork, and can age a wine too quickly. It is therefore recommended for wines that are to be consumed within 24 months.” (Supermarket Guru)
  • “Wine tends to age faster because of a loss of sulfur dioxide -- the anti-oxidant used in all wine. In this respect synthetic corks are thought to be less appropriate for wines that will be aged for several years. Early examples, including Argyl Riesling from Oregon oxidized very quickly; today the problem is less significant, but few producers would use synthetic stoppers for wines to be cellared for 5 years or more. However, most wines are drunk within days of their purchase and 2 years of the harvest, so this is not a major concern. Also, manufacturers claim that current efforts maintain freshness more effectively than the ones that have performed poorly in tests in the past.” (Corkwatch)

If I may be indulged a personal note, I'm particularly concerned about Behrens & Hitchcock, which uses solely synthetics, and in whose wines I've invested quite heavily. Their wines tend to huge, with obvious aging potential. A recent tasting of B&H’s 1998 Napa Valley Merlot was very reassuring, as the wine was developing just fine, but I still worry that their wines will go south too quickly because they've chosen a lousy closure.

Many fine California and Australia wineries are now experimenting with the Stelvin closure. In my experience, wines capped with screw tops taste just as good as those closed with corks and, of course, loads better than those closed with tainted corks. But will wines capped with screw tops age as well? According to the Spectator, Bordeaux and Burgundy wineries are starting to conclude that they can:

“Burgundy négociant Jean-Claude Boisset is releasing small amounts of several bottles from the 2003 vintage topped with screw caps, including premier cru Santenay Grand Clos Rousseau, Chambolle-Musigny and Gevrey-Chambertin Villages. ... "We feel fairly confident after the research we've done that the Stelvin will work nicely," said Jean-Charles Boisset, the founder's son. Boisset said the decision to test the Stelvin was sparked by a tasting of a 1966 Mercurey that was closed by screw cap....”

So the next time you see a $20 bottle of wine topped by a screw cap, don't assume you're being ripped off. As Laube opined:

“I’ve long advocated twist-offs, and when I’m shopping I’ve found myself gravitating toward them. One reason is that I’m assured the wine won’t be corked. Another is that I want to taste how fresh the wine is. I also want to support those who are taking an important leadership role for the industry and consumers.”



TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: wine
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last
To: Tunehead54
Done!

p.s. Mad Dog and Opus lovers share this same ping list.

21 posted on 12/12/2005 5:58:56 PM PST by NautiNurse (The greatest crime since World War II has been U.S. foreign policy - Ramsey Clark)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: NautiNurse
I tend to agree with Hogue, the syncorks suck.

In my cellar, I find wastage between 8-10% due to corks.
I mostly use an antique Estate Opener with a modern screw in it, but have all the tools for fishing out broke, dry, or powdered corks, but usually, it's a waste of time.

I'll miss the uncorking ritual, but mostly, I'll miss using the lead foil, cut in strips, to weigh Salmon flies. I've been decanting wines at home meals for several years, so a screw cap doesn't matter to me. Pouring a great DRC down the drain does.

22 posted on 12/12/2005 6:08:45 PM PST by FreedomFarmer (Facts without theory is trivia. Theory without facts is socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NautiNurse

Yeah, there have been a few times when I've had to resort to an adjustable wrench to open the bottle. But like you, I've got a little invested in some corkscrews now. Plus, I just like the routine of pulling out the cork. Otherwise, I feel like I'm dealing with a bottle of Annie Green Springs.


23 posted on 12/12/2005 6:09:08 PM PST by speedy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Tunehead54

'pliers'


24 posted on 12/12/2005 6:32:32 PM PST by perfect stranger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

Wine snobs will have a hard time eschewing corks, but they'd better get used to screw tops. They're cheaper, and, as the article says, preferable.
____________________________________________________
No matter how much sense it makes to switch to a screw top you will still have those who are too hung up on image and "nuance."



25 posted on 12/12/2005 6:40:43 PM PST by Grizzled Bear ("Does not play well with others.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Nick Danger

I have a hard enough time eschewing
______________________________________________________
Gesundheit!


26 posted on 12/12/2005 6:41:43 PM PST by Grizzled Bear ("Does not play well with others.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: perfect stranger
Dang! A wino english teacher! Hey since you're in Florida give me a call and I'll buy you a glass - your choice - within reason!
;-)
27 posted on 12/12/2005 6:54:34 PM PST by Tunehead54 (Nothing funny here ;-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Tunehead54
A Freeper had a comment yesterday, something like, "Wino? Wine-yes!".
28 posted on 12/12/2005 7:06:31 PM PST by perfect stranger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: NautiNurse

I'm with the author. Corked wine is a financial and emotional setback. Most people don't want to drive a car with 1920's technology.

The Aussies are at the forefront of the new corks. And they make great wine.


29 posted on 12/12/2005 8:32:19 PM PST by dervish (no excuses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dervish

"Corked wine is a financial and emotional setback."

Well said, it's a shame to pour some once great wine down the drain, especially after getting yourself all primed for it.


30 posted on 12/13/2005 4:07:40 AM PST by caver (Yes, I did crawl out of a hole in the ground.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: NautiNurse

A good read. The question I have is why the negativity about synthetic corks and no mention of the plastic in boxed wines or that screw caps are lined with synthetic material also.

A number of WS Top 100 wines last year had screw tops including domestic pinot noir, like Argyle mentioned above.


31 posted on 12/13/2005 5:17:09 AM PST by quantim (Detroit is the New Orleans of the north, settled by the French and ruined by liberals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NautiNurse
"vintage topped with screw caps, including premier cru Santenay Grand Clos Rousseau, Chambolle-Musigny and Gevrey-Chambertin Villages"

I don't remember the place or the girl, but the wine, it was a Chambertin!

32 posted on 12/13/2005 6:09:53 AM PST by Uncle Miltie (Surrender! - Vote Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Just a few comments, not directed at anyone in particular.

Natural corks have 2 problems:

Corking (TCA) is a from the sterilization process of the cork prior to bottling. Has very little to do with aging. A few months (in the supply chain) and it can ruin a wine. The only reason aging matters is that a ruined 1986 you've been babying for 15 years hurts a lot more to lose than the Beaujolais Nouveau you picked up yesterday.

A crumbled cork isn't "corking" but it can ruin a wine. As the article states, if it crumbles on removal the pieces can be fished or filtereed out without damaging the wine. But if it fails as a seal before its time, the wine will be ruined.

One of the issues with natural cork is its availability...the wine industry outside of Europe has boomed. 30 years ago, California produced much much less, the Aussies barely existed never mind the Chileans etc. The number of bottles corked each year has exploded. Note none of these areas are known for planting cork oak trees...most of it still comes from Portugal and parts of Spain. It takes about 10 years between harvests, and more than that before the first. Natural cork production has not come close to keeping up with the international growth of the wine industry. This leads to using smaller corks (1.5 inches vs 2.75 inches) and a general degradation of quality of the cork from more frequent than ideal harvests. I don't expect the percentage of TCA corked wines to increase, but I would bet that more and more naturally corked bottles will fail and crumble.

Quite simply, some type of alternative closure is a must...not for all wines, but at least for some. If more wine is sold in boxes (or more specifically, plastic bags inside boxes) and more wine is Stelvin (aka screw capped) than that would alleviate a lot of the pressure on natural cork. But something has to give. My own experiences with synthetic corks have been good; I've never had the breathing problems mentioned in the article, but I missed the whole first generation of synthetic corks. As with anything, expect the technology to improve. I expect that plastic bags, screw caps and synthetic corks all to grow as the sealing device for wines. In fact, I'd be willing to bet that in not too long, you'll commonly see single serving wines in something approaching a 16 oz soda bottle. And while Opus One won't ever be sold that way...it is a good thing that you'll be able to get a decent everyday wine for cheap.


33 posted on 12/14/2005 4:07:22 AM PST by blanknoone (When will Europe understand there is no one willing to accept their surrender?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blanknoone

Bella Sera already sells a four-pack of individual bottles of their Merlot. I saw it at the grocery store yesterday...and they have screw caps.


34 posted on 12/14/2005 4:15:47 AM PST by Miss Marple (Lord, please look after Mozart Lover's son and keep him strong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: NautiNurse
The wine industry is screwing around with corks...

Boones Farm has had screw tops for as long as I could remember...Ah the memories. :p

35 posted on 12/14/2005 4:22:16 AM PST by BureaucratusMaximus (The 2005 Chicago White Sox---World Series Champs---WOO! HOO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NautiNurse

Ah, Reunite'


36 posted on 12/14/2005 4:27:43 AM PST by wolfcreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NautiNurse
Other fine wines have been using screw tops for years....


37 posted on 12/14/2005 4:32:49 AM PST by Cincinatus (Omnia relinquit servare Republicam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus
A man after my own way of life...

There is hope for this world! ;)

38 posted on 12/14/2005 6:38:04 AM PST by BureaucratusMaximus (The 2005 Chicago White Sox---World Series Champs---WOO! HOO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: NautiNurse
p.s. Mad Dog and Opus lovers share this same ping list.

OMG...there's a pinglist for everything!

Add me please...while I lean towards Boones Farm...Mad Dog has a special place in my heart.

39 posted on 12/14/2005 6:39:52 AM PST by BureaucratusMaximus (The 2005 Chicago White Sox---World Series Champs---WOO! HOO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: NautiNurse
Geez, what's next... wine in a box??

Oh, wait...
40 posted on 12/14/2005 6:45:06 AM PST by LIConFem (A fronte praecipitium, a tergo lupi.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson