Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Turn of the Screw
TCS Daily ^ | 12 December 2005 | Stephen Bainbridge

Posted on 12/12/2005 4:10:41 PM PST by NautiNurse

wine screwcap 2

A friend recently gave me a bottle of Chapoutier's 1999 La Bernardine Chateauneuf-du-Pape. I was very much looking forward to trying this wine, which had received high 80s scores from both Robert Parker and the Wine Spectator. I rarely drink Rhone wines, so I was eagerly anticipating comparing this wine to the California Rhone Rangers and Australian Shirazes with which I am more familiar. Unfortunately, this bottle was corked to the point of being undrinkable, so it went down the drain.

I like old things. Old ideas. Old books. Old wines. I guess that's part of the reason I'm a conservative. Yet, the intelligent conservative combines a disposition to preserve with an ability to reform. And so we come to the question of closures for wine.

For generations our ancestors used cork to close wine bottles, and they were wise to do so. Indeed, cork is a nearly perfect closure for wine. It is mostly impermeable, yet apparently allows just enough minute amounts of air into the bottle for the wine to evolve with age. And cork lends a certain romance to the otherwise mundane process of opening a bottle, as anyone who has popped a champagne cork knows. (For real romance, of course, port tongs can't be beat.)

Yet, sometimes change is necessary. And when it comes to wine closures, change has no greater advocate than the Wine Spectator's James Laube, who recently observed:

“… there are days when 15 percent of the wines we taste in our Napa office are flawed and undrinkable, the result of bad corks. ...

“Most wine drinkers are aware of the hassles caused by corks. Those who say they’ve never tasted a “corky,” or spoiled, wine are undoubtedly mistaken. They just didn’t know it, perhaps because they’re not sensitive to the taint. Those who haven’t lost a good, old, cellared bottle to a crumbled cork, well, that too is hard to imagine. I can only say their time is coming.”

Crumbling corks are a hassle, but one that is easily dealt with by decanting the wine through an unbleached coffee filter. Wines with bits of cork floating in them, however, are not what wine geeks mean when they talk about corked wines.

Instead, as Laube explained, a corked wine is one “tainted by 2,4,6 trichloranisole (aka TCA),” which ruins “otherwise fine wines by imparting a musty character” to the wine’s aroma and flavors.

I've come to believe that Laube is hyper-sensitive to TCA taint. His estimate that 15% of wine bottles are tainted is way too high in my experience. Yet, one does encounter enough corked wines to think experimenting with alternative closures is highly worthwhile.

So what’s the answer? I hate to say it, but I am persuaded that the answer is the Stelvin screw cap.

To be sure, a lot of high-end California wineries have switched to synthetic corks. Unfortunately, there is growing evidence that wines sealed with synthetic corks tend to oxidize after only about two years in bottle. Consider these informed remarks:

  • "We look at synthetic cork for a wine that's consumed within five years or less," says Ernie Farinias, winemaker and cellar master at the University of California, Davis. "Usually, for wines that are destined to age for more than five years, natural cork is used." (Forbes)  
  • “Wine bottled in the synthetic closures was the most oxidized after 30 months, having excessive aged character and lowest fruit.” (Hogue)
  • “We are not big believers in the long term aging potential for wines that use a synthetic cork. Many wineries that have used these synthetic closures for more than 5 years are finding that they can start to impart a synthetic taste into the wines. Certainly our own inhouse trials on a chardonnay bottling three years ago reflected that.” (Tinhorn Creek)
  • “Synthetic cork permits a faster rate of oxygen transmission into the bottle than real cork, and can age a wine too quickly. It is therefore recommended for wines that are to be consumed within 24 months.” (Supermarket Guru)
  • “Wine tends to age faster because of a loss of sulfur dioxide -- the anti-oxidant used in all wine. In this respect synthetic corks are thought to be less appropriate for wines that will be aged for several years. Early examples, including Argyl Riesling from Oregon oxidized very quickly; today the problem is less significant, but few producers would use synthetic stoppers for wines to be cellared for 5 years or more. However, most wines are drunk within days of their purchase and 2 years of the harvest, so this is not a major concern. Also, manufacturers claim that current efforts maintain freshness more effectively than the ones that have performed poorly in tests in the past.” (Corkwatch)

If I may be indulged a personal note, I'm particularly concerned about Behrens & Hitchcock, which uses solely synthetics, and in whose wines I've invested quite heavily. Their wines tend to huge, with obvious aging potential. A recent tasting of B&H’s 1998 Napa Valley Merlot was very reassuring, as the wine was developing just fine, but I still worry that their wines will go south too quickly because they've chosen a lousy closure.

Many fine California and Australia wineries are now experimenting with the Stelvin closure. In my experience, wines capped with screw tops taste just as good as those closed with corks and, of course, loads better than those closed with tainted corks. But will wines capped with screw tops age as well? According to the Spectator, Bordeaux and Burgundy wineries are starting to conclude that they can:

“Burgundy négociant Jean-Claude Boisset is releasing small amounts of several bottles from the 2003 vintage topped with screw caps, including premier cru Santenay Grand Clos Rousseau, Chambolle-Musigny and Gevrey-Chambertin Villages. ... "We feel fairly confident after the research we've done that the Stelvin will work nicely," said Jean-Charles Boisset, the founder's son. Boisset said the decision to test the Stelvin was sparked by a tasting of a 1966 Mercurey that was closed by screw cap....”

So the next time you see a $20 bottle of wine topped by a screw cap, don't assume you're being ripped off. As Laube opined:

“I’ve long advocated twist-offs, and when I’m shopping I’ve found myself gravitating toward them. One reason is that I’m assured the wine won’t be corked. Another is that I want to taste how fresh the wine is. I also want to support those who are taking an important leadership role for the industry and consumers.”



TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: wine
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last
The wine industry is screwing around with corks...
1 posted on 12/12/2005 4:10:42 PM PST by NautiNurse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: andrew2527; AnAmericanMother; A Jovial Cad; Awgie; babaloo; Betis70; Bigturbowski; blanknoone; ...
Click to be added or removed. (Over ninety members).

Wine news ping.

2 posted on 12/12/2005 4:11:27 PM PST by NautiNurse (The greatest crime since World War II has been U.S. foreign policy - Ramsey Clark)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NautiNurse
La Bernardine Chateauneuf-du-Pape

pronounced Chateau-newf-du-pop. One of the best table wines for the money I have had.

3 posted on 12/12/2005 4:25:06 PM PST by groanup (Shred for Ian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NautiNurse

Wine snobs will have a hard time eschewing corks, but they'd better get used to screw tops. They're cheaper, and, as the article says, preferable.


4 posted on 12/12/2005 4:34:35 PM PST by sinkspur (Trust, but vilify.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
They're cheaper, and, as the article says, preferable.

I know some women who say the same thing about electric vibrators.

5 posted on 12/12/2005 4:46:35 PM PST by Mr Ramsbotham (Laws against sodomy are honored in the breech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

I have a hard enough time eschewing beef jerky. Are corks worse?


6 posted on 12/12/2005 4:46:39 PM PST by Nick Danger (www.vvlf.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NautiNurse

Boxed wines are also preserved from air contact after opening because the plastic bladder doesn'r require internal air to pour. I've had some great Aussi wines in boxed containers.


7 posted on 12/12/2005 4:57:15 PM PST by The Great RJ ("Mir wölle bleiwen wat mir sin" or "We want to remain what we are." ..Luxembourg motto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NautiNurse

I don't think it will get too far. the sentimental attachment to real cork also keeps most from using the rubber corks too.

The price of wine includes the vintners/sellers fudge factor to cover spoilage.

Then again, I'm mainly a beer drinker! ;o)


8 posted on 12/12/2005 5:01:05 PM PST by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NautiNurse

I like the corkscrew ritual. Corky wines are not one of life's major problems. I vote for keeping the cork.


9 posted on 12/12/2005 5:09:38 PM PST by speedy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NautiNurse

For some reason I keep thinking of Redd Foxx and his "cham-pipple" Anyone else as old as I?

I have several wine snob friends who will definitely eschew the screw caps because..........well, they are wine snobs.

I've had some quite nice boxed wines from Australia. Not all things modern are bad things.


10 posted on 12/12/2005 5:17:17 PM PST by Rushmore Rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: The Great RJ

Oops, should have read further. I like Australian box wines.


11 posted on 12/12/2005 5:18:33 PM PST by Rushmore Rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

The loss rate from cork approaches 15% for some closures. How can any industry withstand that rate of waste?


12 posted on 12/12/2005 5:25:25 PM PST by johniegrad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: pissant; speedy

I am a waffler about the cork situation. I voted for the screw cap the last time I used my manicure kit to open a wine bottle. On the other hand, I am heavily invested into an over-the-top estate corkscrew purchased barely two years ago.


13 posted on 12/12/2005 5:35:12 PM PST by NautiNurse (The greatest crime since World War II has been U.S. foreign policy - Ramsey Clark)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: NautiNurse
I've heard of big-time wine connoisseurs buying cases of classic vintages only to find the corks dried out allowing the wine to turn to vinegar.
14 posted on 12/12/2005 5:35:39 PM PST by manwiththehands ("Have a RamaHanuKwanzMas" - Glenn Beck (And Merry Christmas!) (... and "Happy Holidays!"))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NautiNurse

bttt


15 posted on 12/12/2005 5:35:58 PM PST by johniegrad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: manwiththehands

I was extremely lucky. I stumbled onto 6 bottles of Bertani amarone vintage 1986 at an out of town discount house and bought all six. They must have been stored properly because I didn't have a bad cork in the lot. This is unusual. At $160/bottle I got lucky.


16 posted on 12/12/2005 5:39:10 PM PST by johniegrad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: NautiNurse
Corkscrew? When was that invented. I've been knocking the neck off against the edge of the bar.
17 posted on 12/12/2005 5:41:13 PM PST by OSHA (murtha - n. A state of low morale after being betrayed by a person in a position of trust.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: NautiNurse
Synthetic corks suck. If they're not sealing well enough to cause "corkage issues" after just a few years then they really suck. Nowadays you need your corkscrew and a pair of pliars to get the "cork" off the corkscrew and all for no benefit except reduced cost to the vintner.

Somehow this changeover was related to dropping the lead seals on the bottles. I'd rather take my chances with the lead ... ;-(



18 posted on 12/12/2005 5:47:45 PM PST by Tunehead54 (Nothing funny here ;-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tunehead54

Oops! Thought I was still reviewing the post - can you spot the typo? ;-)


19 posted on 12/12/2005 5:49:24 PM PST by Tunehead54 (Nothing funny here ;-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: NautiNurse
Could you add me to the list please? Is there, like, a sublist for connoisseur's of MD 40-40?
;-)
20 posted on 12/12/2005 5:53:25 PM PST by Tunehead54 (Nothing funny here ;-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson