Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How the Early Universe Got Dusty Remains a Mystery
University of Arizona ^ | 02 December 2004 | Lori Stiles

Posted on 12/08/2004 6:54:09 AM PST by PatrickHenry

Astronomers who think they know how the very early universe came to have so much interstellar dust need to think again, according to new results from the Spitzer Space Telescope.

In the last few years, observers have discovered huge quantities of interstellar dust near the most distant quasars in the very young universe, only 700 million years after the cosmos was born in the Big Bang.

"And that becomes a big question," said Oliver Krause of the University of Arizona Steward Observatory in Tucson and the Max Planck Institute for Astronomy in Heidelberg. "How could all of this dust have formed so quickly?"

Astronomers know two processes that form the dust, Krause said. One, old sun-like stars near death generate dust. Two, infrared space missions have revealed the dust is produced in supernovae explosions.

"The first process takes several billion years," Krause noted. "Supernovae explosions, by contrast, produce dust in much less time, only about 10 million years."

So when astronomers reported detecting submillimeter emission from massive amounts of cold interstellar dust in the supernova remnant Cassiopeia A last year, some considered the mystery solved. Type II supernovae like 'Cas A' likely produced the interstellar dust in the very early universe, they concluded. (Type II supernovae come from massive stars that blow apart in huge explosions after their cores collapse.)

Krause and colleagues from UA's Steward Observatory and the Max Planck institute in Heidelberg have now discovered that the detected submillimeter emission comes not from the Cas A remnant itself but from the molecular cloud complex known to exist along the line of sight between Earth and Cas A. They report the work in the Dec. 2 issue of Nature.

Cas A is the youngest known supernova remnant in our Milky Way. It is about 11,000 light years away, behind the Perseus spiral arm clouds that are roughly 9,800 light years away. Krause suspects that the Perseus clouds explain why late 17th century astronomers didn't report observing the brilliant Cas A outburst around A.D. 1680. Cas A is so close to Earth that the supernova should have been the brightest stellar object in the sky, but dust in the Perseus clouds eclipsed the view.

The Arizona and German team mapped Cas A at 160-micron wavelengths using the ultra-heat-sensitive Multiband Imaging Photometer (MIPS) aboard the Spitzer Space Telescope. These long wavelengths are the most sensitive to cold interstellar dust emission. They then compared the results with maps of interstellar gas previously made with radio telescopes. They found that the dust in these interstellar clouds account for virtually all the emission at 160 microns from the direction of Cas A.

Minus the emission from this dust, there is no evidence for large amounts of cold dust in Cas A, the team concludes.

"Astronomers will have to go on searching for the source of the dust in the early universe," UA Steward Observatory astronomer and Regents' Professor George Rieke said. Rieke is principal investigator for the Spitzer Space Telescope's MIPS instrument and a co-author of the Nature paper.

"Solving this riddle will show astronomers where and how the first stars formed, or perhaps indicate there is some non-stellar process that can produce large amounts of dust," Rieke said. "Either way, (finding the source of the dust) will reveal what went on at the formative stage for stars and galaxies, an epoch that is nearly unobserved in any other way."

Authors of the Nature article, "No cold dust within the supernova remnant Cassiopeia A," are Oliver Krause, Stephan M. Birkmann, George H. Rieke, Dietrich Lemke, Ulrich Klaas, Dean C. Hines and Karl D. Gordon.

Birkmann, Lemke and Klaas are with the Max Planck Institute for Astronomy in Heidelberg. Krause, Rieke, and Gordon are with the University of Arizona Steward Observatory. Hines is with the Space Science Institute in Boulder, Colo.

The Spitzer Space Telescope is managed for NASA by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, Calif.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: astronomy; cosmology; haltonarp; physics; science; spitzer; spitzertelescope; steadystate; universe
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last
Bold and underline added by me.
1 posted on 12/08/2004 6:54:09 AM PST by PatrickHenry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry; VadeRetro; jennyp; Junior; longshadow; RadioAstronomer; Physicist; LogicWings; ...
Science Ping! This is an elite subset of the Evolution ping list.
See the list's description in my freeper homepage. Then FReepmail me to be added or dropped.

2 posted on 12/08/2004 6:55:24 AM PST by PatrickHenry (The List-O-Links for evolution threads is at my freeper homepage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

Dusty?? Is there an odor?? A bad, bad odor?? May I suggest a Michael Moore fart??


3 posted on 12/08/2004 6:56:56 AM PST by Doc Savage (...because they stand on a wall, and they say nothing is going to hurt you tonight, not on my watch!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

Now I know why I can't stop sneezing. Damn.


4 posted on 12/08/2004 6:58:54 AM PST by Shryke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

I wonder how many kook theories this will revive.


5 posted on 12/08/2004 7:00:37 AM PST by Moonman62 (Federal Creed: If it moves tax it. If it keeps moving regulate it. If it stops moving subsidize it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

Just stick around ...


6 posted on 12/08/2004 7:02:05 AM PST by PatrickHenry (The List-O-Links for evolution threads is at my freeper homepage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

"How could all of this dust have formed so quickly?"

Sounds like my wife's question


7 posted on 12/08/2004 7:03:47 AM PST by Panzerlied ("We shall never surrender!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
The way gold nuggets get produced may be applicable.

Envision an archaeobacteria so tough it can repair radiation damage to it's genetic code. Then envision it out there sucking in molecules from intersteller gas, extracting the energy (from the charge differentials), and excreting discharged metallic ions.

Next thing you know you have lots and lots of dust.

Then the dust coalesces, gravity heats it up, planets are formed, etc., and the archaeobacteria move in for another round of meals.

8 posted on 12/08/2004 7:06:34 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
"In the last few years, observers have discovered huge quantities of interstellar dust near the most distant quasars in the very young universe, only 700 million years after the cosmos was born in the Big Bang."

Bold should be: ...we believe only 700 million years after the cosmos was potentially born in what we believe (and many do not) was something we call the Big Bang.

Astronomers know two processes that form the dust, Krause said. One, old sun-like stars near death generate dust. Two, infrared space missions have revealed the dust is produced in supernovae explosions.

Bold should be: Astronomers used to believe there were two processes that form dust, but now we realize we were wrong, which seems to be happening on more of a regular basis.

"The first process takes several billion years," Krause noted. "Supernovae explosions, by contrast, produce dust in much less time, only about 10 million years."

Bold should be: The first process we thought took several billion years, but now we realize, that our juiced up numbers to pull the line for the Theory of Evolution, we miscalculated.

More insightful commentary to come!

9 posted on 12/08/2004 7:09:56 AM PST by bondserv (Alignment is critical! † [Check out my profile page])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

A good portion of it comes from the dirt road in front of my house.


10 posted on 12/08/2004 7:10:03 AM PST by OSHA (Do you hear what I hear?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
There was dust in the early universe because there was not yet any Lemon Scented PledgeTM.
11 posted on 12/08/2004 7:11:30 AM PST by VadeRetro (Nothing means anything when you go to Hell for knowing what things mean.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: OSHA

Is that what it is? I was wondering the same thing. Just yesterday, I dusted this whole place, and today I see more damned dust on things. I never bring shovels full of dirt into the house, so where does it come from? The stars! I should have known.

12 posted on 12/08/2004 7:14:10 AM PST by Nick Danger (Want some wood? How about some nice cars? Aircraft? Medicines? Whatcha want?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

No mystery, the cleaning lady went on vacation.


13 posted on 12/08/2004 7:15:57 AM PST by Humvee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
There was dust in the early universe because there was not yet any Lemon Scented Pledgetm

I guess the Intelligent Designer forgot to change the filters before he flipped the switch and started the Big Bang.

14 posted on 12/08/2004 7:28:49 AM PST by PatrickHenry (The List-O-Links for evolution threads is at my freeper homepage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

Thanks for the ping!


15 posted on 12/08/2004 8:30:05 AM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
because there was not yet any Lemon Scented PledgeTM.

Allow me:

Lemon Scented Pledge™

the threademark sign is: [ALT+0153] (without the "plus sign")

16 posted on 12/08/2004 10:06:12 AM PST by longshadow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: longshadow
the threademark sign

er, make that "trademark"....

17 posted on 12/08/2004 10:07:34 AM PST by longshadow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Nick Danger

In my house, we know the cause; we just can't bring ourselves to kill three dogs and a neighbor who was raised in a barn.


18 posted on 12/08/2004 10:20:43 AM PST by Old Professer (The accidental trumps the purposeful in every endeavor attended by the incompetent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: longshadow
the threademark sign is: [ALT+0153] (without the "plus sign")

Like I'm really going to remember that. I'm hoarding the few brain cells I have left.

19 posted on 12/08/2004 11:49:52 AM PST by VadeRetro (Nothing means anything when you go to Hell for knowing what things mean.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

20 posted on 12/08/2004 11:51:57 AM PST by evets (God bless president George W. Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson