Posted on 03/08/2004 1:33:06 PM PST by Mr. Silverback
One subject I enjoy reading about is the intelligent design movement and its arguments against natural origins. And believe me, there's a lot to read. Recent years have seen an explosion of books, articles, and websites on the subject of intelligent design. Scientists, philosophers, and theologians have all contributed valuable insights to the debate.
But I think I can safely say that, with all of this reading, I've never read a book by an eminent scientist and intelligent design advocate that ended with a presentation of the Gospel -- never, that is, until now.
Henry F. Schaefer's book SCIENCE AND CHRISTIANITY: CONFLICT OR COHERENCE? does exactly that. As his book's title indicates, Schaefer, a five-time nominee for the Nobel Prize, has spent a lot of time studying and teaching about the relationship between science and faith. So his writing is clear and compelling not just on intelligent design, but also on a whole range of other issues that are of interest to both people of faith and people of science. But I think his treatment of the intelligent design issue is one of the best parts of the book, because it shows Schaefer meeting nonbelieving scientists on their own ground and using their own observations to undermine their arguments.
Schaefer quotes the brilliant scientist and agnostic Stephen Hawking, who wrote that a good theory "must accurately describe a large class of observations" and "must make definite predictions about the results of future observations." While acknowledging the strengths of the "standard evolutionary model" in the first area, Schaefer points out that it has serious weaknesses in the second area. He writes, "Over the past 150 years evolutionary theorists have made countless predictions about fossil specimens to be observed in the future. Unfortunately for these seers, many new fossils have been discovered, but the interesting ones almost always seem to be contrary to the 'best' predictions." Schaefer then contrasts the theory of evolution with other theories, such as the atomic theory and the theory of gravity, which are able to make precise predictions of future events, such as when Halley's Comet would appear -- predictions, Schaefer says, that turned out to be true in his lifetime.
So, contrary to what many believe, the theory of intelligent design isn't just something people believe because the Bible tells them so. It's something we believe because it makes sense and describes the real world far better than the alternative theory.
As passages like this demonstrate, Schaefer's book is a wonderful resource for the high school or college student interested in studying science. In fact, it's ideal for parents to go through with their high school or college-age kids. Schaefer's own story of coming to faith in Christ, his descriptions of many other prominent scientists who are Christians, and his desire to share his faith will be an encouragement to kids who are wondering if their love of science is compatible with their commitment to God. And his exploration of issues like intelligent design will not only demonstrate to them how God has manifested Himself through nature, but also provide them with an excellent example of how their own gifts can be used for God's glory.
Now hear this, now hear this: All server elves prepare to recieve crevo thread, repeat, prepare to receive crevo thread. That is all.
If anyone wants on or off my BreakPoint Ping List, please notify me here or by freepmail.
The Vatican finds him a good enough Catholic to invite him to conferences of Roman Catholic Scientists.
Does Schaefer know something the Pope doesn't, or is this the edge of one of those fundamentalist protestant 'Catholics are not really Christians' viewpoints?
So9
Those who haven't figured it out by now never will....
Perhaps someday Mr Colson will be so kind as to post some predictions made by Intelligent Design. Perhaps someday Mr Colson will post any prediction made by Intelligent Design. Perhaps Mr colson will explain how properties of the designer are reflected in the design. Lastly perhaps Mr Colson will explain how Intelligent Design explains shared errors.
Yes. There is also an "explosion" of books, articles, etc. on subjects such as crop circles, pyramid power, ancient astronauts, psychic phenomena, spoon-bending, UFO abductions, astrology, and many other worthy "science" topics. But not in serious scientific literature.
I don't think so. Causality breaks down at the quantum level. Hawking is clear on his agreement with this in his books. If he is agnostic, it may be a simple extension of physics into theology. Some things are inherently unknowable.
So9
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.