Trump's Saturday delegate disaster (South Carolina and Colorado)

The Politico ^ | April 9, 2016 | Eli Stokols and Kyle Cheney

[MIA_eccl1212]

Well it could also be from here
I think, there may even be a recording on youtube or someo other location like that... it was 2012 and Ted was arguing about Obama's eligibility.

[Freedom56v2]

Thanks so much for putting so much thought into such a cogent commentary :)

[dp0622]

interesting take.

[fortheDeclaration]

These people are evil!

[fortheDeclaration]

No, he just gets their votes.

[Conservative Gato]

And there are many examples of what you speak of on this thread. It’s pretty sad to witness because this is not a game, it’s about the future of this country, a Constitutional Republic verses the constant progressing statism that the Uniparty and Global establishment continues to strangle us with. And yes, Ted Cruz has made himself a part of the establishment by many of his actions.

They are going to have to open their eyes eventually. Hopefully it is not too late where we will have to tell our children and grandchildren what freedom was like (credit: Reagan Warning).

CGato

[Elyse]

I have been searching for reference to it and the only place I find it is on that website. That is why I wouldn’t believe it or cite it as truth.

[kiryandil]

Thanks for pulling the n00b card.

I dislike having to explain myself to people who aren't up to speed.

No one’s influence could have changed that outcome.

Walker had just won a recall election by stomping his opponents.

You'd have us believe that he couldn't share the love with Romney?

It was more like the Democrats bused in vote soldiers from Illinois to the Milwaukee precincts, because Illinois was a LOCK.

And Walker knew, but was too much of a candy@ss to challenge it.

Waukesha County, Wisconsin:

2016
   Cruz      75123
   Trump     27186	
   Kasich    18521	
     total: 120830

   Sanders   26339
   Clinton   24784
     total:  51123

2016 total: 171953

2012
   Romney    51329
   Santorum  23874
   other      7489
      total: 82692

   Obama      9442
      total:  9442

2012 total:  92134

2008
   McCain    28160
   Huckabee  13926
   other      1313
      total: 43399

   Obama     37662
   Clinton   34009
      total: 71671

2008 total: 115070

Fascinating numbers, n00b. Don't you agree?

Where did the 20,000 2008 Democrat primary voters "disappear" to, in an open primary? Hey - lookee there! Cruz got 20,000 more votes in 2016 than Romney in the 2012 primary!

[avenir]

“They are no better than liberals.”

I don’t know about that, but they don’t SOUND much different, in essence shouting “Rule of law! Rule of law! Rule of law!” on every delegate thread.

[Chgogal]

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/10/us/politics/primary-process-is-seen-as-in-conflict-with-democracy.html?_r=0

[MIA_eccl1212]

well then we will just see.
I believe it now.
I believe it is an established fact. You clearly don’t.

But I believe you will. One day.

If I find another confirming source I will send it to you, especially if I can find the audio... with Ted’s voice in it.

[Chgogal]

You will find this article interesting:
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/10/us/politics/primary-process-is-seen-as-in-conflict-with-democracy.html?_r=0

[Conservative Gato]

Interesting thoughts. Mitt Romney was a disaster. An absolute train wreck of a Presidential candidate. That is why he was absolutely destroyed in Wisconsin as well as most other states.

And Mitt Romney was the establishment candidate. He pretty much took a dive so that 0bama could win his second term.

It's crazy that you see that but don't see all the shenanigans going on with the GOP establishment trying to get "their" candidate installed and the current leader ousted.

They will fight tooth and nail to keep a true outsider, Donald Trump, from being the nominee but I guarantee you they will lay down against Hillary Clinton if they get "their" candidate installed.

Donald Trump won't lay down for anyone and that has got to have the whole Uniparty/Globalist establishment in a frenzy.

CGato

[Forty-Niner]

“Constitutionalism is not a surrender to the mob, it is a set of rules to be observed.”

So why is the “Constitutionally Conservative” Canadian born son of a Cuban Father certifying to the various SoSs that he is a Constitutionally eligible NBC candidate for the office of US President if it’s all about “.....a set of rules to be observed.”?

Ted started his candidacy with a lie (perjury?) and hasn’t seem fit to stop since. How is he any different from the crooked, lying politicians we have now? As far as I am concerned all he needs is a Pantsuit!

It pains me to say, but for the first time in my life I have to say “never again....I’ll sit out first!” (no idle threat) The first time since I voted for Reagan as California Governor!

[Conservative Gato]

It's exactly the opposite. The delegate selection rules we have today were put into place to avoid a longer primary process - to avoid what happened with Romney.

Trump benefits from the rules change from Romney. He would be worse off with the previous primary process.

That is good then.

CGato

[Elyse]

Thank you. :)

[Hostage]

Yeah, the perverts at the Slimes (more than 95% of editors and reporters are homosexual; yes, it’s true; yes, it makes a difference as they are in fact a powerful hate-group of American greatness and history, but that’s an aside), the NYT is late, later than the leading edge on FR and in fact, you can bet they read threads here and get ideas on what to fill their columns with after their editors steer them to the desired spin.

Their topic is newsworthy but Becky Quick, cute little Becky Quick of CNBC, replacement for the hag formerly known as perky Katie, broke the news more than 3 weeks ago:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6YUPB2YcFvI

Now the homos at the NYT don’t have time to watch so much TV when they can more easily scan FR and get the same information real-time here.

Yeah, so anyways thanks for thinking to pass that on.

PS-NYT still does some good stuff but it’s not cutting edge, however, what they do stitch together is often nicely laid out for reference. I use their delegate schedule for lookup, because it puts most of the info I need on one or two pages in easy to find format. They’re good at that arranging colors and forms like most homos do with a flair.

I know, I know, I is a homophobiac, they hate straights (as I am) and straights hate them or will hate them and are growing to hate them again, as in history. The ‘hate’ is brought on by the resurrection of Christian persecution. My hate comes from the instinctive and logical progression of a chain of emotions that goes like this:

lie and betrayal —>
shock and hurt —>
anger and rage —>
hatred.

One must be wise enough to control the anger and quell the hatred, and then be smart enough to trap them and hang them. Patience is the key.

So that’s what a NY Times report does to this single father. It makes me spit. And they are not worth it anyways when one follows and learns from FR.

[wardaddy]

Cruzbots today on Free Republic have the following sites running bashing Trump

Politico

Red State

Salon

Slate

MSNBC

CNN

NYT

just for starters

[wardaddy]

Why don’t you read more than the headline

Cruz is doing nothing

The Republican Party establishment is loading their states delegate slates with unbound delegates whenever they can to try to stop Trump

Cruz just happens to maybe be the benificiary

Cruzbots just imagine

[mlo]

"I don’t understand why you are so giddy that millions of voters potentially will have their votes negated & thrown to a candidate they did not vote for or support?"

Trump has only gotten 39% of the popular vote in states that have already voted. Even in states where he won, he usually won with a minority vote. I don't hear anyone carping about all the people that DIDN'T vote for him being disenfranchised by the system because their delegates are bound to Trump.