Posted on 03/21/2018 8:49:04 AM PDT by ebb tide
Author Mary Eberstadt told students at the University of Notre Dame Tuesday that a 50-year-old document on contraception is critical to understanding the state of contemporary culture.
Eberstadt, a senior researcher at the Faith and Reason Institute, spoke at Notre Dame’s Center for Ethics and Culture, explaining that the prophetic message of Pope Paul VI’s 1968 encyclical Humanae Vitae has become a reality.
“Contraceptive technology, as Paul VI foresaw, opens a Pandora’s box of mischief in which the stronger have the advantage,” Eberstadt told Notre Dame students March 20.
“For some while now, it’s been apparent that the sexual revolution that began in the 1960s bids fair to become one of the most formative disruptions in human history,” Eberstadt argued. “It’s having massive repercussions across the world – microcosmic, macrocosmic, moral, religious, political, and otherwise.”
Eberstadt mentioned an article she wrote a decade ago, published in the journal First Things, at the 40th anniversary of Humanae Vitae. “It’s the same conclusion that was visible ten years ago, and that will remain visible ten, or one hundred, or two hundred years from now,” said Eberstadt. “It’s simply this: The most globally reviled and widely misunderstood document of the last half century is also the most prophetic and explanatory of our time.”
Fifty years ago, Eberstadt said, supporters of contraception argued that abortions and births to unmarried parents would diminish as a result of reliable birth control. Rather, she said, they have increased.
“Far from preventing abortion and unplanned pregnancies, contraception’s effects after the invention of the pill ran quite the other way: Rates of contraception usage, abortion, and out-of-wedlock births all exploded simultaneously.”
Eberstadt argued that abortion rates have increased as a result of the sexual revolution of the 1960s, and contraception in particular. She offered a series of proofs to support her claim.
First, she said abortions have increased because the responsibility of pregnancy has been increasingly placed on woman alone. While women may appear freer, she said, contraception has diminished men’s sense of responsibility for pregnancy, and therefore eroded their sense of responsibility toward pregnant women.
“By making the birth of the child the physical choice of the mother, the sexual revolution has made marriage and child support a social choice of the father,” she said, citing analysis by George Akerlof, Janet Yellen, and Michael Katz.
She next argued that contraception promotes abortion-on-demand because it encourages career plans that depend on delaying children until later in life. If an unexpected pregnancy interrupts such plans, she said, abortion is more likely to be considered.
Eberstadt also argued that the legalization of contraception and abortion are tied to another. She said movements towards the legalization of abortion always begin as birth control devices become more popular and available.
“Legal reasoning justifying freedom to contracept has been used to justify freedom to abort. You can’t have one without the other.”
Eberstadt mentioned that support for contraception is not universal.
She said many African nations have “resisted the attempts of reformers to bring them into line with the secular Western sexual program.”
She quoted an open letter written by Nigerian-born author Obainuju Ekaocha in response to a contraceptive initiative by billionaire Melinda Gates: “I see this $4.6 billion buying us misery. I see it buying us unfaithful husbands. I see it buying us streets devoid of innocent chatter of children…. I see it buying us a retirement without the tender loving care of our children.”
In contrast to Africa’s resistance to contraception, Eberstadt noted the demographic decline of Japan, where, she said, loneliness is pervasive, especially among the elderly, who often die alone.
As the destructive results of the sexual revolution become more obvious, Eberstadt said that many Protestant Christians have reconsidered prior positions on contraception.
“More and more people outside the Church are concluding from that same wreckage that Catholic moral teaching has called many things right, not only as of Humanae Vitae, but for the preceding millennia of consistent teaching.”
In conclusion, Eberstadt said that while people in the world will continue to oppose to the Church’s stance on contraception, the truth of Humanae Vitae will not stop pointing towards the destruction of the sexual revolution.
“To discern the record of the last half-century is to see that the Catholic Church was right to stand as a sign of contradiction to the devastation the sexual revolution would wreak; that accommodating top the revolution has been an epic fail for the churches that have tried it; and that the truths of Humanae Vitae and related documents burn all the more brightly against the shadowy toll of the destruction out there.”
“Be proud in the right way of your Church for getting one of the most important calls in history right,” Eberstadt encouraged. “And never let anyone put a kick-me sign on you for being an unapologetic Catholic.”
Common sense.
Thanks for posting.
Yes common sense that is much needed today.
ebb tide: thanks for all your postings. God bless.
She must have sneaked on campus ! Surely wasn’t invited.
Melinda's parents are staunchly pro-life. Too bad she doesn't listen to them anymore.
Common sense, yes: but the vast majority of FReepers wouldn’t agree with it.
A very sad fact.
Really? I would have thought that most freepers understand the 60s revolution was a bad thing.
Why would any one disagree? It is factual. It is not based on H.V. without an after history here for everyone to see.
Thanks. I’ve read this and it is excellent.
I consider it required reading for anyone under 35 who is not a DNA leftist.
Certainly explains how the West switched from colonizing the Third World to importing Third World populations. When you read of the incentives these “do-gooders” dangle in front of women in poor countries to get sterilized, you see pure evil at work.
You should not be.
Try it yourself. Get a guesstimate of what percentage of FReepers think contraception is either intrinsically wrong for moral reasons, or to be rejected for public-political, socio-medical, or other consequentialist reasons.
You will find, I think, that the overwhelming preponderance of FReepers see nothing whatsoever "wrong" with contraception, or see it as an obvious universal good, right up there with soap and cotton underwear.
I didn’t follow your link, but from previous reading I recall that even Prager, wise though he is, fails to really think it through and come out against contraception.
But correct me if I’m wrong. I’d love to be wrong.
I would agree that probably most freepers support contraception without fully understanding that it influenced all the disasters of the sexual revolution - including abortion as a form of contraception. I was thinking that, in general, they recognize that the revolution was a disaster.
Even FReepers who express hocking-and-spitting disgust or disdain at gay sex, often have no problem which straight men acting the exact same way with women, e.g. random lust, porn, sodomy and promiscuity.
After the "ick" factor recedes, they won't have any problem with LGBTHIVSTD, either --- no problem that a condom won't fix.
Don’t get me started on some of the dirty-minded men who have been unleashed on FR. I’ve complained about them but nothing is ever done.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.