Posted on 01/10/2014 6:36:51 AM PST by marshmallow
Moscow, January 10, Interfax - The human rights center of the World Russian People's Council supports the proposal of actor and priest Ivan Okhlobystin to return criminal liability for homosexuality.
"The idea to return the criminal article for sodomy seems quite logical to me. The non-acceptance of homosexuality is a sign of healthy moral atmosphere in the society along with the rejection of racism and chauvinism," human rights center director, expert of Islam, Roman Silantyev, told Interfax-Religion on Friday.
Homosexuals stopped being satisfied with the cancellation of the relevant article in the Soviet Criminal Code long ago and "are demanding special rights for themselves now," Silantyev said.
Returning the article for sodomy will give additional opportunities to isolate Wahhabis, who "practice sensuous perversions along with religious perversions," Silantyev said.
The relevant article of the Criminal Code will help Orthodox believers "to get rid of people, who indecently interpret the commandment on love," Silantyev said.
The World Russian People's Council is an international non-governmental organization, which was established in 1993 and has become the all-Russian tribune of the public thought. Representatives of all authorities' branches, public organizations, law enforcement agencies, higher clergy of traditional Russian religions, teachers and students, scientists and artists participate in the World Russian People's Council meetings. The World Russian People's Council is headed by Patriarch of Moscow and all Russia.
In 2005 the World Russian People's Council was granted a special consultative status under the UN. A number of Russian regions have branches of the World Russian People's Council.
Exactly. They need to be put back on playing defense. Promiscuous homosexuality, among other things, spreads fatal STDs and severely impacts the public's right to a healthy environment.
“Returning the article for sodomy will give additional opportunities to isolate Wahhabis, who “practice sensuous perversions along with religious perversions,” Silantyev said.”
Well said Mr. Silantyev.
It’s funny how in some ways Russia sounds more
appealing than Obama’s America. Of course when the
leader of the US is nothing more than a Mandela,
Mugabe knock off wannabe, then these observations
are typical.
*sigh* great... now we get to listen to Glenn Beck for another week whine that Russia is becoming a Nazi state! Stand with GLAAD! Ugh...
I thought Wahabbis were those folks in Saudi Arabia.
Is the suggestion to put homosexuals in jail?
They do treat women horribly and love little boys, but it would be Russia that sees this more clearly, as the Saudis have been attacking and sabotaging Russia since we started buying their oil.
Coincidentally (or not), Big Gay and the Gay Mafia have been making great strides toward (Gay) tyranny in the US.
Exactly - did you not know that homosexuality is extremely popular among Arab Muslims?
Hard to argue with their reasoning.
In short, “The experiment of bending for them and being overly concessionary has not worked - gays fit the old adage of “Give an inch and they demand a mile”. Plus, the concessions have made it more difficult to address other societal problems. Perhaps we should admit to the failed experiment and restore things to where they worked much better.”
Who can’t at least agree with the logic in this?
Criminalizing homosexuality is what all Godly nations should do. In this instance, at least, Russia is more Godly than we are.
I seriously doubt homosexuality is more common in the Muslim world considering they have less sex and the fact that they have severe penalties for it. Your statement is illogical.
You are wrong. They only think of the “receiver” as homosexual. I think you should google these matters. There is a reason that the Russians think it will disproportionately affect Muslims.
I mean Muslims only think of the receiver as homo.
Google anything and you can find “proof” of it. When homosexuals are killed in Arab countries, no distinction is made between pitching and catching.
If you have verifiable proof I am open to reading it.
You still did not answer my question as to your belief there is more homosexuality among Muslims than us.
If one society has homosexuality as legal and the other does not, how could it be more prevalent in the society it is illegal in?
Exactly. US inmates say the same thing when caught raping another inmate. My husband would let them know he was listing them as homosexual in their records when caught. They would scream that the one they were raping was the homo, not themselves. It was not purged from their records, though that may of changed now.
Debbi
Agreed.
Sounds like the Muslims have the same perspective on this like the hillbilly villains in “Deliverance”?
Yep. They definitely did not want the stigma of that in their records.
“I mean Muslims only think of the receiver as homo.”
That sounds similar to what ancient Romans used to think. I recently read that homosexual activity was only tolerated if the “active” participant was a Roman citizen and the “passive” receiver was a non-Roman citizen.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.