Skip to comments.
Annan Says U.S. Will Violate Charter if It Acts Without Approval
NYT ^
| 3/10/2003
| Patrick Tyler and Felicity Barringer
Posted on 03/10/2003 7:23:50 PM PST by ex-Texan
Annan Says U.S. Will Violate Charter if It Acts Without Approval
UNITED NATIONS, March 10 Secretary General Kofi Annan warned today that if the United States fails to win approval from the Security Council for an attack on Iraq, Washington's decision to act alone or outside the Council would violate the United Nations charter.
***
Mr. Annan's remarks drew a sharp response from Washington, where the Bush administration, like its allies overseas, was engaged in a strong lobbying effort to win the necessary nine votes to pass a resolution this week authorizing war.
The White House spokesman Ari Fleischer in a strongly worded retort said that "from a moral point of view," if the United Nations fails to support the Bush administration's war aims, it will have "failed to act once again," as it did in Kosovo in the face of persecution of the ethnic Albanians by Serbia and earlier in Rwanda in the face of genocidal massacres by Hutus against Tutsis.
Some international legal experts also took issue with Mr. Annan's assertions ***
***
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: aleagueoftheirown; annanidiot; callthewaaahmbulance; corruptannan; corruptun; dontmesswiththeus; dontneednostinkinun; kofitalk; leagueofnations; loungeofnations; nationalsovereignty; ooohimscarednow; saddamsuckup; theunkofi; toobadsosad; toughtoenails; trytostopus; unneedednations; unobsolete; whoyagonacall; youandwhicharmy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-131 last
To: Beck_isright
Yeah, but wouldn't the Dems. of leftist persuasion put up a terrible fight? They'd be screaming: "Hey, you can't do that!".
121
posted on
03/10/2003 9:31:07 PM PST
by
dsutah
To: dsutah
"Yeah, but wouldn't the Dems. of leftist persuasion put up a terrible fight? They'd be screaming: "Hey, you can't do that!"."
I think that depends on the next terrorist attack. Then we'll all be screaming bloody hell to get out of there. I hope at least.
122
posted on
03/10/2003 9:32:43 PM PST
by
Beck_isright
(going to the war without the french is like duck hunting without your accordian)
To: Hoverbug
that's a keeper!
123
posted on
03/10/2003 9:33:20 PM PST
by
DontMessWithMyCountry
(It's serious business being an American in America these days.)
To: Hoverbug
LOL; Good point
To: ex-Texan
and we care because....???
To: ex-Texan
Without the UN France nor Annan either one would have a job anymore.
Can't have that now can we? /sarcasm
To: ImpBill
You are an inspiration. I just sent a letter, as well. Thanks for the email address.
127
posted on
03/10/2003 10:03:12 PM PST
by
DontMessWithMyCountry
(It's serious business being an American in America these days.)
To: ConservativeMan55
Bump
Hey Kofi: KISS MY ASS!
Mine too!
128
posted on
03/10/2003 10:06:35 PM PST
by
B-Cause
To: B-Cause
Hey Kofi: KISS MY ASS! Mine too!
Mine too!
129
posted on
03/10/2003 10:24:24 PM PST
by
Hoverbug
(whadda ya mean, "we don't get parachutes"!?!)
To: goldstategop
Article 51
Nothing in the present Charter shall impair the inherent right of individual or collective self-defence if an armed attack occurs against a Member of the United Nations, until the Security Council has taken measures necessary to maintain international peace and security. Measures taken by Members in the exercise of this right of self-defence shall be immediately reported to the Security Council and shall not in any way affect the authority and responsibility of the Security Council under the present Charter to take at any time such action as it deems necessary in order to maintain or restore international peace and security.
I can't see where the US would be in violation of the UN Charter. I suppose some could argue that the Security Council "has taken measures necessary to maintain international peace and security." but only if you consider waffling and weaseling as indicative of the " authority and responsibility of the Security Council"
130
posted on
03/10/2003 10:28:33 PM PST
by
kanawa
To: ex-Texan
The United Nations has quickly morphed into the Useless Nations IMHO.
...It's time to kick these ingrates off our soil and make better use of that piece of Real Estate in New York.
-Regards, T.
131
posted on
03/10/2003 10:31:42 PM PST
by
T Lady
(.Freed From the Dimocratic Shackles since 1992)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-131 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson