Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"Dark Energy" Dominates The Universe
Dartmouth College ^ | January 2, 2003 | Brian Chaboyer, Lawrence Krauss

Posted on 01/03/2003 6:35:40 AM PST by forsnax5

DARK ENERGY DOMINATES THE UNIVERSE

HANOVER, NH - A Dartmouth researcher is building a case for a "dark energy"-dominated universe. Dark energy, the mysterious energy with unusual anti-gravitational properties, has been the subject of great debate among cosmologists.

Brian Chaboyer, Assistant Professor of Physics and Astronomy at Dartmouth, with his collaborator Lawrence Krauss, Professor of Physics and Astronomy at Case Western Reserve University, have reported their finding in the January 3, 2003, issue of Science. Combining their calculations of the ages of the oldest stars with measurements of the expansion rate and geometry of the universe lead them to conclude that dark energy dominates the energy density of the universe.

“This finding provides strong support for a universe which is dominated by a kind of energy we’ve never directly observed,” says Chaboyer. “Observations of distant supernova have suggested for a few years that dark energy dominates the universe, and our finding provides independent evidence that the universe is dominated by this type of energy we do not understand.”

The researchers came to this conclusion as they were refining their calculations for the age of globular clusters, which are groups of about 100,000 or more stars found in the outskirts of the Milky Way, our galaxy. Because this age (about 12 billion years old) is inconsistent with the expansion age for a flat universe (only about 9 billion years old), Krauss and Chaboyer came to the conclusion that the universe is expanding more quickly now than it did in the past.

The only explanation, according to Chaboyer and Krauss, for an accelerating universe is that the energy content of a vacuum is non-zero with a negative pressure, in other words, dark energy. This negative pressure of the vacuum grows in importance as the universe expands and causes the expansion to accelerate.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cosmology; crevolist; darkenergy; darkforce; darkmatter; physics; science; stringtheory
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

1 posted on 01/03/2003 6:35:41 AM PST by forsnax5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: *crevo_list
Cosmology PING!
2 posted on 01/03/2003 6:37:09 AM PST by forsnax5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chancellor Palpatine; Darth Sidious
Dark Energy Ping.


3 posted on 01/03/2003 6:41:06 AM PST by martin_fierro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro; Chancellor Palpatine; Darth Sidious; dighton
Use the Force, Luke!
4 posted on 01/03/2003 6:49:29 AM PST by BlueLancer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: forsnax5
9 Billion with 12 billion year old star clusters...well, that's a bit closer. Universe: 9-12 Billion (maybe 14 Billion). Oldest stars: 16-20 Billion.
5 posted on 01/03/2003 6:52:09 AM PST by lepton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: forsnax5
At least two of the world's primary energy sources, coal and crude oil, are very dark. Maybe this is just a shallow philosophic argument anyway.
6 posted on 01/03/2003 6:53:34 AM PST by FreePaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: forsnax5

ET PHONE HOME, DADDY WANTS YOU


7 posted on 01/03/2003 6:53:49 AM PST by bmwcyle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: forsnax5
Sounds like a Democratic scheme to me!
8 posted on 01/03/2003 6:55:01 AM PST by Henchman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: forsnax5
So that's where those voices are coming from....


All kidding aside, interesting article.
9 posted on 01/03/2003 6:56:16 AM PST by lds23
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: forsnax5
read later
10 posted on 01/03/2003 7:22:46 AM PST by LiteKeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro; jennyp; Junior; longshadow; *crevo_list; RadioAstronomer; Scully; Piltdown_Woman; ...
Dark energy ping.

[This ping list for the evolution -- not creationism -- side of evolution threads, and sometimes for other science topics. To be included, or dropped, let me know via freepmail.]

11 posted on 01/05/2003 11:00:49 AM PST by PatrickHenry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Recent cosmology threads:

Black Crunch jams Universal cycle [Cosmology].
Scientists Seek 'Dark Energy' That's Filling In the Universe.
Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation's Polarization Detected at Last.

12 posted on 01/05/2003 11:07:56 AM PST by PatrickHenry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
Krauss and Chaboyer came to the conclusion that the universe is expanding more quickly now than it did in the past.

Thanks for the ping.

I'm still trying to comprehend the above statement. I should have taken more math.

13 posted on 01/05/2003 11:19:11 AM PST by Focault's Pendulum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
That last paragraph:

The only explanation, according to Chaboyer and Krauss, for an accelerating universe is that the energy content of a vacuum is non-zero with a negative pressure, in other words, dark energy. This negative pressure of the vacuum grows in importance as the universe expands and causes the expansion to accelerate.
It has an eerily Barry-Setterfieldian "more energy is periodically pumped into the universe from the vacuum, thus violating conservation of energy" kind of ring. I hate it when the loonies get something to lawyer with.
14 posted on 01/05/2003 11:47:33 AM PST by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
ping
15 posted on 01/05/2003 11:57:32 AM PST by stands2reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
... the energy content of a vacuum is non-zero with a negative pressure ...

This sounds like what most of the crevo threads devolve into...

16 posted on 01/05/2003 12:01:02 PM PST by forsnax5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: forsnax5
They certainly expand readily.
17 posted on 01/05/2003 12:02:11 PM PST by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: forsnax5
The universe will forever be far more unpredictable than our laughable neat little theories envision.
18 posted on 01/05/2003 12:04:38 PM PST by friendly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
half-time bttt
19 posted on 01/05/2003 12:05:01 PM PST by longshadow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
... the energy content of a vacuum is non-zero with a negative pressure, in other words, dark energy ...

I donno. More energy is actually more matter/energy, which automatically means more gravity. And if gravity has a minus sign (as it must to cancel out matter/energy and result in a net zero for the universe), then this new dark energy stuff must be generating more gravity, which automatically cancels it out and we'd still have a net energy component of zero for the universe. Makes sense? We need Physicist to come to our aid.

20 posted on 01/05/2003 12:07:38 PM PST by PatrickHenry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson