Posted on 03/16/2024 2:36:19 PM PDT by delta7
Using duplicity, deception and secret alliances, the U.K.’s inner circle of top elites led by Nathaniel Rothschild, King Edward VII, and Lord Alfred Milner backed the German Kaiser into a corner and intentionally set the Germans up to blame them for starting the First World War, when in fact it was the British who provoked the Germans to the point where war was the only option.
German generals were caught strategizing several weeks ago on how to bomb Russia’s main bridge to Crimea. This would be an act of aggression that Russian President Vladimir Putin described as guaranteed to draw a harsh military response from Russia, possibly even including a nuclear strike against Berlin.
And that has led to an admission by German officials that their military is woefully unprepared to take on Russia. If German generals and politicians truly want to provoke a war with Russia, they had better slow down and wait for their military to catch up to the political rhetoric coming out of Berlin.
A March 14 article by John Cody at Remix News shows that the German Army lacks the personnel, equipment and infrastructure to wage a major war of any kind, let alone with a nuclear-armed military superpower like Russia.
Germany’s own military and government are painting such a dire picture of the armed forces that there are now calls from some of the most powerful politicians in the country to reinstate mandatory military service,” Cody writes.
Yes, a military draft.
A video produced by Remix News details testimony provided by Eva Högl, German Parliamentary Commissioner for the Armed Forces, who provided catastrophic details about the state of the German military. It is shocking in terms of its candor regarding the current state of the German armed forces.
She finds it “really impressive” that Germany has emptied out its military defense stocks by handing it over to Ukraine to be wasted in a losing war with Russia. That sounds like an admission of treason in the wide open.
ADVERTISEMENT
But wait. There’s more.
Germany knows it is incapable of taking on Russia so it is negotiating a secret deal with the insane leaders of two other European countries, France and Poland, for the very purpose of sending troops into Ukraine separate from NATO, although I do not believe this could truly be done without the acquiescence of Washington and London.
An organization called the Weimar Triangle – composed of France, Germany and Poland – has been in existence since 1991 at the fall of the Soviet Union.
The stated purpose of the Weimar Triangle was to assist Poland’s emergence from Communist rule. It’s strange that it still exists but it may have found a new purpose – instigating World War III with Russia.
ADVERTISEMENT Elon: Cut Your Electric Bill By 90% Forget Furosemide, Use This Household Item To Help Drain Edema Fluid Want relief before the big prostate swells up tight, stops all flow & stops you dead? Get this now. Elon: Cut Your Electric Bill By 90% Forget Furosemide, Use This Household Item To Help Drain Edema Fluid Forget Furosemide Use This Food To Help Drain Edema Fluid According to Wikipedia, “the Weimar Triangle exists mostly in the form of summit meetings between the leaders of the three countries and of their foreign ministers. The collaboration between member states includes inter-parliamentary contacts, military, scientific and cultural co-operation. The most recent summit of leaders occurred in Paris on June 12, 2023.” (Emphasis mine)
There’s been almost no media coverage of it, but Reuters reported yesterday, March 13, that the three nations of the Weimar Triangle are meeting Friday, March 15, in “hastily arranged talks” regarding how to move forward in aiding Ukraine in its war against Russia. This meeting may produce an agreement, possibly secretive, to build up their military personnel using conscription and other means for the purpose of ultimately inserting some combination of French, German and/or Polish troops into the Ukrainian battlefield against Russia.
Russia has won phase one of this war and the NATO nations are having to get creative if they want to continue the fight. And there is absolutely no question in my mind that they do want to continue the war against Russia. Why? Because Russia, even more than China, is the focal point of the BRICS coalition of nations that are challenging the U.S.-led world economic order which is tied to the U.S. petro dollar and U.S. military supremacy.
ADVERTISEMENT Around the Web Record Low Price: 2024 Silver American Eagle! LOXMALL According to the CDC, Every 40 Seconds Someone in the United States Has a Stroke Life Line Screening
Try This Simple Trick to Remove Old Toilet Stains in Minutes Splash Foam Cleaner All of the military experts I’ve been listening to over the past two years seem to miss the economic reasons for why the war will widen beyond Russia and Ukraine. It was never about Russia and Ukraine. It was about challenges and shifting realities related to the global economic order.
Military analysts have talked in terms of Ukraine or Russia winning or losing the war but few, if any, have really seriously considered the possibility of a third outcome – that neither Ukraine or Russia will “win” this war because the real war is not between Ukraine and Russia. It is between NATO and its allies and Russia and its allies. Ukraine is just a proxy and it’s about to be forced to limp off the battlefield. If a new influx of troops doesn’t come from somewhere, the war is over and Russia wins. But because of the economic reasons stated above and other reasons related to the West’s liberal social agenda that is at odds with Russia’s more conservative culture, NATO won’t let that happen.
Take for example, the “husband” of the U.S. Secretary of Transportation Pete Buttigieg, leading a group of children in a “Pledge of Allegiance to the Rainbow.” This would never be welcomed or allowed in Russia.
Around the Web Your Dream Car is Around the Corner Car Deals Near You Don't Let Parasites Make Your Body Their Home! There is Only One Way to Eradicat Anti parasite Surgeon: Tinnitus? When the Ringing Won't Stop, Do This (Watch) We Are Healthy News
So, if NATO can figure out a way to insert troops into Ukraine now that Ukraine has lost the war, and do it under the auspices of it being “separate from NATO,” then look for them to do exactly that.
The question is, will Putin buy the phony excuse that NATO has nothing to do with the fact that he’s now got Polish, German and French troops to fight in his back yard? When troops arrive in Ukraine from France, Germany and Poland, will he play along and say, oh, this is a separate endeavor and not really NATO, even though all three countries are NATO members? I don’t think so. But, this is exactly what NATO wants. It’s hoping to trick Putin into invading a NATO country.
Trending: Florida Officers Stop Haitian Vessel Heading for US Shores and Immediately Realize What’s Happening
The lie works something like this: French, German and Poland troops fighting in Ukraine are not doing so as part of NATO, but if Putin responds to this provocation by launching any direct attacks on cities or infrastructure in France, Germany or Poland, then he has “attacked” a NATO country and all of NATO now has the legal pretense to invade Russia.
Around the Web
How to Completely Clean a Dirty Oven Without Scrubbing Splash Cleaner A 70-yr-old Engineer Designed This Sneakers for Elderly Women All Over the World Dotmalls
The Wind Chime Hummingbird Feeder is Taking Massachusetts by Storm! Dotmalls I know it sounds crazy but look who is in charge of these NATO countries. They are all madmen and puppets of the World Economic Forum, the United Nations, the British Royal Family and the intel agencies in Washington and London.
Even though France, Germany and Poland would be fighting Russian soldiers in Ukraine under the guise of the “Weimar Triangle” there is no denying the fact that they are also members of NATO and NATO’s defensive mechanism would be triggered if Putin strikes back at any of these three countries. Then you have full-on World War III, which is apparently just what the U.S./U.K./NATO are looking to start. But before they can launch World War III against Russia they must position themselves as the “victim” by tricking Russia into attacking one of their NATO members. The Western media will be fully on board with this international chicanery and will intensify its propaganda war against Russia, characterizing that country and its leader as the “aggressor.” They will continue with the big lie about Putin wanting to “re-establish the old Soviet Empire.” Even though they have zero evidence of that, they will treat it like a foregone conclusion. They say it so it must be true.
History repeating itself?
This is where the Weimar Triangle comes into play in my hypothetical scenario, which I think is a very plausible scenario to watch for over the next six to 12 months. It will likely take about a year for the Weimar Triangle nations to build up their military prowess through forced conscription and converting to a wartime economy.
It sounds like treachery because it is. And it’s not without precedent. If you doubt that the Western powers are capable of such treachery, I recommend the excellent book, Hidden History: The Secret Origins of the First World War, by Gerry Docherty and Jim Macgregor.
According to the book’s thesis, the U.K.’s inner circle of top elites led by Nathaniel Rothschild, King Edward VII, and Lord Alfred Milner, used duplicity, deception, a propaganda campaign, and secret alliances to back the German Kaiser into a corner and intentionally set a trap for war. The Secret Elites used the bought-and-paid-for British press to whip up hatred against the Germans and then later to blame them for starting the First World War, when in fact it was the British who provoked the entire conflagration. Wars start when powerful money elites take away all options for peace.
The U.K. leadership of both the Conservative and Liberal parties feared Germany was rising and about to overtake Britain in terms of its economic output and potential military might. They had to be stopped, but in a way that made the U.K. and its allies look like the victims of an aggressive Germany, when in fact Germany had no desire for war, it just wanted to grow its economy.
To this day, every student in the West is taught that Germany started World War I. When it comes to war, the victor writes the history. And in this case it’s a false history, which is now on the verge of repeating itself.
World War III appears to be taking shape in very similar fashion to World War I, only instead of the Germans being the object of the West’s obsession, this time it’s the Russians and by extension the Chinese. These two nations and their leadership in developing the BRICS coalition of nations pose a threat to U.S. global economic dominance. They must be dealt with and dealt with harshly. You can already see the narrative building in the Western media. If you insert “World War III starts in Ukraine” into your favorite search engine, you will find articles galore on how “Russia wants to start World War III.”
Keep in mind we are talking about the same group of people fomenting this narrative who mandated toxic, genetically modifying jabs on their own militaries and their own civilian populations. Their consciences have been seared and they are about to fall in the grandest of fashion. Yes, a fall is coming. Pride goes before a fall, and you can see how pride is leading the West to believe it can defeat Russia in a war, which is an impossible feat. If NATO and Russia go head to head, there will be no winners. Nations that place their military leadership in the hands of women and transgenders have no future as a superpower and no ability to win a war against Russia or China. And yet, this is the very same feminized leadership that seeks to provoke war with Russia and China. All I can say is, good luck with that.
To receive new posts and support Leo Hohmann’s work, consider becoming a paid subscriber if you aren’t yet at leohohmann.substack.com
Submit additional information. TruthTweetShareGettrGabTelegram
Search for:
ADVERTISEMENT Your Dream Car is Around the Corner Video of the Week
Professor David Clements Speaks to TGP About his New “Let My People Go” Film
TGP Store Featured Product
'It's a' Ultra MAGA Classic Tee Trending on TGP
A boat full of Haitian referees is intercepted off the coast of Florida on Feb. 29. Florida Officers Stop Haitian Vessel Heading for US Shores and Immediately Realize What’s Happening
Trump Sounds Off After Special Prosecutor Resigns from Case: ‘BIG STUFF’
WATCH: Shocking Video of Joe Biden in Michigan Looking Lost and Needing Assistance Emerges After His Handlers Shut Out Press at Campaign Event
Check Out the INSANE List of Demands Don Lemon Made From Elon Musk Before His Show Was Booted From X
REPORT: Narcissist Meghan Markle Triggered Kate Middleton’s Mental Breakdown, Princess Under ‘Intense Stress’ Become A TGP Insider Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.
American Gulag Visit AmericanGulag.org to learn how to help the prisoners of the protest on January 6th. American Gulag Visit TGPVideos.com to watch the latest exclusive videos from The Gateway Pundit. TGP Truth As the mainstream media repeatedly fails and loses public trust, TGP has continued to offer accurate and timely reporting for almost two decades.
GLOBOHOMO NEVER RESTS.
Stopped at the second embedded advertisement.
Half advertising and the other half tin foil hat area.
If military personnel from France, Poland, Germany are placed in Ukraine, and Russia then attacks one of them, too bad soo sad. It does not trigger the NATO article of responding to an attack. It simple does not apply.
If we have a moron residing in the White House who wants a world war, then they can pretend otherwise, but I think that really could tear open the fabric of the country. Putting the entire country at risk of nuclear attack for no good reason could rip the country open.
From the article:
“Germany knows it is incapable of taking on Russia so it is negotiating a secret deal with the insane leaders of two other European countries, France and Poland, for the very purpose of sending troops into Ukraine separate from NATO, although I do not believe this could truly be done without the acquiescence of Washington and London.
An organization called the Weimar Triangle – composed of France, Germany and Poland – has been in existence since 1991 at the fall of the Soviet Union.
The stated purpose of the Weimar Triangle was to assist Poland’s emergence from Communist rule. It’s strange that it still exists but it may have found a new purpose – instigating World War III with Russia.”
___________________
Here’s the probable scenario where our true enemy is a belligerent faction of NATO itself:
France is intent on getting the USA nuked, because they’re America Last, not first. If it happens, we’ll insist France retaliate for us, instead of retaliating ourselves, because it’ll be undeniably their fault. Russia will be destroyed and so will America and the atheist neopagan fascists, like France and Germany will be ecstatic.
France will, if we don’t get Trump in first, put troops in Ukraine and Russia will defend itself by attacking the head of NATO.
Mark
The reptilian Eurotrash leadership thinks that they wil be able to pull in America just like they did in WW1 and WW2 but I believe that they are mistaken. The European 🔩 jobs are wearing out their welcome in America.
I can’t speak for Poland, but I think it would be a cold day in hell before the pampered populations of Germany and France ever accepted that kind of nonsense.
EXCERPTS:
The military enjoyed an outstanding social position in Prussia and Germany. The unification of Germany in 1871 had been achieved through military victories, which had significantly increased the reputation of the military in society.Social Darwinism and cultural pessimism had spread throughout Europe and America in the years before the First World War and had also found supporters in the German military.
The General Staff perceived the considerable progress in Russian arms build-up by 1910 as particularly threatening. This real concern was mixed with the topos of the insurmountable opposition between Germanism and Slavism, which presented an ideological exaggeration of the conflict that had been fostered since the Balkan Wars in 1912/13, especially in the German and Russian media.
The decades before the First World War were marked by a rapid change in military technology, in regards to both weapons systems as well as means of transportation and communication. The list of new inventions, some of which were groundbreaking, is long: These include smokeless powder, small-caliber multi-loading rifles, machine guns, Rapid fire field pieces and high explosive grenades, as well as field telephones, motor vehicles and aircraft.
Alfred Graf von Schlieffen (1833-1913) wrote the memorandum, later known as the Schlieffen Plan, the result of many years of deliberation, in December 1905 as a legacy for his successor. In view of the expected war on two fronts, he planned an attack on France via Belgium and the Netherlands whereby the German armies would bypass the French fortress belt. His plan also entailed annihilating the French army southwest of Paris around forty days after mobilising in order to quickly turn the troops towards the East against Russia. Due to geography, a quick victory only seemed possible in France. The second part of the Schlieffen Plan, war on the Eastern Front, was never elaborated.
Concepts of the Navy
In connection to its foreign policy reorientation towards “world politics”, the Reich in 1898 began to massively arm their Imperial Navy (Kaiserliche Marine). Under the influence of Alfred (von) Tirpitz (1849-1930) it was redesigned, not as a cruiser fleet to be operated overseas, but primarily as an ocean-going fleet with battleships destined for the North Sea. The redesign was influenced by a concept of risk (Risikogedanke) developed by Tirpitz and fixed itself on the world’s strongest sea power, Great Britain. The aim was to strengthen the German High Seas Fleet (Hochseeflotte) to such a degree that in the event of a war, the Royal Navy would suffer such losses, that even if it emerged victorious, it would lose its position of dominance at sea. The questionable political calculation behind this strategy assumed that Great Britain would thereby be forced to accept Germany’s foreign policy ambitions.
Pampered or not, the past hundred or so years would make a call to arms in these countries practically impossible.
Would that Americans had the skepticism towards military conflict that the French and Germans have...
Why would you invite war with the world’s largest nuclear arsenal, led by a man who seemingly has no hesitation about using them? This GP stuff is bordering on legal insanity. No one in their right mind wants to start a nuclear war, even with 2024’s reduced stockpiles. The folks who believe this should stop reading NEXUS.
Those poor, pacifist, slow-witted Germans taking the bait and falling into plots that make them declare war and invade other countries. How did we miss this before? The Kaiser and Hitler as men of peace?
The Ruzzians are so stultifying stupid that NATO can easily manipulate them and their “Genius” dictator. Ruzzians are retards per this pro-Ruzzian propaganda.
Starting a historical analogy with complete horse manure doesn't really work.
As Christopher Clark explains, what set the stage for WWI was Russia's defeat in the Russo-Japanese War. This moved Russia's probing for imperial advance away from East Asia and towards the Balkans, where unbeknownst to the court at St. Petersburg, the Russian ambassador in Belgrade was aiding and conspiring with Serb ultra-nationalists against Austria-Hungary. This would eventual result in the Black Hand assassinating Archduke Ferdinand.
Meanwhile, the French panicked because with Russia defeated, their defensive alliance with Russia seemed on shaky ground. As a consequence, France increased the tempo of its conscription, dramatically increasing the size of its trained reserves. France also made enormous loans to Russia for it to re-equip its armed forces and expand its rail network to deliver them more quickly to an eastern front against Germany.
This, of course, did not go unnoticed in Berlin and made the Germans think they had to strike first and strike quickly against France in the event of hostilities before Russia's vast resources (on paper) could be brought to bear.
The major power with the least to gain and least involvement was actually Great Britain, which had not joined any alliance structure. Unfortunately for them, the British Minister for War had given the French assurances that Britain would come to their aid. He just neglected to inform the Cabinet or Parliament. So when the French ambassador in London met with the British Cabinet upon war breaking out, they were aghast when they heard that the French had moved almost all their Navy to the Med because they expected the Brits to defend the French coast. The first vote for war was "No." Only in the morning did the Cabinet feel that honor required Britain to meet the promise of their Minister for War. That decision cost Britain and the Commonwealth almost 1 million dead.
I recommend Barbara Tuchman's The Guns of August for a more accurate account of the runup to WW1.
Which is why they won't be used.
And if the notion of MAD deterrence is broken, we're all screwed anyway.
King Edward VII, who died in 1910, backed the Kaiser into a corner in 1914 and forced him to invade neutral Belgium?
I suppose if Britain had told Germany early enough that the British Empire would definitely go to war if Belgium or France was attacked then there might have been no war, but I don’t see how Britain provoked Germany into war.
How to Completely Clean a Dirty Oven Without Scrubbing Splash Cleaner A 70-yr-old Engineer Designed This Sneakers for Elderly Women All Over the World The Wind Chime Hummingbird Feeder is Taking Massachusetts by Storm!
WATCH: Shocking Video of Joe Biden in Michigan Looking Lost and Needing Assistance Emerges After His Handlers Shut Out Press at Campaign Event Check Out the INSANE List of Demands Don Lemon Made From Elon Musk Before His Show Was Booted From X REPORT: Narcissist Meghan Markle Triggered Kate Middleton’s Mental Breakdown, Princess Under ‘Intense Stress’ Become A TGP Insider Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we’ll make sure to keep you in the loop.
If the Germans had stayed out of Belgium. The UK government would have had a had a hard time getting the UK to go to war.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.