Posted on 09/09/2023 7:05:54 AM PDT by CFW
The disbarment trial of Donald Trump’s attorney John Eastman is in its fourth week, and on Thursday the State Bar of California rested its case and Eastman’s attorney began putting on witnesses, beginning with former Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice Michael Gableman. Gableman was directed by the Wisconsin Legislature to conduct a minimal investigation of the 2020 election, and he revealed numerous instances where he believed the law was broken, and had election officials referred for prosecution.
Shortly after Gableman began testifying as Eastman’s first witness, the judge appeared to lose her temper at him. Gableman was discussing how he’d been appointed by Wisconsin Speaker of the House Robin Vos, and approved by the Wisconsin Assembly to serve as special counsel to investigate whether there was wrongdoing in the 2020 election. Gableman said it was “widely known” that Vos didn’t want a “deep” investigation, it was “not a serious effort.”
Carling objected to him stating it was “widely known” since it was hearsay. Although Roland has let in almost all hearsay favoring the California Bar so far, justifying it by stating the disciplinary court has extra exceptions for hearsay, she would not allow Gableman’s statement, and gave him a stern lecture. When Gableman inquired about the Rules of Evidence in that court, she looked upset and called for a break .....
.... Gableman discussed how Wisconsin election officials from the Wisconsin Elections Commission (WEC) ignored the law requiring bipartisan observers present when collecting votes from nursing homes and other assisted living facilities, and so the sheriff referred the election officials for criminal charges. Gableman said those officials said during a meeting that was videotaped that they knew they were breaking the law by telling the clerks to disregard the law and just mail the ballots to nursing home residents.
(Excerpt) Read more at thestarnewsnetwork.com ...
fair trial? in liberal lala land? Dream on!
Why should they hide it? Who is going to penalize them for it? It’s better to show that you can do this and get away with it. That removes any hope of justice and encourages people to avoid a trial where they are pre-destined to lose.
This trial will follow the standard for objectivity applied to Covid masks and Ivermectin effectiveness.
I don’t know who are the biggest bottom feeding biatches in this whole far-left, wingnut Trump fiasco. The hos he supposedly “raped” or the tyrants in black robes who are raping him.
This is not justice, it’s bs.
And Republican cowards say nothing.
Nuremberg.
We need the Oliver Cromwell treatment for judges like this! It will straighten things out quickly!!
Lawfare is warfare. We are at war, folks. Sorry to break into your “normalcy bias”.
Eastman is going to sue the California State Bar Association in Federal District Court and win big.
Really? You saying that the trial was not called for, not justly carried out, and the defendants weren't guilty of war crimes against humanity?
Figures, female judge. She should be at home barefoot and pregnant. Repeal the 19th.
Not on the same planet so I won’t even try to explain.
Perhaps he means Nuremberg as in what we should put these judges and officials through that are in on the Trump hunt.
I wouldn't expect an explanation if you're a Nazi sympathizer.
Quite so.
I’m thinking these political show trials are a lead in to the regime plans for 2024 and beyond.
Then he should explain the reference - otherwise, he could be taken to be a Nazi sympathizer - and we have enough of those hanging around.
“Eastman is going to sue the California State Bar Association in Federal District Court and win big.”
This should happen in every professional organization and jurisdiction.
Jordan Peterson should sue the Psychologists.
Rudy Giuliani should sue...
The 65 Project needs to backfire.
“Former Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle (D-S.D.) and Paul Rosenzweig, who served as former senior counsel for Ken Starr’s Whitewater investigation and was part of former President George W. Bush’s Department of Homeland Security, are advisory board members for the group.
Former Utah Supreme Court Chief Justice Christine Durham and Roberta Ramo, who was American Bar Association’s first female president, are also members of the board, according to its website.
David Brock, founder of Media Matters for America and the super PAC American Bridge 21st Century, will advise the group.
Brock told Axios the idea was to “not only bring the grievances in the bar complaints, but shame them and make them toxic in their communities and in their firms.”
The 65 Project is RICO time.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.