“Men and women are different.”
bottom line
I find women who use sex for validation to be odd. It is not an achievement of any kind to find a willing male even for the obese. The achievement is to find somebody willing to stick around after a one night stand, which ain’t gonna happen. Perhaps I am old fashioned, I have never engaged in one night stands with a few exceptions on drunken international trips when I was in my early 20s, but in the real world, a woman who would try to sleep with me on a first date is a huuuuuuuge turn off, no matter how “hot” she is externally.
sex without consequence, and all the things which spin from it, are without exception, damaging to women.
What happens these days:
Girls spend their 20’s having sex with exciting and desirable men, who would never had any interest in them if “no-strings” sex was not being offered.
When they hit 30, they look around for some chump to marry their much-used body, and become bitter and angry when it doesn’t happen.
“if it hadn’t been for these new-fashioned morals, there wouldn’t be all these new-fashioned kids, looking for their papas” - or something to that effect from Archie Bunker
But just look at the men today....we don't have men, or very few....
panty "waste" fairy boys and men...low testosterone, low sperm, and they need pills to make them feel like men again....
pitiful and pathetic...
congratulations to hugh hefner....and satan...
The real purpose of the sexual revolution was an alliance between the leftists who wanted to destroy the nuclear family, and the industrialists who wanted a larger labor forth for them to expand their businesses.
The convinced 2 generations of women that they’d be happier imitating men rather than be women. And left us to low birthrates that now require us to import foreign labor + shift job elsewhere, neglected children who are raised 2 working parents who have little time for them, and large amount of women who are depressed when they reach their 30’s and 40s and find that their careers aren’t actually as fulfilling as they were promised.
The sexual revolution destroyed the lives of many men. And many will pay for their participation forever.
This “revolution” resulted in much more of the same feminists always complained about, only more intense and brazen. Their “freedom” gave free rein to males to take full advantage - with less guilt.
Good to see there is a book about it.
Lotta replies here, forgive me if I missed this comment:
Why buy a cow if the milk is free?
Feminism was invented by a man. Men get all the benefits and women get dead babies.
Allie Beth Stuckey had a wonderful interview with her, you can find on youtube. It’s interesting seeing a conservative Christian and this non Christian feminist finding common ground. She even explained her theory on why so many young girls are going for this trans fad ( which she is absolutely against), it’s a frightened reaction to the horrifying hypersexualization of young girls ( violent porn) that they are seeing on their social media, it scares them and they want no part of it but think it is expected of them. So they think turning into a boy is a way to escape. What are we allowing to happen to our children in this country! It is absolutely evil!
Her advice at the end, “girls, listen to your mother!” ( or we Christians would say, obey God’s Word!)
There’s a reason why Hefner supported abortion and women’s lib. It freed men from the responsibility of sex and selling nude women made regular women feel inadequate and gave up sex easier. Hence women felt they had to put out to get the guy they desired because she was afraid her competition would and she’d lose her man.
Plus, men want to f_ck whores but marry virgins.
Prove me wrong.
Id wager average poster here has no inkling just how promiscuous their granddaughters peer group is
I’ve raised three boys in a row with two still at home
Girls have gone nuts
Where’s they learn it
Not what you think
Hugh Hefner is dead? That’s some good news I missed.
I think the sexual revolution was bad for conservatives and for traditionalism.
The sexually liberated feminazis want to elevate “slut” to the level of “stud”. They’ve even had “slut pride” marches.
They complain, why should “stud” have a positive connotation, whereas “slut” be degrading? They’re both about promiscuous behavior.
The difference is this. It used to be that a man, who had a reputation for being a woman’s man, a stud, had to use all their guile and charm to get a woman to sleep with him, so there was a certain level of respect for someone with that talent.
Women on the other hand could get just about any man to bed them with just the wink of an eye. In other words it took no effort on their part to get laid. As a result most men took the free gift and had no respect for the woman, and he labeled her a slut, someone with whom he would never form a serious relationship.
What is truly disgusting about what “sexually liberated” feminists have done to women is that they talked women to give away for free that which men would gladly pay for, and not with just money but with a sense of commitment and affection.
In other words they’d managed to devalue to nothing one of women’s most valuable assets.
GONGRATS FEMINIST SLUTS!