The sexually liberated feminazis want to elevate “slut” to the level of “stud”. They’ve even had “slut pride” marches.
They complain, why should “stud” have a positive connotation, whereas “slut” be degrading? They’re both about promiscuous behavior.
The difference is this. It used to be that a man, who had a reputation for being a woman’s man, a stud, had to use all their guile and charm to get a woman to sleep with him, so there was a certain level of respect for someone with that talent.
Women on the other hand could get just about any man to bed them with just the wink of an eye. In other words it took no effort on their part to get laid. As a result most men took the free gift and had no respect for the woman, and he labeled her a slut, someone with whom he would never form a serious relationship.
What is truly disgusting about what “sexually liberated” feminists have done to women is that they talked women to give away for free that which men would gladly pay for, and not with just money but with a sense of commitment and affection.
In other words they’d managed to devalue to nothing one of women’s most valuable assets.
GONGRATS FEMINIST SLUTS!
Women provide sex and babies. Men provide commitment, support, and protection.
The slut is a woman who is such a loser that her sexual availability is the only reason men tolerate her company. A woman acts the slut in a futile attempt to get SOMEONE to commit to her, love her, and provide for her. She is to be pitied.
The corresponding type of male is not the stud, but rather the cuckold — someone who gives his commitment and support without receiving in return her love and faithfulness, and who may not even be getting any sex out of the relationship.