Federal Judge Rules Against Natural Immunity Claim Challenging COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate

The Epoch Times ^ | 10/1/21 | Jack Phillips

[Blood of Tyrants]

A federal judge on Oct. 8 denied a request to block Michigan State University’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate on the basis of natural immunity.

An employee at the school, Jeanna Norris, filed a lawsuit against the mandate and asked a judge to intervene on the basis that she had already contracted COVID-19 and recovered. She presented two antibody tests showing her previous infection, and her doctors told her that she didn’t need to get the vaccine at this time.

Despite her natural immunity, Norris faces termination from the university for not complying with the school’s mandate that all students and staff get the shot unless they have a medical or religious exemption.

U.S. District Judge Paul Maloney, an appointee of former President George W. Bush, declined her lawsuit. The mandate, Maloney said, didn’t violate her fundamental rights and pointed to a 1905 Supreme Court ruling.

[Blood of Tyrants]

So much for science. He goes all the way back to 1905 to find a reason to deny her her rights. Judges can be bought the same as politicians or scientists.

[E. Pluribus Unum]

We don’t believe in science.

[Gene Eric]

>> He goes all the way back to 1905 to find a reason to deny her her rights.

#ing scumbag

[MNJohnnie]

Total misapplication of the law. This is a Judge more worried about his PR with the Lying Media then the rule of law.

Jacobson vrs Mass specifically refers to the state legislature having this power. It has no bearing on a case of arbitrary executive action.

[mass55th]

A Federal Judge doesn’t have a license to practice medicine, or give advice about medical treatments.

[Extremely Extreme Extremist]

That 1905 SCOTUS ruling is completely irrelevant to COVID or any other bioweaponized pandemics.

[JoJo354]

This is just all so evil.

[Flick Lives]

“This Court must apply the law from the Supreme Court: Jacobson essentially applied rational basis review and found that the vaccine mandate was rational in ‘protect[ing] the public health and public safety,’” Maloney said in his order. “The Court cannot ignore this binding precedent.”

—

The judge is a moron who is fixated on the vaccine. The point of the vaccine is supposed to be immunity. This woman has immunity.

[skr]

Unwanted invasive procedures tend to violate one’s fundamental rights.

[eyeamok]

All Lawyers are scum
Most politicians are Lawyers by trade
All Judges are Lawyers in drag

[kiryandil]

No worries for him.

He got The Saline, like the rest of the Elites.

[Blood of Tyrants]

“The point of the vaccine is SUPPOSED to be immunity.”

We all know that the point of the vaccine is NOT to get people immune. It is far more nefarious than that.

[ronnie raygun]

the system is broken

[MNJohnnie]

Judge also total ignored the part of the decision that sites the state legislative authority for this 1905 law.

No such legislative authority for mandatory Covid “vaccination” exists.

[ronnie raygun]

we the people need to fix what is broken

[Robert DeLong]

Appointed by George W. Bush

[inchworm]

Nother dumb bushie.

[Captain Walker]

The judge is a moron who is fixated on the vaccine.

In 20 or 30 years, when the psychologists look back on this and try to determine the different points in time when the discussion went off the tracks and no longer followed science, it will be noted that the most important point was when the discussion shifted from the goal of "herd immunity" to "mass vaccination".

This will be recognized as the point where the interests of the State (mass vaccination) diverged from the interests of the individual (immunity) and the relationship between the State and the individual formally ruptured.

[OrangeHoof]

Madness. This should prove to everyone that this mandate is not benign and there is something more afoot than just health.

[Safrguns]

Appeal!