Posted on 04/29/2021 12:02:37 PM PDT by ChicagoConservative27
President Joe Biden said Thursday during a preview of an interview with MSNBC’s Craig Melvin that he had no advance knowledge of federal investigators’ raid on former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani’s apartment and office.
The full interview will air Friday morning on NBC’s “Today” show.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
They don't need to be contacted ... they just mumble under their breath, "it's about time"
Sure. That means he ordered it to happen but didn’t know the exact time.
Does it matter if he knew? Since he is not involved in any decision making regarding the DOJ and the coup d’etat that put him in office, why ask him?
Just like Obama’s “I heard about it on the news” BS.
I’m actually surprised that the FBI didn’t shoot Giuliani for “interfering with a federal search”, or some such nonsense.
The same thing Obozo said about Hillary’s closet server and private e-mail. Nothing unusual, both are inveterate bastard liars.
As Caliban shouted in Shakespeare’s The Tempest: HORSEPISS!
Agreed. His handlers knew tho'. Maybe kameltoe as well. Although it's difficult to see why the deep state would keep her in the loop. They're both rather Claudius like - useful idiot figureheads for the Praetorians, but not needed for operational decisions.
This is the same lie Obama always relied on to try to distance himself from his own evil handiwork.
Dementia Joe took that right from the Obama terrorism book.
I have no problem believing he was completely unaware.
Unless his pudding serving nurse-ette tells him, I’m sure he had no idea.
Never believe anything in DC until it has been officially denied.
Now he’s plagiarizig 0moeba, who said he learned about things by reading them in the paper.
Like Michael Corleone settling all family business while he was at a Christening.
More proof Obama is running things in his illegal third term.
Remember: Plausible deniability?:
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Plausible deniability is the ability of people, typically senior officials in a formal or informal chain of command, to deny knowledge of or responsibility for any damnable actions committed by others in an organizational hierarchy because of a lack or absence of evidence that can confirm their participation, even if they were personally involved in or at least willfully ignorant of the actions. If illegal or otherwise-disreputable and unpopular activities become public, high-ranking officials may deny any awareness of such acts to insulate themselves and shift the blame onto the agents who carried out the acts, as they are confident that their doubters will be unable to prove otherwise. The lack of evidence to the contrary ostensibly makes the denial plausible (credible), but sometimes, it makes the denial only unactionable.
The term typically implies forethought, such as intentionally setting up the conditions for the plausible avoidance of responsibility for one’s future actions or knowledge. In some organizations, legal doctrines such as command responsibility exist to hold major parties responsible for the actions of subordinates who are involved in heinous acts and nullify any legal protection that their denial of involvement would carry.
In politics and espionage, deniability refers to the ability of a powerful player or intelligence agency to pass the buck and to avoid blowback by secretly arranging for an action to be taken on its behalf by a third party that is ostensibly unconnected with the major player. In political campaigns, plausible deniability enables candidates to stay clean and denounce third-party advertisements that use unethical approaches or potentially-libelous innuendo.
Although plausible deniability has existed throughout history, the term was coined by the CIA in the early 1960s to describe the withholding of information from senior officials to protect them from repercussions if illegal or unpopular activities became public knowledge.
In other words, if you do it, you don’t tell me before, during or after you do it!
I’m sure Biden is not in the loop.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.