Posted on 09/21/2020 6:18:49 AM PDT by karpov
Yup
= = = = = = = = = = = = = =
I agree BUT am sure he has his 'reasons'...
However,
Have had it up to ''''''HERE'''''' with 'big news' coming 'sooner or later'
As to the LIBs, I ran across this great line associated with Vlad the Impaler....
“None of us like each other, but one thing is for sure, we all hate you.”
RoChe Montoya, The 2nd Realm
That is a line the LIBS use on themselves inre PDJT in particular, all of us in general
ACB is the one.
She’s the most qualified, she has the most experience, and she has the fire.
Now is not the time to play identity politics.
Larsen gets good reviews on her polish. Barrett apparently not as good in some of her confirmation responses.
And do we really want a Jeb/Marco Justice even if she has a toughness to her?
IMPORTANT
Sunday on ABC’s “This Week,” Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) said he believed President Donald Trump’s Supreme Court pick would be confirmed before the election.
Cruz said such action was justified by the U.S. Senate, given the possibility the high court would have to weigh in on the presidential election.
JOE BIDEN has been explicit. He has said, IF HE DOESN’T WIN HE WILL CHALLENGE THE ELECTION. He’s going to go to court. He’s going to challenge it. He’s already hired a big legal team. Hillary Clinton has told Joe Biden, “Under no circumstances should you concede.” Given that, there is a serious risk of a constitutional crisis, IF JOE BIDEN is bringing litigation, like we had in Bush v. Gore but IN FIVE OR TEN STATES…
It talks about the epic battle where AL GORE CHALLENGED THE ELECTION RESULTS, AND FOR 36 DAYS, THE COUNTRY WAS HELD IN CHAOS.
Well, IF JOE BIDEN DOES THIS AGAIN THIS YEAR AND WE HAVE AN EQUALLY DIVIDED 8 (SUPREME COURT), 4-4, CAN’T DECIDE ANYTHING.
That could make this PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION DRAGS ON FOR WEEKS AND MONTHS AND WELL INTO NEXT YEAR! That is an INTOLERABLE SITUATION FOR THIS COUNTRY. We NEED a FULL COURT ON ELECTION DAY, given the VERY HIGH LIKELIHOOD that we’re going to SEE LITIGATION THAT GOES TO COURT.
WE NEED A SUPREME COURT THAT CAN GIVE A DEFINITIVE ANSWER FOR THE COUNTRY.
IMPORTANT
Sunday on ABC’s “This Week,” Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) said he believed President Donald Trump’s Supreme Court pick would be confirmed before the election.
Cruz said such action was justified by the U.S. Senate, given the possibility the high court would have to weigh in on the presidential election.
JOE BIDEN has been explicit. He has said, IF HE DOESN’T WIN HE WILL CHALLENGE THE ELECTION. He’s going to go to court. He’s going to challenge it. He’s already hired a big legal team. Hillary Clinton has told Joe Biden, “Under no circumstances should you concede.” Given that, there is a serious risk of a constitutional crisis, IF JOE BIDEN is bringing litigation, like we had in Bush v. Gore but IN FIVE OR TEN STATES…
It talks about the epic battle where AL GORE CHALLENGED THE ELECTION RESULTS, AND FOR 36 DAYS, THE COUNTRY WAS HELD IN CHAOS.
Well, IF JOE BIDEN DOES THIS AGAIN THIS YEAR AND WE HAVE AN EQUALLY DIVIDED 8 (SUPREME COURT), 4-4, CAN’T DECIDE ANYTHING.
That could make this PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION DRAGS ON FOR WEEKS AND MONTHS AND WELL INTO NEXT YEAR! That is an INTOLERABLE SITUATION FOR THIS COUNTRY. We NEED a FULL COURT ON ELECTION DAY, given the VERY HIGH LIKELIHOOD that we’re going to SEE LITIGATION THAT GOES TO COURT.
WE NEED A SUPREME COURT THAT CAN GIVE A DEFINITIVE ANSWER FOR THE COUNTRY.
Picking a Supreme Court nominee based on upping your voter base is the stupidest idea ever.
The Dims want 11 Justices so fine. The President nominates Barrett, Britt and Lagoa and gives the Dems their 11 Justices. Trump can say I am acting in a bipartisan manner and giving the Dems what they want! That would make it a 8 conservative 3 liberal and who knows what Roberts is thinking. Just to have parity the Dems, when in control, would have to raises the Justices to 17. They would need 19 to have a majority.
Best part would be watching their heads explode when Trump floats the idea!
.........when my daughter, a CPA and controller of a medium size company, announced her engagement I asked her if she was going to hyphenate her name......she said No, something that Dad agreed with.
I tend to lean toward the anti communist Lagoa. One reason is that she doesn’t feel the feminist need to hyphenate her name.
Did Ginsburg, ever, every cross over and vote with conservatives in a split vote that may have made a difference?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.