Posted on 06/02/2020 4:27:07 AM PDT by billorites
this disgusting “JUDGE” deems himself above
SCOTUS and above the US Constitution.
Dirty Emmet Sullivan, leader of the Blackrobe Seditionists.
We’ll be needing a longer pockmarked wall.
Sullivan has clearly violated the Constitution sufficiently for him to be impeached. However with traitorous Demonicrats in control of the House, he will not be inpeached during this Congress.
Huzzah! Huzzah!
So, why are people who were coerced to plead guilty of a crime they didn’t commit later released from incarceration after evidence is discovered that they didn’t commit it? If government can do this to Flynn, it can do it to anyone.
With Roberts, can’t be too sure.
How about the Motion for Hempamus?
Great article.
Sullivan is a political hack.
He should be removed from his bench.
He was to ignorant to write his own response
and had to hire a white woman to do it for him.
And that is a sad state of affairs.
Despite the release of Brady material showing that the career prosecutor lied and fabricated and defied the Judges order to release Brady material,
Oh, and it turns out it's not just an "acting" US Attorney but now it turns out that the Solicitor General of the United States briefed showing that it is the official position of the whole US government that the case be dismissed - you know - the guy who represents the US government in every case before the US Supreme Court.
Sullivan is a dritbag clown playing in a sandbox with his Antifa friends while the adults have serious things to do.
Oh, and another thing. An attorney for a Judge cannot write a statement of facts for the judge representing the facts that the judge himself should have presented and present facts that the Judge himself should have found and that are readily demonstrated as inconsistent with the material facts in the public record.
This isn't a lying weasel of an attorney - that too - but Sullivan himself was required to respond, so her lies are his lies.
It's all in-effin-conceivable.
Exactly. Roberts is not to be trusted.
It would be great for Sullivan to be dismissed from the case AND (preferably) from the court.
He is not doing his job, so take it away from him. Is there no recourse in The Constitution for removing bad judges?
Another good article by Margot Cleveland from yesterday.
It will not surprise me; it has been abundantly clear for some time.
First box is the soapbox - our “free press” is closing it down;
Second box is the ballot box - so corrupted as to be useless;
Third box is the jury box - see Judge Sullivan; and
Fourth box - may it never be opened, for if it is, we will have a different country. Only God knows what kind it will be.
Sullivan clearly has a case of Democrat/Left governor-envy. If they can get away with this, why can't he?!
He is controlled by others and he cannot give back the money. If the case is taken away from him then he can do no more and can say to his masters that it was not his fault that the case (and thereby the gag order) was ended. He skates with his life and money.
The masters will need to consider another method to keep Mike Flynn from talking.
The slap-down of this Judge is coming. The question is how hard will the slap-down be. I am hoping like a recent 9-0 SC vote sledgehammer.
Transfer the judge to traffic court in north Alaska.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.