Skip to comments.
Judge Sullivan Finally Responds To Mandamus Petition In Flynn Case, Proving Why It Was Necessary
The Federalist ^
| January 2, 2020
| Margot Cleveland
Posted on 06/02/2020 4:27:07 AM PDT by billorites
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 last
To: gogeo
Thats an excellent article. Flynn didnt lie. Nothing is going to happen to Mueller. However he has nothing left in tool kit but to play himself as the doddering old fool...
41
posted on
06/02/2020 9:30:06 AM PDT
by
EVO X
To: billorites
Its obvious Sullivan is not remotely interested in the law. Just take the case away from him and dispose of it as constitutionally required.
42
posted on
06/02/2020 10:17:22 AM PDT
by
FLT-bird
To: Sasparilla
Case was dropped due to Brady violation; withholding exculpatory evidence. People get disbarred and lose their careers over this, and yet, this judge says its ok.
To: Mr. K
Is there no recourse in The Constitution for removing bad judges? sure - it s called impeachment. Only requires a simple majority in the House (lots of luck with Pelosi as Speaker) and a 2/3 majority in the Senate (lots of luck with that, under any circumstances).
44
posted on
06/02/2020 1:00:04 PM PDT
by
conservatism_IS_compassion
(Socialism is cynicism directed towards society and - correspondingly - naivete towards government.)
To: Whenifhow; null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; AZ .44 MAG; Baynative; bgill; ...
45
posted on
06/02/2020 8:02:29 PM PDT
by
bitt
('Tyranny' is when you restrict the movement of healthy people.")
To: billorites
46
posted on
06/03/2020 4:08:06 AM PDT
by
Candor7
( (Obama Fascism:https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2009/05/barack_obama_the_quintessentia_1.ht)
To: GOPJ; Grampa Dave; Ann Archy; RitaOK; Jane Long; poconopundit; TADSLOS
The US Senators amici curiae brief for Flynn makes this brilliant point, overlooked by many:
<><>Sullivan is violating Article II of the Constitution,
<><>Article II grants prosecutorial discretion solely to the executive branch.
<><>Sullivan is also violating Article III of the Constitution;
<><>Sullivan is attempting to rule in a case where there is no case or controversy.
47
posted on
06/03/2020 6:13:40 AM PDT
by
Liz
( Our side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use. http://www.fr)
To: Highest Authority
Not no but HELL NO. This clown masquerading as a judge needs to be as far away as humanly possible from ANY source of judicial power - Leavenworth comes quickly to mind.
48
posted on
06/03/2020 7:22:36 AM PDT
by
Spacetrucker
(George Washington didn't use his freedom of speech to defeat the British - HE SHOT THEM .. WITH GUNS)
To: billorites
When will the Second Circuit respond?
49
posted on
06/04/2020 6:31:37 AM PDT
by
bwest
To: bwest
Oral arguments are scheduled for Friday, June 12. Ruling wont come for some time after that.
50
posted on
06/04/2020 6:39:26 AM PDT
by
billorites
(freepo ergo sum)
To: billorites
Thanks. I was hoping for a quicker resolution...
51
posted on
06/04/2020 6:45:13 AM PDT
by
bwest
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson