Judge Sullivan Finally Responds To Mandamus Petition In Flynn Case, Proving Why It Was Necessary

The Federalist ^ | January 2, 2020 | Margot Cleveland

[EVO X]

That’s an excellent article. Flynn didn’t lie.

Nothing is going to happen to Mueller. However he has nothing left in tool kit but to play himself as the doddering old fool...

[FLT-bird]

It’s obvious Sullivan is not remotely interested in the law. Just take the case away from him and dispose of it as constitutionally required.

[KC_Conspirator]

Case was dropped due to Brady violation; withholding exculpatory evidence. People get disbarred and lose their careers over this, and yet, this judge says its ok.

[conservatism_IS_compassion]

Is there no recourse in The Constitution for removing bad judges?

sure - it ’s called “impeachment.” Only requires a simple majority in the House (lots of luck with Pelosi as Speaker) and a 2/3 majority in the Senate (lots of luck with that, under any circumstances).

[bitt]

p

[Candor7]

Sullivan?

‘ang ‘em.

[Liz]

The US Senators’ amici curiae brief for Flynn makes this brilliant point, overlooked by many:
<><>Sullivan is violating Article II of the Constitution,
<><>Article II grants prosecutorial discretion solely to the executive branch.
<><>Sullivan is also violating Article III of the Constitution;
<><>Sullivan is attempting to rule in a case where there is no “case or controversy.”

[Spacetrucker]

Not no but HELL NO. This clown masquerading as a judge needs to be as far away as humanly possible from ANY source of judicial power - Leavenworth comes quickly to mind.

[bwest]

When will the Second Circuit respond?

[billorites]

Oral arguments are scheduled for Friday, June 12. Ruling wont come for some time after that.

[bwest]

Thanks. I was hoping for a quicker resolution...